Replies to post #36928 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[TASBES0101]

This looks like a product to me.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10154390365458716&id=600788715

[ricanich]

What court is this Decn shareholder approved lawsuit filed?

What sweetheart deals were given? Why don't you post them.

[DrZem]

Excellent Summary!

Thanks again for another great, credible post.

[DrZem]

Tomorrow I plan to explore the sweetheart deals

I expect this to be VERY interesting.

[DrZem]

Tomorrow I plan to explore the sweetheart deals

I hope, and expect this to be VERY interesting.

[Johnny_C]

Good luck with that suit... Based on the actions of Berman, DECN and the BOD I think you would be hard pressed to find any libel. In fact, I think that TAUG has a great case against Berman and the DECN Board.

By the way, can you ask Berman if he called Seth and wanted shares in TAUG last weekend? LOL

The internet stalking is funny to. Looks like people from all walks like to correct Berman's pal and DECN's misrepresentations online. Look at all the money DECN has lost investors, i can't see why most people would not consider Berman a dirtbag. The list is long of sketchy of Berman's bad conduct. As he is the face of DECN, he should face the music.

TAUG may end up with a windfall from this.

[clearmont88]

i find that post to be malicious and offensive. And blatantly false

And it's become a daily thing. Not bright

[DrZem]

Excellent Summary!

Eagerly awaiting your update.

[Johnny_C]

Let's take stock of TAUG....it has managed to get through 1 year and a half trying to get audited financials back on track. TAUG has done so despite Cowan not cooperating and transferring the Company's work papers in a timely manner.

The company is in a somewhat state of limbo as it is very difficult to make any deal with other companies that are looking to go public until the lawsuit is resolved, TAUG should then have recouped expenses and whatever damages are adjudicated, including the possibility of punitive damages. It appears that the trial date will be sooner than later based on discovery schedules.

Despite this, TAUG is launching what I think could be an exciting product based on CBD oil, which by all indications is very effective as a muscle relaxant which could minimize certain pains. The company has also entered into an agreement to market a very exciting lip balm. I don't think anybody has claimed that these products are going to turn TAUG into a half a billion company, but they certainly could generate nice cash flow and put TAUG in a much better position to do some M&A. Contrary to some posting here, TAUG's Board of Advisor is very senior in emerging markets and has extensive distribution contacts.

Now, as to the illegal sweetheart deals, why don't you list them. list the illegal sweetheart deals given to a consultant for investing a small amount of money? name the consultant.

Name what shares and to who was given shares to attack third parties.

Name how any consulant is involved in death spiral financing

Explain how investing in a private placement in spongetech with 73 other investors makes Seth a criminal associate

Taug is not a shell, you might want to check with the SEC on that.

What checkered past by the consultant, and I presume me, was not disclosed?

What are you talking about extortion? How has TAUG tried to extort any person or entity?

These statements are untrue.

[Johnny_C]

TAUG is being run by a person with a rumored substance problem, and arguably that is not the most negative character flaw in his checkered past.

Who has a rumored substance substance abuse problem? Who tells you these false rumors?

Its "consultant," the puppeteer behind the puppet CEO, has spent some time in jail for threatening children (in writing), ignoring a series of court orders, and then threatening a superior court judge.

What consultant spent time in jail for threatening children, prove that. IF you are referring to me I wrote a Family Court judge that she was ignoring child abuse and insulted her. my allegations were supported by DCYF. A First Amendment right, by the way. A nit wit Superior Court judge decided to be a big shot and hold me in criminal contempt for insulting a judge, without notice, right to a lawyer, rights against self incrimination or rights to a jury, it was overturned. That judge ended up recusing himself from the case and then abruptly retiring. I didn't threaten him I sued him. What does this have to do with TAUG? IF Cowan or DECN are basing the defense of lawsuits based on this defense they are going to be very shocked when the actual transcripts are produced.

this consultant intervened in TAUG's lawsuit against its former auditor by communicating with a Federal court judge and bullying her.

How was a federal judge bullied by receiving a letter informing the Court that Cowan and Meyler intentionally failed to reveal in sworn affidavits the relationship they had with the Florida office of Cherry Bakeart, who worked as basically a sub contractor on TAUG's 2014 audit at the behest of Cowan Gutenski. The 2014 audit is the basis of TAUG's lawsuit against Owen Gutenski.

Nor are the CEOs past (and sad) associations, including the association with the arguably criminal association with the rogue SpongeTech.

How does the TAUG's CEO investment, along with 73 other investors, give him a criminal association with Sponge Tech. SPongetech was a high profile high flying company. The only sad association he has had that I know of is with the CEO of DECN, Keith Berman.

TAUG has 4-5 message board vigilantes who are spending 24/7, at the behest (and probably payment) by the TAUG CEO

TAUG does not have any paid posters, prove it.

Now TAUG is resorting to extortion.

Who or what entity is TAUG extorting?

Almost half have been issued so that the CEO could prosecute his hopeless lawsuit, overpay auditors, and attack unassociated third party officers and directors of an unaffiliated company.

What facts do you have to support the lawsuit is hopeless? OR that shares have been issued to attack unassociated third party officers of an unaffiliated company, name the COMPANY and who has been given shares to attack it.

I post once a day on this message board, and the vigilantes

Why, a restriction?

Oh, and by the way, TAUG, its CEO, its "consultant" and the message board vigilantes are being sued by this unaffiliated company for libel and Internet stalking.

Let's get the party started so the truth will come out. Who is suing DECN? the depositions of Lyons, Berman, Jag a donut, and Belcher should make a great read for TAUG shareholders.

TAUG also has bet the ranch on a hopeless lawsuit against a former auditor who admitted to its faults in a public setting.

Last I read the auditor stated he did nothing wrong and was thrown under the bus by the PCAOB even though he clearly violated the rules. so this statement is another falsehood. This auditor violated about 10 rules of the AICPA rules of conduct. Like the judge, he conveniently retired.

Tomorrow I plan to explore the illegal sweetheart deals given to the consultant to invest small amounts of what is now conflicted money, and of course those death spiral financings.

It's tomorrow, let's hear about the illegal sweetheart deals given to the consultant. Provide details of the illegal deal and the name of the consultant this illegal sweetheart deal was given to.


How are you affiliated with DECN?