Replies to post #40464 on Raadr Inc (RDAR)

[NebraskaOTC]

$RDAR - Decide which best explains that which is clearly visible on $RDAR's everywhere for yourselves

$RDAR is a complete SCAM. Easy peasy lemon squeezy!

[Bubae]

All that is as good an excuse as any. 🙄 Could also be that management just communicated that the reverse split is on the table for this bloated share structure. Six billion shares added to the float between the end of March 2024, three billion between October to the end of 2024. The narrative Mexedia showed up with has been discredited and it is clear given the last three press releases that they don't have any game left. Time to reset the board for the next phase of dilution.

Bubae
Re: Homebrew post# 40299
Saturday, February 01, 2025 2:41:19 PM
Post# 40300 of 40465
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175746866&txt2find=found

Found a screen shot of a OTC site update in a post from March 2024. The Unrestricted share count was reported to be less than 500 million for March 27th 2024. By the end of 2024 it was 6 billion shares unrestricted. Looking at 3 billion shares added to unrestricted since October 9th. Doesn't seem plausible that they managed to get so many free trading shares to dump within the rules so quickly. Looking at the posts at the time those shares were sold with what is a false narrative. I know, surprising to see in the OTC stinky pinks. 🙄 It isn't over by a long shot. They still have convertible debt on the books per the Q3 2024 report filed January 15th and the SEC qualification for the regulation A offering is pending. All this activity is reverse merger related and will run through 2025.

[crowin]

Which part of the RDAR needs more verification?

[BigBadWolf]

Decide which best explains that which is clearly visible on $RDAR's everywhere for yourselves

Personal Bias or Frustration:
They may have had a negative experience with the stock, such as losing money, and their posts reflect their frustration or bias.

Desire for Attention:
Negative posts tend to draw more engagement due to their emotionally charged nature. This can make posters feel validated or "heard."

Discouraging Retail Investors:
In some cases, negative posters may aim to discourage small investors to consolidate holdings among institutional players or their own interests.
Trolling or Emotional Manipulation:
Some individuals enjoy provoking reactions or creating emotional responses without having a genuine stake in the stock or discussion.

As I have said before a Balanced perspectives are valuable on stock boards because every investment has both risks and opportunities. It’s essential to critically evaluate the credibility of each ___________ and their potential motivations, while also conducting your own due diligence as it's your $ your decision(s)

The Good The Bad The Ugly more than willing to compare history(s)
Let us also remember there are No OTC saviors who give a damn about you or any others here.. Fact

your $ base it's use on your DD & Risk vs Rewards standards alone
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175760331&txt2find=painfully

GL w/ any decisions, Buy, Hold, Sell or walk away

[BigBadWolf]

Decide which best explains that which is clearly visible on $RDAR's everywhere for yourselves

Personal Bias or Frustration:
They may have had a negative experience with the stock, such as losing money, and their posts reflect their frustration or bias.

Desire for Attention:
Negative posts tend to draw more engagement due to their emotionally charged nature. This can make posters feel validated or "heard."

Discouraging Retail Investors:
In some cases, negative posters may aim to discourage small investors to consolidate holdings among institutional players or their own interests.
Trolling or Emotional Manipulation:
Some individuals enjoy provoking reactions or creating emotional responses without having a genuine stake in the stock or discussion.

As I have said before a Balanced perspectives are valuable on stock boards because every investment has both risks and opportunities. It’s essential to critically evaluate the credibility of each ___________ and their potential motivations, while also conducting your own due diligence as it's your $ your decision(s)

The Good The Bad The Ugly more than willing to compare history(s)
Let us also remember there are No OTC saviors who give a damn about you or any others here.. Fact

your $ base it's use on your DD & Risk vs Rewards standards alone
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175760331&txt2find=painfully

GL w/ any decisions, Buy, Hold, Sell or walk away