News Focus
News Focus
icon url

mickeybritt

07/29/17 7:57 PM

#418475 RE: loophole73 #418474

loophole



Since you are attorney and seem to think Microsoft owes around $600,000

would you withdraw all legal action and not see the money or have something

in writing saying what the other side would do? Only a damn fool would

withdraw all legal action and not have something in writing. Now the

withholding of what was agreed on could be subject to legal action also.

Microsoft clearly although it has disappeared but clearly stated IDCC was

seeking 3 billion. How much has Samsung paid over the same time frame

that Nokia was top dog on selling handsets as well as infrastructure.

Something in my opinion was agreed on or we have the biggest idiots and

lawyers known to mankind, so what the hell was it?


Maybe you could file something to get this information released.



JMO
Mickey
icon url

olddog967

07/29/17 10:06 PM

#418476 RE: loophole73 #418474

loophole: Well stated, I have long argued about the supposed $3 billion owed by Microsoft/ Nokia.

As usual IDCC’s settlement announcement leaves many unanswered question, one of which is the period covered by the limited release of past sales.

“Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, in exchange for cash and other commitments from Microsoft, InterDigital has agreed to a limited release on the past sales of certain Microsoft products, including Nokia terminal units sold during a limited period of time. InterDigital and Microsoft also have agreed to terms for dismissal by them and Nokia Corporation of all outstanding litigation……”

What we know from the 2nd qtr 10-Q is that as part of the agreement Microsoft paid paid IDCC approximately $46 million for past sales.

(“The $59.9 million increase in total revenue was primarily driven by the increase in past patent royalties of $46.6 million primarily due to the Microsoft Settlement Agreement signed during second quarter 2017.”)

Since all current litigation between the parties was dismissed, any legal attempt to collect for past infringement would require the filing on new cases. Since damages for past infringement is limited to the six years prior to the filing of the complaint, even if the settlement period is limited and new cases were filed immediately (which I doubt), damages at most would be limited to Microsoft/Nokia production since mid 2011. In that regard the following cite has a chart showing Microsoft/Nokia’s quarterly mobile phone sales from 2010 thru 1st qtr 2016. As can be seen there was a very significant drop in mobile phone sales from over 100 million units per quarter to approximately 20 million units.

http://www.businessinsider.com/nokia-mobile-phone-sales-by-year-2016-5