Uh no, people who invested in SGI took a calculated risk with a turn around play with a large potential payoff. Only a worthless loser troll with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight would claim otherwise on an investment forum like ihub.
A nice case of revisionist history. "Calculated risk" is a bit different than the characterization here:
I don't generally have a problem with someone changing their position on a stock, but when they attempt to claim they "knew it" all along it gets to be a bit much.