...Company's shareholders voted in favor of the proposal to authorize and approve the previously signed agreement
Regardless of the changes in share structure after the dividend hijacking, the fact remains the same..... shareholder controlling interest at 90% voted to go private in 2015.
You totally misconstrued my post. That verbiage came from SSM Monopoly’s website under the news of their tickers they are (or were in this case) involved in.
I would love to get some info from SSM on their communications with CRGP during the settlement in giving up custodianship.
After re-reading their news update after the settlement it gives more re-assurance that "The previous management will move forward with CRGP".