InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 644
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/12/2013

Re: circuitcity post# 262561

Sunday, 04/05/2020 5:36:48 PM

Sunday, April 05, 2020 5:36:48 PM

Post# of 424139
This is not subjective

In light of the statistically-significant differential effects reported between the EPA and control groups, a POSA would have attributed the reduction in Apo B to EPA. (Id. at 737:24-738:8.).

The control group vs the epa group were not statistically significant. The statistical significance was established from the variance between measures of the EPA group having a P value of <.001. When compared against the control group (using t-method), it was deemed not significant. This is an error relating to a Judge that doesn't know math/science and simply took a document the defendant provided in their throw a bunch of shit at the wall and see what sticks methodology.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News