Boston's research

[boston745]

I think I understand why Elon Musk was chosen to play the part he does. His grandfather was the founder of a technocratic organization in the 1930s. Whose goal was to reorganize society under a scientific and technological umbrella instead of political and commercial.

The technocracy movement proposed replacing partisan politicians and business people with scientists and engineers who had the technical expertise to manage the economy. But the movement did not fully aspire to scientocracy.[2]

I call them the Technocrats, in recognition of the influence of the technocracy movement, founded in the 1930s by Elon Musk’s grandfather, Joshua Haldeman. 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/08/musk-thiel-zuckerberg-andreessen-alternate-autocratic-reality

Ive said this before, but I felt Musk was a stooge, a puppet for the DoD and Dr. Michael Griffin. That Dr Griffin was the real brains behind the Musk curtain.
Now I can better define what I believe Musk to be. Not just Musk, I believe Thiel is as well and there have been rumors Zuckerberg is connected to CIA. Even Alex Jones is rumored to be CIA but thats a different creature all together. If Jones is CIA or an asset, hes there for controlled opposition purposes not to function like Musk and Thiel.

Regardless which Intelligence agency they may do work for, all would be working as a front for intelligence interests.
So what exactly would Musk/Thiel be as an agent and what might his function be? I believe John Perkins in the pseudo documentary Zeitgeist Addendum describes a similar agent. Before I quote Mr. Perkins, I must say that Zeitgeist Addendum is technocratic propaganda probably designed by intelligence community.

Heres what Perkins described about something called an Economic Hitman:

The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a card-carrying CIA agent and if he'd been caught, the ramifications could have been pretty serious.
So very quickly, at that point the decision was made to use private consultants to channel the money through the World Bank or the IMF or one of the other such agencies, to bring in people like me, who work for private companies.
So that if we got caught, there would be no governmental ramifications.

Like what Perkins describes here, I believe Musk and Thiel were recruited to be private consultants to funnel investment money into companies of national security interest outside the purview and in addition to that of In-Q-Tel. So instead of economic hitmen they work as private investment fronts to fund and/or lead businesses of national security interests without ramifications to the government. Dr Griffin was a major investor into SpaceX through his positions at NASA and a Director at the Pentagon under Trump.

I believe Musks rise from Stanford to SpaceX was orchestrated to give him access to the funds he'd need to kick start SpaceX and eventually fund Tesla. Not only that but to also give Musk the credentials in business he'd eventually need. With Musk being chosen to lead those companies because he comes from the right family and for his technocratic background. However, Musk had no business running either company as his experience was neither in rocket science nor automotive. Instead limited to software coding? Did Musk actually design a software program as an adult? I'm guessing Musk was educated by Intelligence community and higher ranking employees, in the know, to run both companies as he went.

Both SpaceX & Tesla utilize Musks technocratic background to sell technotopian ideals,. Meanwhile, Technocracy is not possible despite how nice it appears. It's a great con used to motivate people to work harder toward a technotopian society while the real agenda is achieved behind the scenes. Like the launching of Brilliant Pebbles aka Starshield for defense interests while using its commercial applications (Starlink) the public front.

The reason to use these private consultant investors is because of the cover they provide for clandestine operations. They setup, run, exert influence over businesses with intelligence and/or national security oriented applications. Thus the public, including most employees, only see the normal business operations. Think about it, Musks technocratic leanings plus the Iron man image that was created by the DoD for him, are used to motivate his employees to work that much harder to get to Mars and create self driving cars. Even if these things may not be possible as indicated by BYD & several scientists about Mars. Teslas continue to kill people because they go out of control and spontaneously combust due to a worsening geomagnetic environment. Settling on Mars is basically impossible if you really examine all the challenges.
Electric vehicles are massive method for collecting data and exerting control as the vehicle can be shutdown remotely. There are also weapons, essentially EM pulses, that disable computers systems rendering EVs dead on impact.
In addition, Tesla's neural network could one day be used by the MIC for ballistic missile targeting and tracking with Starshield, equipped with the proper laser equipment, able to take those missiles out. Thus Tesla would become a component of Brilliant Eyes and SpaceX Brilliant Pebbles, both defense initiatives from the 1980s.

The CIA has setup private company fronts many times I'm sure, but it was nice enough to give us an example in its forming and using Air America as cover for its operations.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230315025546/https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/ten-fascinating-cia-missions/

Why doesn't Elon just fly one these to Mars? Or can you not create a Vortex in Space? Notice these were invented and flying prior to 1946 before they were first seen by public.
[Suppressed Image]
i.imgur.com/LTAB0rc.jpg
If image doesnt load click link.