AMARIN HAS FAILED TO COMMENT ON THE RULE 60 CASE UP TILL NOW
Possible assumptions we can make about Amarin management's failure to comment on such an important development as the rule 60 case...
1. Management feels that the rule 60 case is doomed to failure(even though we shareholders think it has a fighting chance for success)
2. When/if it fails, Management would be blamed for putting the case at a disadvantage by voicing their own negative opinion.
3. If they voice a negative opinion now and it turns out to be wrong, they might lose their jobs for being so dismissive of shareholders, despite a stunning success for Amarin.
4. When/if management is correct about the inevitable failure of the rule 60 case, they can put out a statement that the rule 60 effort was a lost cause from the start and they can encourage the shareholders/sheep to mind their own business and let management do its work without being pestered by the upstart, know nothing shareholders.