Who cares if that is subjective? The 1st part of the sentence is categorically false, thus the 2nd part should be meaningless.
It's like saying: 1) because you robbed a bank, 2) you should spend 10 years in prison.... when in reality, you did not rob a bank. So not only is the 2nd part not subjective, its just gibberish and irrelevant.
In light of the statistically-significant differential effects reported between the EPA and control groups, a POSA would have attributed the reduction in Apo B to EPA. (Id. at 737:24-738:8.).
The control group vs the epa group were not statistically significant. The statistical significance was established from the variance between measures of the EPA group having a P value of <.001. When compared against the control group (using t-method), it was deemed not significant. This is an error relating to a Judge that doesn't know math/science and simply took a document the defendant provided in their throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks methodology.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
