You totally misconstrued my post. That verbiage came from SSM Monopoly’s website under the news of their tickers they are (or were in this case) involved in.
I would love to get some info from SSM on their communications with CRGP during the settlement in giving up custodianship.
After re-reading their news update after the settlement it gives more re-assurance that "The previous management will move forward with CRGP".