I understand that any judge might be restrained from expanding into matters outside of the issue at hand. The question is could the judge determine in the normal course of the trial that there are other serious matters, wrong doings or violations; and in learning of these is he not bound by the law to notify the proper authorities/agencies. eg. The DOJ, so they might investigate them?
Biowreck ...In my experience you are correct ..re civil matters .
Judge can definitely comment on other violations but will only rule on the case at hand . Doubt he will forward on any concerns to the DOJ . Its up to Amarin to take action if they so decide. Kiwi
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
