InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 4355
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/06/2017

Re: long uoip post# 94100

Friday, 04/15/2022 11:14:35 AM

Friday, April 15, 2022 11:14:35 AM

Post# of 96904
How does this infer that Deidre is in the driver's seat? Deidre filed a TRO in 2020 because she had no control over the decisions made by Billy Carter and Chanbond's legal representation that negotiated the sale/settlement in 2021. How can one draw a conclusion that Deidre is in control due to CBV signing away the patents to IPNav when she had to file a TRO just to protect her own interests in this lawsuit? She rescinded her 22% share as advised by Chanbond's legal representation and then had to fight to get it back. Now the premise on this board is that Deidre is in control?

There is purchase agreement in place where UOIP acquired Chanbond and Chanbond is the listed entity on all legal documents referring to these patents throughout the lawsuit/PTAB process.

Not sure whether these inferences are made up by design by some on this board or if there is just confusion. This has been closely followed by many on this board for years now and I'm not sure how there could be confusion surrounding this circumstance.

What Earl is arguing is that they were manipulated by Deidre in order for her to gain control of the patents through IPNav - thereafter IPNav consolidated the patents under Chanbond which then was acquired by UOIP. Which explains why Deidre was not involved in the negotiations and ended up filing a TRO to protect her own interests.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.