Replies to post #338230 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[eightisenough]

post--it isn't bogus sadly--biased v. common argument. Until fraud proven must assume innocent. Sorry for the reality. Appeal is a long shot after du rejected for standing---if rejection for fraud (60) much better chance.

We will win w/ infringement--no worry.

9

[Jasbg]

postes@ I have to agree with You here. Amarin were killed by the ruling of Judge Du - now proven to be based on Fraud.
----------------------------

Hikma has 780 + products. https://www.hikma.com/products/

The case against Amarin - is a typical examble om how they have build their business. Anda cases in Courts is routine for them - that is what their specialized Law team does/how they progress.
------------

So that the inconvenience argument for Hikma - ways more than the Fraud that killed Amarin valuation (opened the door for generics) is an absolute nonsense invalid argument no matter how you look at it.

Jasbg