Replies to post #49782 on Raadr Inc (RDAR)

[Let's See The Profits]

Insider sales are not a big deal and won’t trigger a suspension. We’re focused on the real crux: the big block trades that happened before the run-up, that’s what, in our view, would attract regulatory attention. Insider sales happen all the time in every company; making them look worse than they are only distracts from the trades that matter.

typical wolf cub using chatgpt.

I get this image of some fat, lazy, unwashed, greasy guy, parked on his couch with his phone, copy-pasting old posts like it’s a full-time job. Anyone else getting that vibe?

[BigBadWolf]

As it relates to Insider Sales

Why might the Heritage/Taddeo sells look suspect even thought the reporting of said timeline was again spot on.

Timing (insider/precautionary selling) as selling immediately before a regulator suspension often suggests knowledge of imminent enforcement or market concerns or at minimum opportunistic exit ahead of adverse action.

Pattern fit with pump-and-dump dynamics: accumulation at very low prices by one group, then higher-price blocks and a later insider exit is a classic manipulation signature (accumulate ? pump ? insiders exit).

(Should there be discovered a) Relationship to block trades meaning if the counterparty to the low-price blocks or the high-price ramps can be linked (directly or indirectly & related data would be part of any investigation) to Heritage or related parties, that suggests coordinated transfers rather than arm’s length market trades.

Disclosure timing of Heritage Ventures was spot on. any AMF/Euronext insider disclosure that is late, amended, or contradicts other filings is suspicious (possible attempt to conceal).

Price effect on sale proceeds: selling before suspension preserves exit value; combined with the earlier ramp, it may have allowed insiders to monetize at peaks created by the ramp. (again perception yet more will be known once the investigation is concluded)

Obviously ControllabilityIam