Pedro, ... "If Moran is representing Urban personally in the Rutherford lawsuit, does that make Moran the “registered agent” of Urban? I say yes!"
Pedro, your conclusion is just plain wrong. (It's as lacking in sense as the conclusion that because DeBeers "knows what it's doing" in the diamond business and owns claims in the FALC area, all claims in the FALC area are both diamondiferous and commerically viable.)
I'm not a big fan of Wikipedia about legal issues, but this layman's opinion is pretty good:
Hiring an attorney to file an appeanance and represent you in one suit just does not make him the "registered agent" for service in a completely different suit (or all other suits). There is no such implied authority or responsibility beyond the contract for representation in the first suit.
The Sister State provisions where a judgment entered in one State can be registered in another State do not prohibit a challenge in the Sister State's court system to the effectiveness of the judgment based upon a lack of personal jurisdiction to enter the judgment.
I did not say that "long arm" jurisdiction may not be obtained in a proper instance over UC. What I said is based upon the court record in Nevada. I looked at the link you posted. There is no record of a return of service (like a certified mailing in an appropriate case or the usual affidavit of personal service on a permitted person - including any return for serving Moran with summons) for UC. Therefore, I believe the entry of any default judgment at this time would be improper as to UC, but entirely proper as to CMKX (CMKI). ... eom
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
