Replies to post #71664 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[Scruffer]

If remember correctly, think read post...

...or Pacer (or something) where defense may or is going to try to tie '822 to the other 2 patents somehow.

Isn't your older brother zw? He should know. How far are apart do you live?

Also, here they are. Please tell us, if know or learn.

"RF Channel" totals:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=150379522

Patents:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=150381784

I need to print the 3 patents, reread them and dissect.

Going to get some lunch,

Hungry Scruff

[jesuslovzu]

So my take from what I've read here and the glance I've taken at the patent, my thinking is that 822' was designed to be very broad, cover all contingencies, future infringements, creative work arounds, etc. I've heard it on here described as the 'bells and whistles' of the other two so I went in thinking that, but from my layperson's reading that's what it looked like.

I see this situation as our basic patents are clearly being infringed so the others cover it, but 822 is the icing on the cake and removes any creative outs the Cisco et al lawyers might try to concoct to weasel their way out of it.

Just my take.

[Targun]

I remember reading 822 patent happens to be a core patent so we need to win the Cisco appeal if we want this to be over in a year with a good pps.
Otherwise this could take up to 5 more years with the other 2 patents we have, at trail with endless appeals then less pps IMO
Still positive tho but I have my breaking points too.