Replies to post #4896 on AMD strictly moderated (AMD)

[chipguy]

A nice case of revisionist history. "Calculated risk" is a bit different than the characterization here:

http://investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=6143898


Did you even read the date on that post?


but when they attempt to claim they "knew it" all along it gets to be a bit much.

What is too much is try to twist a statement about SGI made
more than a year ago into an erroneous characterization of
the recent state of SGI. It speaks volumes about the scummy
motives and intellectual dishonesty of the person doing the
twisting.