Replies to post #60209 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Amateur140]

Maybe, maybe not. I think his point or question rather was how can this be viewed as anything but positive and therefore if positive the stock should move in a positive direction. The only reason it should move in a negative direction is if someone views it as negative. I'd say at face value at the very least this should be viewed as neutral. If someone is viewing this as negative I think they are holding on to pass performance way to much. For instance either the Kansas City Royals or Baltimore orioles are going to the World Series they have both stunk for the last 30 years a negative fan might have been saying all year "well they've always sucked they can't make it".

[DMN]

That's great news. I was hoping to have more time to increase my LQMT holdings. The last I purchased was at .18, but may hold off for .16 as you suggest.

[Eagle1947]

In addition, I would suggest that all the positive looking statements from LQMT are a preface to the reverse split announcement that will follow the shareholders meeting.
The action might be a necessity but it will hit we long time holders very hard. If I had any sense I would sell a good percentage of my holdings right now, but, I'm in too deep to bail at this point.

Wish I could be more positive to the one to three named hypers, but the facts are the facts. Watts is most likely right on the money with his insights.

[LQMT_Monster]

Looks like Steipp is on track with what he said in the last conference call in August "expecting 4 parts out in 6-12 months." :)