Moderators: shajandr , TCaine , long uoip
Search This Board: 
Created: 02/11/2006 09:40:10 PM - Followers: 501 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0


UnifiedOnline, Inc. (Delisted ticker: UOIP)

Active patent case v 13 high-tech companies

FINRA ticker was revoked on July 17, 2019

UOIP is no longer trading on Gray Market







THE LATEST AND GREATEST NEWS ON UOIP'S DAVID VS 13 GOLIATHS:



ORDER Regarding consolidation (D.I. [442],[445], [447]). The parties should meet and confer about requests 4 and 5 (see Order), and submit

responses to all requests by no later than November 13, 2019 (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews 11/4/2019.



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2XB2ZoMDqfGTjM1aWVfcWc2STNBZlpnYThPWGRTQUpPOUdR/view





On to a full trial v 13 others or a settlement




https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2019/34-86389.pdf









Late CEO Robert "Rob" Maull Howe III
(Late Company President and Secretary)

Executive Profile: The late "Rob" Howe was
the CEO, President, and the Secretary of the
UnitedOnline, Inc. until his passing in 2018.

"Rob" received a baccalaureate degree from
Birmingham Southern College and received
his master's degree from Auburn University.




 
A History: UnifiedOnline, Inc. (the “Company”) began trading publicly in April 2002.  During the six months ended Dec. 31, 2015 we had three wholly owned operating subsidiaries, Computers & Telecom, Inc. and KCNAP, LLC, (collectively “CTC) and IceWEB Storage Corporation (formerly known as Inline Corporation).  CTC provides wireless and fiber broadband service, co-location space and related services and operates a Network Access Point (“NAP”) where customers directly interconnect with a network ecosystem of partners and customers.  This access to Internet routes provides CTC customers improved reliability and streamlined connectivity while significantly reducing costs by reaching a critical mass of networks within a centralized physical location.  In addition, through our IceWEB Storage Corporation subsidiary we deliver on-line cloud computing application services, other managed services such as Disaster Recovery, Archive Storage, Redundant File Storage, Redundant Broadband Services and Business Continuity Services.CTC operates a wireless internet service business, providing WIMAX broadband to small and medium size businesses in the metro Kansas-City, Missouri area.  In addition, CTC offers the following solutions: (i) premium data center co-location, (ii) interconnection and (iii) exchange and outsourced IT infrastructure services. We leverage our NAP which allows our customers to increase information and application delivery performance while reducing costs.  Our platform enables scalable, reliable and cost-effective co-location, interconnection and traffic exchange thus lowering overall cost and increasing flexibility. On Oct. 27, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interest ChanBond, LLC (ChanBond), a portfolio of patents that disclose technology that allows cable companies to provide high-speed data transmission over their existing hybrid-fiber coaxial networks. The Company entered into a purchase agreement with Deirdre Leane and ChanBond, LLC, pursuant to which the Company purchased Chanbond, in exchange for $5,000,000 payable on or before Oct. 27, 2020, and a shares payment of forty-four million, seven hundred thousand (44,700,000) shares of the Company’s common stock. William R. Carter, Jr. (a related party to the Company) was appointed as sole manager who shall have sole and exclusive authority over the business of ChanBond. ChanBond consists of a portfolio of patents that disclose technology that allows cable companies to provide high-speed data transmission over their existing hybrid-fiber coaxial networks. The purchase of ChanBond included acquisition of intangibles currently valued at $5,223,500. The initial accounting for the business combination of ChanBond with the Company is not complete as the Company is working on obtaining valuation reports to support amounts. The Company may record possible contingent assets due to the lawsuits to which ChanBond is currently a plaintiff.  ChanBond contends that virtually every cable multi-system operator (MSO) in the U.S. utilizing DOCSIS 3.0+ is infringing upon its patents, and accordingly, on Sept. 21, 2015 ChanBond filed lawsuits in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the 13 largest cable MSOs in the country.
 

 
AMENDED LITIGATION SCHEDULING ORDER(S)  


   
 
 

ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

A little more detail on Chanbond/Cisco appeal. 

- Court started Calendar Stage with date of hearing to be scheduled by Oct 2019 and requesting scheduling conflicts. 
- Both sides submitted their conflicts in March. 
- Court hears argument only in 1st week of a month (except July is 2nd week) 
- Court Calendar currently does not show Chanbond /Cisco in June or July schedule- that leaves Aug, Sept, & Oct. 

If curious, check Court Calendar out at: 
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 
http://cafc.uscourts.gov/argument/upcoming-oral-arguments


The life of an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules-of-practice/notices/Life_of_an_Appeal_Narrative_and_flowchart.pdf





DUE DILIGENCE LINKS FOR DOING RESEARCH


Court Case: https://search.rpxcorp.com/ent/969818-chanbond-llc

Court Proceedings Schedule
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140085257

Decision for Cisco (~1/3rd of -822 patent unpatentable) / Appeal filed by UOIP:
April 26, 2018: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24339392/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cisco_Systems,_Inc
February 24, 2018: https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1469056/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmM4MTRkODEtNjI0OS00YmI1LTg0NDUtNjMwNTg4MWYzMGFkOzEuMA====/anonymousDownload

Willful Infringement for treble damages (3x standard) / Deposition of Comcast SVP (Intellectual Proporty Strategy):
April 10, 2018: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139940185
September 15, 2017: http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf

RPX Can't appeal:
Jan 17, 2018: https://www.bna.com/patent-risk-defense-n73014474290/

PTAB Decision for UOIP:
April 3, 2017: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/chanbond-avoids-institution-six-cisco-ipr-petitions
March 30, 2017: https://www.law360.com/articles/907966/ptab-nixes-six-cisco-ipr-petitions-over-networking-patents

Markman Hearing for UOIP:
Dec 9, 2016: https://www.morrisjames.com/assets/htmldocuments/patent%20blog%20-%20Chanbond%20-%201826.pdf

Pacer Court Updates (MSO's):
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426386/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Atlantic_Broadband_Group,_LLC
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426387/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Bright_House_Networks,_LLC
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426388/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cable_One_Inc
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426389/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cablevision_Systems_Corporation_et_al
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426390/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cequel_Communications,_LLC_et_al
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426391/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Charter_Communications,_Inc
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426392/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Comcast_Corporation_et_al
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426393/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cox_Communications,_Inc_et_al
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426394/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Mediacom_Communications_Corporation
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426395/ChanBond,_LLC_v_RCN_Telecom_Services,_LLC
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426396/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Time_Warner_Cable_Inc_et_al
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426397/ChanBond,_LLC_v_WaveDivision_Holdings,_LLC
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426398/ChanBond,_LLC_v_WideOpen_West_Finance,_LLC

Patents:
http://www.channelbondingvideo.com/Technology.html
-918: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7346918B2
-822: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7941822B2
-679: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8341679
-565: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8984565B2
-774: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9015774B2
Pending: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130266050A1
Pending: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140150038A1

Background on Billy Carter (Holds 900 million shares of UOIP):
July 13, 2013: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/business/how-a-typical-patent-battle-took-an-unexpected-turn.html

UOIP's lawyer, Robert Whitman:
http://www.mishconnewyork.com/people/robert_whitman



RECENT ARTICLES ON LITIGATION:

https://www.law360.com/articles/907966/ptab-nixes-six-cisco-ipr-petitions-over-networking-patents

http://www.natlawreview.com/article/chanbond-avoids-institution-six-cisco-ipr-petitions
 
PTAB Nixes Six Cisco IPR Petitions Over Networking Patents
By Kelcee Griffis

Law360, New York (March 30, 2017, 5:59 PM EDT) -- The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has denied six petitions for inter partes review launched by Cisco Systems Inc., shooting down the company’s bid to invalidate two high-speed networking patents held by ChanBond LLC. In declining to review the two relevant patents, the PTAB said Wednesday that Cisco failed to show that the patents are likely invalid after ChanBond asserted the patents against a group of telecom companies. ChanBond has been active in asserting the patents against major cable companies including Charter Communications Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Comcast Corp. and others, court records show. In response, Cisco filed six separate IPR challenges with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in September 2016. Now, the PTAB says Cisco has not proved that it can be successful in invalidating the challenged claims. Both of the challenged patents cover a “system and method for distribution of digital signals onto, and off of, a wideband signal distribution system,” according to case documents. Andrea Pacelli, an attorney with Mishcon de Reya New York LLP who represented ChanBond, told Law360 on Thursday that the board’s decision focused on two elements: claims construction regarding the term “RF channel” and analysis of potential prior art references that Cisco had put forth. The board found that the term “RF channel” should be given the "broadest reasonable interpretation." As such, it does not include “code channels” such as data streams and only applies to frequency bands. The PTAB also said that asserted prior art references can’t be combined to reach the patents at issue. “We agree with patent owner that petitioner does not show adequately that any of the cited portions of the prior art references teach modulating digital information into at least two separate RF channels as required by each of the challenged claims,” the board said. Robert Whitman, ChanBond lead attorney, said in a Thursday statement that the company was pleased that the PTAB agreed with ChanBond "on virtually all issues." “The board’s decision confirms the strength of ChanBond’s patents,” he said. Counsel for Cisco declined to comment Thursday. The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,341,679 and 8,894,565. ChanBond is represented by Robert Whitman, Timothy Rousseau, Andrea Pacelli and John Petrsoric of Mishcon de Reya New York LLP. Cisco is represented by Wayne Stacy and Kathryn Juffa of Baker Botts LLPThe cases are Cisco Systems Inc. v. ChanBond LLC, case nos. IPR2016-01889/IPR2016-01890/IPR2016-01898/IPR2016-0189/IPR2016-01899/IPR2016-01900, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. --Editing by Sara Ziegler

Judge:
Case #:
1:15-cv-00842
  Nature of Suit
830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
                           Case Filed:
      Sep 21, 2015
 
 
 


The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.001 par value:

Outstanding at February 15, 2016 was: 1,011,928,504

Insider ownership per filing: 903,325,954


Some Possible Settlement Amounts / Outstanding Shares:

   
  $10 million settlement: $0.01 PPS
  $50 million settlement: $0.05 PPS
$100 million settlement: $0.10 PPS
$250 million settlement: $0.25 PPS
$500 million settlement: $0.50 PPS

A $1 billion settlement: $1.00 PPS
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


MOST RECENT CHART





CONFIRMATION THAT CHANBOND IS A SUBSIDIARY OF UOIP


10/9/2018 Certificate of Interest (Form 9) with share relationship between Chanbond and UOIP


https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Aece6aafa-9f19-41d3-a54f-5a9861e7c350


https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2019/34-86389.pdf



 
TonyJoe1957 Member Level  Wednesday, 07/14/21 12:29:46 PM
Re: jbbb post# 89483 0.010
Post #  of 89526 
 
$1.50 PPS offer accepted?

PS: Sorry, folks, but I am trying to work a deal with Billy and his pal. If anyone else is willing to accept $1.50 PPS, below the estimated $1.75 to $2.25 PPS, please feel free to chime in.





$UOIP

 
PlusOneCoin Top Posts Free PlusOneCoin
No plusone'd posts yet. Be the first!
Post Subject
#95537
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE long uoip 08/03/2022 08:59:05 PM
#95173
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE long uoip 06/09/2022 02:33:37 PM
#95673
Today is Ultra Vires Sunday. Billy will be shajandr 09/25/2022 03:33:03 AM
#95672
It`s a Billy Weekend!!! Billy is a fine shajandr 09/23/2022 10:38:22 PM
#95670
Chump coins depleting as the lawyers` clocks tick away. shajandr 09/21/2022 09:19:31 PM
#95669
We still have our received recite from when justus1 09/21/2022 10:17:27 AM
#95668
A Certified Letter doesn't demand anything other than imp82 09/21/2022 03:30:22 AM
#95667
Thanks, long uoip, for sharing. You‘re da best. TCaine 09/20/2022 04:43:00 PM
#95666
The Fickle Finger of Failure will propound: shajandr 09/18/2022 06:47:37 PM
#95665
Cha-ching!! $$$$$$ shajandr 09/17/2022 12:30:53 PM
#95664
147 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Chanbond LLC's Objections long uoip 09/16/2022 08:46:56 PM
#95662
Zombywolfmom here. It would be funny if we zombywolf 09/16/2022 01:44:28 PM
#95661
Certified letters should be sent now. They would shajandr 09/16/2022 01:15:44 PM
#95659
Subpenny trash shajandr 09/15/2022 08:26:34 PM
#95658
Maybe good and bad. Good stuff is that zombywolf 09/10/2022 10:59:15 AM
#95657
Rookie judge = mucho pretrial ruling appeals to shajandr 09/09/2022 11:33:04 PM
#95656
Thanks....this does sound like good news, although it VC3 09/09/2022 07:57:05 PM
#95655
new judge ~ case assigned to Gregory B. long uoip 09/09/2022 07:51:28 PM
#95654
Many thanks! VC3 09/08/2022 12:52:13 PM
#95652
Thanks....any link or explanation. Hope you're well. VC3 09/07/2022 07:38:45 PM
#95651
DOCKET ~ "Case Assigned/Reassigned" long uoip 09/07/2022 07:36:07 PM
#95649
What do you mean by 'our case'?? shajandr 09/07/2022 07:02:36 PM
#95646
Hi long uoip - any news in our VC3 09/07/2022 04:08:19 PM
#95641
It is PPer Wipe~OUTT and Writedown Wednesday as shajandr 09/07/2022 12:58:09 PM
#95640
https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2022/6/11/jphrpUOIPPP6jc5zh.jpg shajandr 09/02/2022 12:29:59 PM
#95639
Its a Billy Labour Day weekend!!! shajandr 09/02/2022 11:44:24 AM
#95637
This turd subpennyscam is always good for a laff. shajandr 08/31/2022 08:33:06 PM
#95636
’’a lawyers’ income dream’’ shajandr 08/31/2022 05:44:44 PM
#95635
Thanks. So on to May 2023 it is. TCaine 08/31/2022 08:15:15 AM
#95634
It is Ultra Vires Tuesday at Radar and shajandr 08/30/2022 06:14:15 PM
#95631
Perfect examples of why the clubhouse is so zombywolf 08/29/2022 06:15:39 PM
#95630
The only parties who have gotten anything out AllinFun 08/29/2022 05:51:56 PM
#95628
G Coll, our shell has to have some zombywolf 08/29/2022 05:47:05 PM
#95627
Butt it is nott upp to her - shajandr 08/26/2022 02:02:28 PM
#95626
The very best in the business are the GColl 08/26/2022 01:22:58 PM
#95625
146 NOTICE OF SERVICE of discovery requests long uoip 08/26/2022 01:10:01 PM
#95624
Nope. I am wholly unfamiliar with the Philippine shajandr 08/26/2022 05:41:23 AM
#95623
That is many millions of $$$ of billing shajandr 08/26/2022 05:27:28 AM
#95622
I see what you mean. I searched under zombywolf 08/25/2022 10:33:24 PM
#95621
If you Google SEC Memorandum Circular No. 23, sotbuster 08/25/2022 09:44:00 PM
#95620
Basically what it says is that a company zombywolf 08/25/2022 07:48:44 PM
#95619
Can you post a link for that? All sotbuster 08/25/2022 05:11:52 PM
#95617
Are you familiar with SEC Memorandum Circular No. zombywolf 08/25/2022 02:43:44 PM
#95616
145 SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery completed by long uoip 08/25/2022 02:42:54 PM
#95614
It was a nice thought anyway. zombywolf 08/25/2022 02:08:07 PM
#95612
WronGGG! UOIP has been revoked by the SEC shajandr 08/25/2022 12:47:56 PM
#95611
A thought just came to me while posting zombywolf 08/25/2022 11:56:15 AM
#95610
I wouldnt exactly say that the shareholders are zombywolf 08/25/2022 11:16:33 AM
#95609
No question. And if she prevails in the zombywolf 08/25/2022 10:58:55 AM
#95607
Presenting some wisdom and desperately needed advice for shajandr 08/25/2022 03:31:10 AM
#95606
That was said about the arbitration. Leane seems sotbuster 08/24/2022 11:31:12 PM
#95605
Of course this may all be moot when zombywolf 08/24/2022 11:07:41 PM
Post Subject