'822 = 24 times > "RF" implied thru-out v. Cisco's broader channel definition '679 = 116 times '565 = 99 times
I'm not sure how relevant the appeal is considering the "EXACT" specifications of the other 2 patents.
Each patent and claims, I'm sure, is based on it's own merits, but if took the totality of the 3 patents together, "RF" would be implied throughout '822.
Also, I liked his last 2 minute rebuttal. Put focus back on point.
Lastly, thank you all for everything, all the great info and being eyes.
Unprecedented Onslaught Is Preeminent against the MSOs, fka UOIP.