Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,886.24
(
1.02%
)
US TECH 100
24,776.80
(
0.33%
)
Dow Jones
48,218.25
(
0.63%
)
Brent Oil
96.17
(
0.73%
)
Bitcoin
74,376.99
(
-0.16%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 447297
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

jessellivermore

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 236
Posts 10817
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2006

jessellivermore

Re: biowreck post# 46173

Sunday, 03/29/2015 12:26:08 PM

Sunday, March 29, 2015 12:26:08 PM

Post# of 447297
biowreck..

Makes sense to me, not being a lawyer.

I understand that any judge might be restrained from expanding into matters outside of the issue at hand. The question is could the judge determine in the normal course of the trial that there are other serious matters, wrong doings or violations; and in learning of these is he not bound by the law to notify the proper authorities/agencies. eg. The DOJ, so they might investigate them?

":>) JL
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent AMRN News
More AMRN News