InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

The Danish Dude

08/01/23 2:45 AM

#615918 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

We just need to point out ONE thing you did during your time as a board moderator,

Pinning the post of Adam Feuerstein arguing the generic branded ATL-DC vaccine used in the UCLA combi trials, were not DCVax-L.

At a time where we had undisputable facts, several UCLA sources, confirmed it was.

That act says everything about why you had that position.

You were always a bear. Always looking for a way to argue against positives. Always able to denigrate milestones.

You were a part of the hardcore disgruntled bear habitat on Ivillage with exwannabe, JRIII, jondoeuk and iclight.

That you leave now, I see as a planned welcome exit opportunity before shit hits the fan and news starts to flow, that will exhibit all you bears scam and manipulative agenda for so many years.

You will start a trend. Just you wait and see.

Pin this.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

abeta

08/01/23 4:02 AM

#615920 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

If nwbo does submit in the UK, I expect it to be rejected. Results are marginal once adjusted for nwbo advantages over competitors in full resection, KPS score, patient health, etc. No patient level data. Way too many warts on a 15+ year trial that went from P2 to P3, upsize, unexplained FDA halt, unbalanced enrollment, etc.


All those ALIVE patients are a real pain in the ass.

When the UK approves - will Adam retract his Dec 2013 hit piece?.

Canada and the USA won't be far behind.

Will Adam then retract his Dec 2013 hit piece?
icon url

Guzzi62

08/01/23 5:45 AM

#615924 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Good riddance
icon url

Idunno

08/01/23 5:50 AM

#615925 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

JC, well, here’s to some good luck, in the future, should you find you need it. Luck, still in the dictionary. A bit after Hope. Dunno.
icon url

Springbok80

08/01/23 7:05 AM

#615929 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

See ya. Let's see how long this lasts.
icon url

CherryTree1

08/01/23 7:05 AM

#615930 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

You missed one.
JerryCampbell - leaving NWBO board being replaced by a yet to be named Big Pharma trained ChatGTP bot because the nay saying drool produced will be far more sophisticated, round-the-clock and far less expensive.
Enjoy your retirement
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

Grip it and Sip It

08/01/23 7:16 AM

#615931 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Jerry - all the best to you! That was a spot-on post!

Hope you find a unicorn out there to get some dollars back. Godspeed!
icon url

jammy32

08/01/23 7:21 AM

#615933 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

What about fireman knowing a guy who knew a guys who’s friends with a gal that knows a guy and that all he can say for now
icon url

jammy32

08/01/23 7:22 AM

#615934 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

You nailed it Jerry. Bunch of hope and hype in my option. What’s factual is the stock price. Down down down.
icon url

hoffmann6383

08/01/23 7:26 AM

#615935 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

JerryCampbell: The guy who stickied an AF post.

^^ all you need to know.

Goodbye. You won't be missed.

edit: Did you sticky that?! LOLOLOLOL
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

newman2021

08/01/23 7:34 AM

#615936 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

hahaha hope you don't come back you fudster; you were never missed anyway and you won't be ever missed for sure. Byeeeeeeeeeeeeee. One less bad guy on this board now.
icon url

AAPL31415926

08/01/23 7:42 AM

#615938 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

A lot of folks have been predicting good news this week.
icon url

beachhyena

08/01/23 7:46 AM

#615939 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

It's funny that one remark you make is to warn all longs to exit once this stock has one final pump above $1.
There must be a plan in place to try and shift the wealth away from longs into your masters hands once we start to hear some positive news. No doubt that plan involves ridiculing the submission of the MAA and pounding the price one last time after the initial upsurge. No doubt this will involve shouting to the world that the MAA will be rejected in the UK and all other jurisdictions.
Your grand exit from this board is to try and create one last final statement of intent and that is to ensure that you leave enough doubt to try and unsettle some longs into letting go of what will be generational wealth if they hang onto those shares.
You and your masters have seriously under estimated the strength and perseverance of NWBO and it's shareholders.
You are about to find out just how serious of a position you are all in. IMO.
icon url

dstock07734

08/01/23 8:36 AM

#615951 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

You will be remembered simply because you manage own $300m fund, which is very lucrative business for a lawyer working on contingency basis.

There is no doubt you and your ilks are going to lose pathetically on the wrong side of the fence.
Bail now or cry later!
icon url

alphapuppy

08/01/23 8:37 AM

#615953 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

What? I am insulted no commentary on the alpha??
icon url

LessIsMore

08/01/23 9:02 AM

#615963 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Good luck JC, one of the good guys!
icon url

HappyLibrarian

08/01/23 9:07 AM

#615969 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Farewell and thank you for the thoughtful analysis though I disagree on the science. I believe that the science should be given a chance in real-life by regulators because leaving all else aside, DCVax-L is safe and has helped some patients, GBM patients are ‘dead anyway’ without a new treatment, Optune is a stop-gap, and regulators can always pull approval and insurers not reimbursing if DCVax-L does not achieve the results expected. Any other alternatives to DCVax-L are ‘on the horizon’ and we as NWBO shareholders know all too well how the horizon works.

Whether regulators will see it my way or your way is hard to say and it’s tough to know but the delay in filing even in the UK (supposedly the most sympathetic regulator) does not bode well. The argument that we’re winding up to throw a big punch all at once sounds like the big talk of timing the JAMA article and TLD together to have maximum impact - it sounded good but reality intervened and we saw how all that has worked out.

Your suggestion on how to handle another run up to $1 is hard to ignore. The problem is that if it is not a false run up as all others have been, saving one’s position means taking the chance life changing gains off the table. That’s not a matter of greed, that’s a matter of being afraid of getting a weak stomach at the last minute and making 10 years be for nothing.

What I hope for is big news and then a run up instead of what we’ve always seen before - a run up on rumor and then a sell off with the actual news.

As far as Linda Powers being able to keep NWBO alive even if we get rejected in the UK - yes she could and even that will not shake the faith of her hardcore supporters who would start saying MHRA is corrupt. I do not think the UK will reject us both nothing would surprise me at this point.
icon url

CrashOverride

08/01/23 9:10 AM

#615973 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Leaving less than 24 hours before WPRI covers DCVax at Lifespan Institute?

Hoffmann and I are very heartbroken.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

jdheart101

08/01/23 9:10 AM

#615975 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Your right bro but the high is worth it , good luck
icon url

McFly021

08/01/23 9:31 AM

#615994 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

You will not be missed.
icon url

miltong

08/01/23 9:36 AM

#615997 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Very little respect I had about this poster is ALL LOST by this outcaste post like a "14 year old" kid on a sedative drug.
icon url

Karlchen

08/01/23 9:46 AM

#616007 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

iknow not much about you. what i know is:

you didn't adress . . . . me
you didn't adress . . . yourself
you didn't adress . . . LL, Bosch, Askhan and the like
you didn't adress . . . . every single scientist of the JAMA journal
you didn't adress . . . . . the science
you didn't adress . . . . . the great achievements, milestones
you didn't adress . . . . . every single surviver
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

TiltMyBrain

08/01/23 9:47 AM

#616008 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Can we get this rant unstickied??? Not worthy
icon url

StonkMaster

08/01/23 10:10 AM

#616024 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Why is this pinned?

What a joke.
icon url

supersteve13

08/01/23 10:10 AM

#616025 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Happy to see you go, :)

What a horrible, horrible moderator. :)
icon url

Kypee

08/01/23 10:18 AM

#616034 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Remove post as stickie and how you judge people like that is not what a mod should do. I did report, but you will prob see it yourself since you are a mod.
icon url

norisknorewards

08/01/23 10:41 AM

#616056 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

so, by
icon url

whosleftholdindabag

08/01/23 11:53 AM

#616101 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Jerry, you're one of the good guys mate!

I never thanked you, but your mention of $TMV got me interested in it. That's one of my top 10 lifetime gains! Thank you, wishing you the best! GLTA
icon url

Dr Bala

08/01/23 12:07 PM

#616112 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

All the best, Jerry. Best to get out when you don't have any skin in the stock.
icon url

biosectinvestor

08/01/23 12:34 PM

#616122 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Being so high up on your list is all the thanks I could wish for…
icon url

Doc logic

08/01/23 2:40 PM

#616163 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

JerryCampbell,

Thanks for helping so many with the financials over the years. Hope you check in when this takes off. As to “platform technology” designation, validation of this is from the science not the regulatory process. They can only confirm what is already known. DCs are platform by design/function, getting them matured and activated properly outside of the body took lots of practice but NWBO cracked the nut so to speak. Hence “platform” is truly the correct understanding whether validated as such by those involved in “the process” yet or not. Coming from the business side I can understand why you would think otherwise but DCs are not business minded, they are business tasked as in taking care of the business of getting rid of non self or non friendly outsiders. Best wishes.
icon url

skitahoe

08/01/23 6:01 PM

#616234 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

I believe that your assumption that the UK and other regulators won't approve is wrong for two reasons. The first is that I believe that DCVax-L will be the first applicant to show it increases 5 year survival dramatically. Granted, other products in trial may be achieving comparable numbers, but not dramatically better. The second, and really most important one is that the regulators are not deaf, dumb, and blind, they know that DCVax-L is opening the door to treatment by a number of existing therapeutics that previously failed in GBM that suddenly take survival at 5 years to 50% or greater, roughly ten times what's achieved by the current SOC. To ignore such information and demand years of additional trials on their part would be malpractice by the regulators IMHO. Likewise, post approval it would be malpractice for a Dr. to use DCVax-L and not use one or more of the existing therapeutics documented to dramatically increase the efficacy of DCVax-L.

Gary
icon url

aesop1

10/13/23 11:19 PM

#640735 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

There might be one more pump if nwbo ever gets around to submitting in the UK. Have a plan. If that gets the stock over $1, stick to your plan and be smart rather than greedy.



Prophetic brother....it got there and dumped because mgt played that same old stupid kick the can game AGAIN. Today was your shot to get out in the 70s. Fresh lows incoming.


If nwbo does submit in the UK, I expect it to be rejected. Results are marginal once adjusted for nwbo advantages over competitors in full resection, KPS score, patient health, etc. No patient level data. Way too many warts on a 15+ year trial that went from P2 to P3, upsize, unexplained FDA halt, unbalanced enrollment, etc.

LP might still try to keep the saga going with the story that some change in FDA regs make the US a better bet. That could also be the excuse if they don't submit in the UK
.

icon url

User-840664

04/17/24 5:53 PM

#685770 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

WOW, that was a great read.. Magnificent post!

Would love to correspond with him... Is he still around?
icon url

User-840664

04/17/24 5:55 PM

#685771 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Are you still around?
icon url

Nemesis18

04/17/24 6:04 PM

#685772 RE: JerryCampbell #615916

Gary …

I believe that your assumption that the UK and other regulators won't approve is wrong for two reasons. The first is that I believe that DCVax-L will be the first applicant to show it increases 5 year survival dramatically. Granted, other products in trial may be achieving comparable numbers, but not dramatically better. The second, and really most important one is that the regulators are not deaf, dumb, and blind, they know that DCVax-L is opening the door to treatment by a number of existing therapeutics that previously failed in GBM that suddenly take survival at 5 years to 50% or greater, roughly ten times what's achieved by the current SOC. To ignore such information and demand years of additional trials on their part would be malpractice by the regulators IMHO. Likewise, post approval it would be malpractice for a Dr. to use DCVax-L and not use one or more of the existing therapeutics documented to dramatically increase the efficacy of DCVax-L.

Gary




skitahoe 6105 - You seem like a nice guy, but please try to be less naive about believing things you WANT to be true.