News Focus
News Focus
icon url

louieblouie

03/24/21 6:38 AM

#331084 RE: alm2 #331076

Ohh! Ohh! Ohh!!!
Me first! Me first!!!

I pick DOOR NUMBER FOUR!!!!!
icon url

couldbebetter

03/24/21 7:06 AM

#331087 RE: alm2 #331076

#4 is a Catch-22 for AMRN management. If they show support for rule 60
they have to admit their own negligence in not having caught the errors.
Then, if they ignore rule 60 they are blatantly demonstrating their lack
of fiduciary responsibility. I guess if their decision to ignore rule 60
sticks, it is probably a worse decision by JT and team. The phrase
"stupid is as stupid does" comes to mind. Sadly, seems we cannot expect
anything less from JT.
icon url

Biobillionair

03/24/21 9:14 AM

#331094 RE: alm2 #331076

Why did Amarin not bring Rule 60 ?


I believe Marjac has emails that sheds light on this and he has my public permission to use them.

BB
icon url

Whalatane

03/24/21 12:17 PM

#331122 RE: alm2 #331076

alm2 thx ...I'll ( unfortunately ) go with 4.
Rule 60 exposes them ( AMRN ) to possible legal class action .

Who reviews the rule 24 filing ...Judge Du ? The first hurdle is ..." You shareholders are represented by Amarin's legal counsel .
If they felt there was no merit to filing a rule 60 motion ...why would you ."...is that about "the guts of it " ?
Kiwi