Replies to post #368633 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

That is an outright LIE:

and it became the Final Order of Dismissal in June 2023 .

Foelak had ZERO to do with the Commissions decision to drop the OIP.

The RECORD IRREFUTABLY PROVES THAT!

Blow it out your rear end, POO.

You are a liar.

Here's ANOTHER LIE:

4. The Petition for Review is internal only

Where do you COME UP WITH THIS SHIT????

Internal, eh?? Is THAT why it is part of this record, that shows all the PUBLIC DOCUMENTS Dealing with the OIP against DBMM?

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/administrative-proceedings/3-17990

Here's what ChatGPT has to say, when asked if a "Petition for Review is an "Internal Document" to the SEC:

Why it’s not “internal”

A petition for review:

Is submitted by a litigant, not SEC staff

Is part of the official record

Is served on the opposing party

Is typically posted publicly on the SEC’s website

Is subject to FOIA unless sealed or exempt

This is the opposite of an internal document.

Here's ANOTHER lie:

6. What doesn’t matter is Enforcement comments out of context and ignored by the full Commission.

HUH? Is THAT why the commission GRANTED the Petition for Review??? Because they chose to IGNORE comments by the DOE??

You are SO FULL of it POO!

NO ONE believes you any more!

Give it up!