Replies to post #11291 on United Health Products Inc (UEEC)

[Scumbag Fraudsters]

I AM!

Not that I'm doubting you Wave but...

Investors all have access to the same old public information.

What's NOT public are FDA letters, reports and guidance, or testing results that UHP claims to have received in the past year or so.

Since they're NOT public information and CAN'T be seen by outsiders, it's IMPOSSIBLE for any outsider to provide assurances based on information they haven't seen and can only guess at, and which may not even exist.

Just because the process may have followed a certain path with other companies, doesn't mean this one didn't follow the wrong path and got lost in the woods.

A Cub Scout could have navigated their way through quicker.

[Waverunners]

Sorry for slow reply. I’m only allowed one post a day so won’t be checking in too often.
They’ve had a consultant for a long time.
Somehow he didn’t know that all of this testing had to be done in order for the PMA to progress.
If I knew- please tell me they knew.
If they truly have full access to the consultant and he didn’t advise UHP immediately upon being contracted -and learning that UHP moved factories after human trials.- that they MUST produce USA product, then yes the consultant is “that stupid to make mistakes like this.”

Second inconsistent messaging:

Originally RCA advised that if first test is successful , then within a FEW days the PMA would move forward.
Apparently Test was a success! But then new Test is ordered- why?
They never mentioned this before.
Shouldn’t experts have known this would be needed and if they did why did they say “a few days” originally???

Reason - they screwed up the test process.

Then when they do a complete test the true results come in.

You will know the true level of incompetence when we are still wondering what stage of the process we’re in as we enter 2024!
I ASSURE you.