Well that explains the facts behind this share selling misinformation machine of course. The losses dished out to OTC retail to convert debt is amazing even by OTC standards. They have this nonsensical no- split plan yet still need to buy out the previous majority ownership which was originally to be done with the proceeds of the reg A offering. Why hasn't the SEC qualified that offering yet? What do you think happens when they do? 🤔
Decide which best explains that which is clearly visible on $RDAR's everywhere for yourselves
Personal Bias or Frustration: They may have had a negative experience with the stock, such as losing money, and their posts reflect their frustration or bias.
Desire for Attention: Negative posts tend to draw more engagement due to their emotionally charged nature. This can make posters feel validated or "heard."
Discouraging Retail Investors: In some cases, negative posters may aim to discourage small investors to consolidate holdings among institutional players or their own interests. Trolling or Emotional Manipulation: Some individuals enjoy provoking reactions or creating emotional responses without having a genuine stake in the stock or discussion.
As I have said before a Balanced perspectives are valuable on stock boards because every investment has both risks and opportunities. It’s essential to critically evaluate the credibility of each ___________ and their potential motivations, while also conducting your own due diligence as it's your $ your decision(s)
The Good The Bad The Ugly more than willing to compare history(s) Let us also remember there are No OTC saviors who give a damn about you or any others here.. Fact