News Focus
News Focus
icon url

flipper44

01/26/26 12:44 PM

#811533 RE: jesster64 #811529

Essentially, what it looks like regulators(MHRA) and NWBO are considering has been to establish an environment where rGBM and nGBM can be commercialized whilst DCVax-l and DCVax-Direct can be used in specials for all solid tumor cancers and collect real world evidence, without interfering with DCVax-L’s commercial profitability intellectual property through orphan designated exclusive use IP DCVax-l using for GBM. For L, once enough data collected they would probably only commercialize more orphan diseases, like pancreatic or recurrent ovarian platinum resistant, for example, and piggy back on the exclusive use, however, for DCVax-Direct, which has a robust patent out to 2036, they could commercialize whatever worked in specials and/or trials. Finally, combos likely only initially in trials.
icon url

exwannabe

01/26/26 12:54 PM

#811536 RE: jesster64 #811529

The question remains, what type of cancer will they go for next? I know LP mention ovarian


The only trial LP said is planned is ovarian with the Roswell tech. They have decided not to launch any -L combo or Direct trials for now.

The Roswell tech is unrelated to either -L or Direct. So basically no trials planned for either NWBO tech and a P1/2 for the recently unlicensed tech from Roswell.

They are not even close to approvals in other indications. 0 chance this decade.