News Focus
News Focus
icon url

biosectinvestor

09/03/17 11:18 AM

#132861 RE: HappyLibrarian #132842

Given the well funded short attacks that it seems apparent that they've been subjected to, and the success of those attacks, smart validation (and this is understood across the industry with most of the tiny biotechs subjected to these attacks) typically is most wisely pursued by publication in a credible journal. Just PR'ing what they think they have, is likely going to result in their being shouted down and the results being lost in noisy, nonsensical technical speak that makes the positive results disappear into obscurity. Have we seen that before? You bet!
icon url

kabunushi

09/03/17 12:14 PM

#132882 RE: HappyLibrarian #132842

This '6 months to publication' sounds like fake nonsense. A medical researcher I know said he published 5 articles and it took 3 months from submission to being published. I think that they might be able to shave maybe as much as 1 month off that if they had a highly cooperative editor, maybe not. But in any case where you are getting 6 months from? Did you pick that number out of your hat or are you claiming some actual experience and/or link to reliable neutral sources?