'jarta' ...................................
The only thing I see wrong here is how you’re flipping the events!
CMKX was served via Oshins & Associates, the registered agent for CMKX.
Any Officer and/or Director of CMKX can also be served via Oshins & Associates along as having any Officer and/or Director served via the procedures of substituted service!
We then have a 3 day default notice being served to Moran.
NOT Oshins and Associates, served to Moran!
You’re failing to recognize the open communication between Moran and Carrano’s attorney. In other words, the fact that the case was served at Oshin’s and Carrano’s attorney has sent the default notice to Moran ~ Open communication exists between the two (2) parties. Moran is Urban’s attorney in the Rutherford case and Moran has been served a 3 day default on the Carrano case. What does that tell you?
So for you to say that Urban has never been served on the Carrano lawsuit ……….
I’ll have to disagree with you!
And you can keep on thinking what you want too!
Re: The Sister State .........................
And what's going to be the defense?
The default judgment is not valid even though service was performed and someone chose to not reply?
Don't you think you're stretching the "lack of personal jurisdiction" defense past the intent of the regulation?
.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
