Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

brooklyn13, You hear the voices of the few that feed your Israeli victimhood. You cherry pick and accuse us of doing what you do. You cling to your irrelevant whataboutisms:

"So, you’re not hearing Biden being called “genocide Joe”, because of US aid to Israel? That’s happening at places far removed from campuses, yet derive from the same precepts. The new twist on war casualties of calling them part of a genocide happens on this board, too.
P - Did America commit a genocide in Vietnam or Iraq? I still haven’t heard Russia’s war with Ukraine called a genocide. Was Britain accused of genocide in WWII? Assad? China? Crickets. See what I’m getting at?"

And, you still have not stated publicly what you would say face-to-face to Barak. Or what you would have said to Peres. As far as my too many replies to you about the mess you support, that's the bottom line for me. You reach, you grasp. You clone to every tiny bitch

brooklyn13, Putting the genocide debate aside, your support of indiscriminate killing
of many thousands in retaliation for the murder of some 130 is again noted.
P - As to population density, it is accurate to say Gaza is "incredible densely populated"
despite your misleading claim you don't understand why it is claimed to be so:
[...] Both Barak and the late Peres condemned Zionist policy yet you will not.
That clearly places you on the extreme right on the Israel question.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174341474

you can put your bloodied hands upon in posts we put up.

Your refusal to say what you would say to those two says it all about you.

And since it remains a waste of time spending much if any more energy in engaging with you, see again

brooklyn13, Only a narrowly opinionated Israel supporter would label the late Shimon Peres and Ehud Barak as media sources. I assume many alternate sites would have similar quotes, used to support position. It is not a case of confirming biases, but a case of supporting arguments. What is your position on that? You remain comafied (don't know if that is an accepted word) when it comes to having an opinion on the quotes of Peres and Barak given you, yet you accuse me of being no good at considering different points of view.

"You’re an expert at finding media sources that confirm your biases. You are absolutely no good at considering that different points of view have any merit.
P - During the course of these discussions, I have conceded that Netanyahu belongs in jail as do the WB settlers. You’ve yet to concede there’s any validity in anyone else’s opinion.
P - Whatever. It’s not worth the effort."

You have not validly argued against either of their comments. In fact you do nothing more than ignore them. Every one of your opinions have been dealt with here yet you accuse myself and others of ignoring your view, while you stolidly ignore all of ours. All while you ignore the different points of view of Peres and Barak. In other words you unarguably project. As a tangent see .. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174307924 . And there is nothing in this as suggesting you are a Trump supporter. The thought i just had was strictly on the fact that you also have projected here.

When did Peres make his critical comments i wonder (not sure if i missed it earlier), so searched "what year did Shimon Peres become critical of Israel anti-Palestinian state policy" . Note: there is nothing at all "expert at finding media sources that confirm your biases" in posing a question as that. You apparently have nothing left but to attack the messenger, and that's perfectly understandable since you had no moral or ethical or humane base for your superficial positions from the start. Anyway the obviously inexpert search came up with this one, and i don't know yet if this one result of the FireFox search has gives me an answer to the question asked, to this point i've read only the first few paragraphs of:

Israel’s last founding father .. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174313830 .

See also again:

brooklyn13, Hamas has said more than once something at least close to that they would not release all their hostages until there was a permanent ceasefire. Their alleged 130 hostages still remain leverage for them. Why would anyone make that demand except to get a rise out of people like you. Or for personal political reasons. And how many Palestinians are in Israel jails, many for as petty a crime as throwing rocks. Over 9000.

Again - still - to your whinge that you have never seen (sod knows why you would expect it or even worse why you would say it when you have said you don't visit here often), we have never seen any answer from you to a simple question:

brooklyn13, Figured that. And that's one overriding good reason for you not to have attacked the board and individual posters as you consistently have.
[...]Lastly, personally i perceive you as being over protective of Israel for the same reasons as millions of others would undoubtedly see you the same way. For the same reasons i'm sure Ehud Barak would see you as being that. Have you ever asked yourself why you could (or would) never say candidly here what you would say face-to-face to that Israeli who said if he were Palestinian he would have joined a terrorist group. Must've asked you that question some 3-4 times. Yet only silence.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174276709
[...]
That is, Peres thinks that the Likud Party and its partners are living in a fool’s paradise if they believe they can annex the whole of Palestinian territory without getting the Palestinians as Israeli citizens eventually. And then, Peres says, no more Israel as a Jewish state.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174298978
[...]
Reminder: Related: Ehud Barak: the military mastermind Israel loves to hate
[...]Israel's yearning for experienced military leaders brought him back to political life after the 2006 Lebanon war and he became minister of defence. He seems to have a feel for what motivates his enemies and was widely quoted as saying: "If I were a Palestinian I would have joined a terrorist organisation." Barak also stated during a US television interview last year that he would "probably" strive for nuclear weapons if he were in Iran's position.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173530549
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174249868
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174264881
April, 2024 - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174308544