Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes. I, too, find it strange that some people are unable to understand the appeal of a good story.
So why no remarks on some of the things the supporters have been saying recently. Do you support their position or do you just like blind optimism?
Wow! I’m speechless at the recent posts. Why would anyone not keep track of the things that are being said on this message board. The level of insanity must be studied.
I never lie. I'm afraid I have no idea where your accusation is coming from, but I suspect it has to do with your own inane insistence that I must have some kind of dog in this fight.
So is lying, but you have no compunction about that...dear
I never shout, dear. That would be bad manners.
Yet here you are...continuing to surveil this board... maintain moderator status and shout your doom and gloom prognosis to anyone who even remotely suggests there is a successful trade to be had here. It's rather bizarre behavior.
Why are you unable to understand that I do not care whether you buy, sell, or hold? I'm interested in the story. Sad to say, it's not as interesting as it once was.
Me too... Holding me tax losses. They sure want us to take that loss don't they Janice.
Okay sweetheart your full of it!
Unregistered securities can be counterfeit especially when a pre borrow exists before a 144 registration lol.
Sorry, Hunny. That is gibberish.
The relationships exist when there is a compromised TRF.
CRGP trades with ORF routing on the Expert Market as we speak. That is part of the ADF pipeline into the ATS.
Dont gaslight the CRGP board!
"CRGP has no such "relationships". Again, you're just writing down words you don't understand. They, and you, make no point."
Unregistered securities can be counterfeit especially when a pre borrow exists before a 144 registration lol.
Nice try Janice. Regsho 203b exists for this reason. Take a hike.
I can't believe there are still people posting on this board and ticker. And I can't believe I actually look here when there are new posts.
I've always found FINRA to be pretty efficient. And their fees are applied mostly to broker-dealers. Those charged to companies--fees for corporate action processing, mostly--are trivial. A few hundred dollars.
De Facto private enforcement wing of the government. Exactly. Even worse. Profit motive. Nonprofit just means they only hold so many millions as a company then pay the rest out to board members and employees. No tax payer money but I sure enough just had a WeBull email about Finra settlement fees increases lol.
The digital asset is already compromised by the derivative and Trust relationships once it has an ETF. The backdoor into the old school routing, quotation, and counterfeiting game.
CRGP has no such "relationships". Again, you're just writing down words you don't understand. They, and you, make no point.
FINRA is absolutely an Unconstitutional and Unworthy Governmental Agency!
FINRA is not a government agency at all.
Devin Nunes has not been a member of congress for several years. And his interminable litigation involving DJT has not been successful. He sues anything that moves, and it just wastes everyone's time.
Diddy. He was laundering hush payments. You know how that goes.
CRGP with unregistered securities aka counterfeit in the system.
Unregistered securities are in no sense "counterfeit". They have simply not been registered with the SEC. They are issued pursuant to an exemption from registration. That is, they may be issued in a Reg D offering. In that case, they're subject to Rule 144. That means it is subject to a holding period. For non-SEC registrants, that period is one year. When it expires, the stock may be traded.
That is what "unregistered stock" is. You are just babbling stuff you don't understand.
Who has been charged with the RICO?
No one involved in the CRGP story has ever been charged with anything. Except for the Beaumont people. The ones in the UK, mostly.
Agreed. The digital asset is already compromised by the derivative and Trust relationships once it has an ETF. The backdoor into the old school routing, quotation, and counterfeiting game.
Its a game of deception. The U3 halt, piggyback exemption, and 15c2-11 Amendment made it easy not to enforce stock settlement, alter security registration, and weaponize quotation and trade reporting. The TRF is compromised and the OTC is the "testing" environment for all criminal activity.
Any share imbalance in the system with CRGP will be exposed.
These institutions are being protected by the same system that allows unlimited corporate donations. The government and establishment class will always attempt to control supply and profit abilities to their favor while claiming it's for our protection or greater good. They will eventually go after Bitcoin because the government and the central banking system can't control it unless it's already a CIA created asset 😂.
FINRA is absolutely an Unconstitutional and Unworthy Governmental Agency!
You can look up Nunes April 23rd letter for requesting RICO be a part of a Congressional investigation regarding the same institutions compromising assets in the financial system. The same institutions that controlled the artificial supply and demand of CRGP among many others.
Interesting that you say basket. Consolidated omnibus accounts?
How many OTC securities are leveraged together?
CRGP with unregistered securities aka counterfeit in the system.
How many times was this ticker compromised by a broker dealer, market maker and/or a counterparty?
(Keep in mind an ISSUER inside an Institutional Index Fund (Trust) "Small Cap" has borrowers with foriegn custodian exemptions) for example 17 CFR 270 F5
Who has been charged with the RICO? Searching DOJ.gov right now.
Wow, you're a deflection master! Especially when it comes to RICO pertaining to counterfeiting of securities on the OTC via CRGP.
Wow. That's one of the craziest things I've read here. Which is really saying something.
I believe there is a fear of TRF exposure. The OTC has an AutoRouting and Auto XTrade programming built into their ADF (OTC Link) relationship with FINRA and UTP relationship with Nasdaq. Looks like a print image protocol is used for manual trade processing. Interesting that GTS has the technology for this type of routing too. Makes it easy to press that F3 button aka 203b/PFOF processing.
It really begs a few questions:
Is FINRA operating an unregistered exchange (ATS) via venues to hide the counterfeiting of securities in the market?
Did the OTC have a malicious Print Server technology which compromised the Reporting and Trade Quotation technology shared by all broker dealers and market makers in the financial system? Was the James Angel patent(s) used in DirectEdge and Global Arca implementation inside dark pools for rehypothication and counterfeiting operations?
Did FINRA know the IDQS was an interface to control artificial liquidity and steal assets?
Why does FINRA have so many committee's that are defacto ADVISORS to halt and/or manipulate supply and demand in the marketplace?
Was the CRGP U3 halt influenced by an ADVISORY body unappointed by Constitutional CLAUSE?
Does the 2024 SCOTUS CHEVRON Doctrine decision open up legal arguments for STATES to challenge SRO controls over private and public property?
Yup, those committee's!
A few new posters popping up in here. Seems odd for such a "dead" stock that will never trade again. How does someone even stumble across this board? Just totally spontaneous I'm sure 🙄.
All it means is that the SEC ALJs (Administrative Law Judges) won't be used as much as they once were. And in fact, the SEC adapted to that in the wake of Lucia.
So the Chevron decision won't really make much of a difference. It will make a difference to other government agencies and entities. Like the military, which has its own military courts.
There are only two SEC ALJs left. There used to be five.
Does anyone know how or if the recent Supreme Court ruling will affect the SEC (and therefore FINRA) ability and authority to engage in rulemaking? I am referring to the overruling of the CHEVRON DOCTRINE. I believe the ruling occurred in June or July of this year
They are likely trying to figure out a way to re-open trading because their broker buddies now have huge inventories of stock at rock bottom prices and nobody to sell them to.
Nobody seems to know. OTCM keeps flip flopping their original proposal.
I'm afraid you're wrong again. What interests me is OTC Markets suddenly changing the "Expert Market" to the "Expert Restricted Market".
And it would also be nice to know why US brokers haven't allowed their customers to buy those Expert Market stocks since September 2021. I'd never looked to see if they explained. They don't, really. This is what they say:
Issuers of OTC equity securities that fail to make current financial and other information publicly available, are insolvent, are under regulatory investigation or suspension, or are otherwise not in compliance with public company reporting requirements may become restricted to the “Expert Market.” In the event an OTC equity security that you own or may own in the future is classified as an “Expert Market” security, you may be prevented from selling that OTC equity security and the value of your OTC equity security may be significantly negatively affected or eliminated entirely. Specifically, opening transactions in “Expert Market” securities are not permitted and closing transactions in “Expert Market” securities will only be permitted under limited circumstances, subject to certain qualifications and restrictions.
https://us.etrade.com/l/f/disclosure-library/otc
They do actually do a good job. But I'll leave you to your conspiracy theories.
What are the new OTCM changes coming?
You've got yourself all worked up again. The topic of CRGP actively trading again really has you going bananas.
And a fine job they do 🙄. Their staff are probably the worst offenders.
Broker-dealers are generally okay with FINRA. Their objections tend to be about technical issues.
When they do have a grievance, they're often helped by SIFMA.
Finra is a private nonprofit that has how much of a budget per year? The SEC is contracting it's job out to a private side nonprofit in Finra that is the only option for dealers. Finra as it's own lawyers argue is not a government agency. The government shouldn't be in the position of having the only regulation option available for USA dealers without being locked out of the markets being a private business. Board Members of Finra have a conflict of interest. It's SEC isn't officially contracting it's job out with government contracts but a private business is being allowed to set the market with rules and regulations that influence the amount of fees and fines the nonprofit lol operate off of. It's unconstitutional
It is not "contracting its job out to anyone". And, though you probably don't know this, FINRA celebrated its 85th anniversary this past September. It was created only five years after the SEC.
https://www.finra.org/compliance-tools/weekly-archive/09042024
Exactly. If the SEC is going to contract it's Job out to the private side (Finra) then it should be broken up into multiple contacts to different companies.
FINRA is, nonetheless, a regulator. It is, in turn, regulated by the SEC.
Followers
|
296
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
55159
|
Created
|
06/19/12
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators janice shell onehundredmph Cologne9672 |
Certificate of Reistatement - Nevada Department of State |
New Director and Reduction from 145B shares to 3.475B in Authorized Shares |
03/01/2021 |
Battle for custodianship in Clark County court |
Fishy Conversions Check: - The "a" in Scottdale, the "3" in 390. - The shifted tail of the 2nd "7" in the account number - The tip of the tail of the "7" can still be seen in the date of the 2nd. document - Portions of the deleted signature covering the same letters in Signature of Holder and Name of Holder. - 2nd. document shows bold letters and lower resolution. Image was scanned and modified. 2nd document is a counterfeit, used to create air shares and dump into the market. Those air shares were not shorted, but behave like shorts. |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |