SSM could not get custodianship over a private company. And if SSM purchased shares on the open market...then a settlement for those shares was very probable in a private transaction.
SSM made that public statement about CRGP because it was in agreement. There was a stipulation, remember???
"The previous management will move forward with CRGP"
because the shares (share structure) existing in the market needs to be addressed. CRGP is 1000% stronger in their defense to go private without any other setbacks/hijacking attempts. Just thinking outside the box here and sharing what makes legal and logical sense.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
