I will have to go back and look to see the time frames of the 3 patents. It is probably the case that the 822 patent was written first, and the other two came in later and fixed some of the patent language. There was a statement from one of the judges that the language in the other two patents was clearer on RF, hence the reason they held up at the PTAB on the RF channel issue. Everyone has to understand these issues will be hashed out at trial, and when all three are combined, our lawyers should be able to get the jury to understand the real meaning of the language for RF and channels. Was not the case at the CAFC. Now that we are a private company, I believe we could get some info from the inventors on this. We dont have the SEC restrictions now to discuss this with them.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
