Replies to post #4862 on AMD strictly moderated (AMD)

[chipdesigner]

Why should I when we have a quote from someone from
AMD directly on the topic?

Don't want to answer, huh?

Uh no, people who invested in SGI took a calculated risk
with a turn around play with a large potential payoff.

Yeah, I got some penny-stock plays for you, too. Interested in those "calculated risks"?

I suggest you think of SGI as a big "payoff" for all your arrogance over the years.

[Ixse]

Chipguy,

re (Doug wrote): Now that we have you here, why don't you answer the question: Roughly what % of the performance improvement (clock/clock) from the K7 to the K8, on average (or break it down by categories of application) do YOU think is due to the IMC?

Didn't you write on rwt just before K8 arrived that you thought that K8 would have a 10-15% performance improvement due to the integrated MC? I.e. about half of the total improvement you expected? I remember you said something like this (might be off slightly) because you turned out to be quite right.

Regards,

Rink

[I_banker]

Uh no, people who invested in SGI took a calculated risk
with a turn around play with a large potential payoff. Only
a worthless loser troll with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight
would claim otherwise on an investment forum like ihub.

A nice case of revisionist history. "Calculated risk" is a bit different than the characterization here:

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=6143898

I don't generally have a problem with someone changing their position on a stock, but when they attempt to claim they "knew it" all along it gets to be a bit much.