Why Garret did not include in the deal that Solomon get rid of his A-shares but keeping Solomon in the presidency ?. This would have favored the entry of institutional investors and would have facilitated the search for a successor in the future (Solomon's age is other problem).
Here those who lose are always the small shareholders ...
emptyone To me it seems obvious the added uncertainty of the terms of the loan Garrett has given will have a negative effect on the pps and play into the hands of possible shorts. To the extent that SIAF sells more shares a lower pps will increase dilution. Since Garrett has milions of shares increased dilution will affect him in a very negative way. Why does not he now take an initiative to change the terms of the deal when the pps has gone much lower than he expected if he is on our side? It does not make sense.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
