NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[sentiment_stocks]

Exactly, which they would never do because they know what they are doing to these biotech stocks is not what they would want for their wives and daughters.

If they really believe that exposure to legalized predation makes us all better and stronger, they should send their daughters and wives to ISIS.

They know exactly what they are doing, but they think if they dress it up under the guise of nobility, we won't see that the emperor is obviously "naked" underneath it.

I suggest that these hedge funds manipulate not only the market, but perhaps the journalists as well. The hedge funds promote this "robin hood' version of themselves to the journalists, who then gulp down the kool aid the hedge funds serve them. Just take a look again at the Kingsford Capital quilt given to Adam in 2012 as a holiday gift (tweet photo shown below). Smack dab in the middle it reads,
"Be Not Deceived". When the one being deceived is him. The hedge funds are simply wrapping the message up in whatever will appeal to the journalist.

Remember in the you tube video Cramer explained,

"You have to use these guys," said Cramer. He also discussed giving information to "the bozo reporter from The Wall Street Journal" to get an article published.[28][29] Cramer said this practice, although illegal, is easy to do "because the SEC doesn't understand it."[30] During the interview Cramer referred to himself as a "banking-class hero."

Adam is the bozo reporter from The Street. If you cater to his fantasy that he's helping the little guy (oh, and take him to a baseball game or two), then he can feel good about the load he's dumping on us.

In the article from 2012 that Evaluate posted, the money manager "hiding" in the article states,

“What troubles me, however, is the growing propensity for less confident long-only investors to attack the messenger — short sellers like me — instead of rigorously debating the short thesis.

There has been no rigorous debate of the short thesis taking place here. The authors cite the same straw man arguments, then either don’t respond to the “rigorous debate” that we post in the comments section, or they remove the comments all together. And they keep saying the same thing, no matter what we say. And this argument is basically stating that anyone that attacks the short is just “less confident”, and that must be why we’re “attacking the messenger.”

Which we all know is complete baloney.