News Focus
News Focus
Followers 43
Posts 5340
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2021

Re: Smitty5150 post# 774462

Monday, 07/07/2025 4:53:15 AM

Monday, July 07, 2025 4:53:15 AM

Post# of 818122
Ooh I believe that you believe that its real, but its not.

The email address is valid, and all technical markers (signed-by, mailed-by, TLS) are authentic.
However, the Sunday morning timestamp raises serious doubts about the authenticity of the interaction, especially if the message contains new or non-generic content. The line “The application is not backlogged and is with the company” sounds strangely convenient, unprompted, and not consistent with MHRA’s usual phrasing. Also, the MHRA would never confirm material application status like that to a retail investor.The MHRA does not disclose the status of ongoing MAAs to third parties (including retail investors or the general public).

If MHRA had responded substantively, it would almost certainly have included boilerplate disclaimers, names, and references — not just a vague status line.
The lack of visible full headers (which would verify DKIM, SPF, and other anti-spoofing checks) means we’re entirely relying on an image that Im convinced is doctored.

The MHRA probably has sent text such as "We cannot comment on ongoing applications. Please refer to the company for further information.” And thas ass altered that text in wording tahts laughable.

So its a fake.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News