Saturday, April 01, 2023 2:32:20 PM
Sorry for slow reply. I’m only allowed one post a day so won’t be checking in too often.
They’ve had a consultant for a long time.
Somehow he didn’t know that all of this testing had to be done in order for the PMA to progress.
If I knew- please tell me they knew.
If they truly have full access to the consultant and he didn’t advise UHP immediately upon being contracted -and learning that UHP moved factories after human trials.- that they MUST produce USA product, then yes the consultant is “that stupid to make mistakes like this.”
Second inconsistent messaging:
Originally RCA advised that if first test is successful , then within a FEW days the PMA would move forward.
Apparently Test was a success! But then new Test is ordered- why?
They never mentioned this before.
Shouldn’t experts have known this would be needed and if they did why did they say “a few days” originally???
Reason - they screwed up the test process.
Then when they do a complete test the true results come in.
You will know the true level of incompetence when we are still wondering what stage of the process we’re in as we enter 2024!
I ASSURE you.
They’ve had a consultant for a long time.
Somehow he didn’t know that all of this testing had to be done in order for the PMA to progress.
If I knew- please tell me they knew.
If they truly have full access to the consultant and he didn’t advise UHP immediately upon being contracted -and learning that UHP moved factories after human trials.- that they MUST produce USA product, then yes the consultant is “that stupid to make mistakes like this.”
Second inconsistent messaging:
Originally RCA advised that if first test is successful , then within a FEW days the PMA would move forward.
Apparently Test was a success! But then new Test is ordered- why?
They never mentioned this before.
Shouldn’t experts have known this would be needed and if they did why did they say “a few days” originally???
Reason - they screwed up the test process.
Then when they do a complete test the true results come in.
You will know the true level of incompetence when we are still wondering what stage of the process we’re in as we enter 2024!
I ASSURE you.
Recent UEEC News
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/15/2026 09:11:17 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 08:49:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/02/2026 05:15:10 AM
- Form S-1 - General form for registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:01:16 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/22/2025 10:20:37 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 07:44:29 PM
- Life Sciences Virtual Investor Forum: Presentations Now Available for Online Viewing • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/18/2025 12:35:00 PM
- United Health Products to Present at the Life Sciences Virtual Investor Forum September 18th • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 09/16/2025 08:10:32 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 07:41:41 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/16/2025 01:53:36 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2025 08:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/05/2025 08:15:27 PM
