Congrats to everyone that held on throughout this process. I remember talking with you about a year ago when I was loading this sub penny. We took a lot of grief from the naysayers. Looks as though our patience is about to be handsomely rewarded.

it's the otc. a lot of emotion based trading (fomo), bid dumping (fear), which usually brings very erratic price action. will this see 05 again? no one truly knows. i can tell you the volume profile points to quite a bit of accumulation between 01-03. very little inventory above 03 to 05, where the next sizeable resistance happens between 05-08. if it manages to break through that 08 area, it'll explode. those are the technicals. but with sharp tickers anything can happen.

Where is I-Glow....

This aged well. Hopefully some of you were able to load this puppy up sub penny. Great things coming here.

$dbmm wicked up to .0046, then the ask stackers showed up. trend still intact and above the .0042 pivot. as long as bid support remains around the .0039 area we'll tap that 200 ma at .0051 soon. former resistance now support at .0039. if that gives we'll likely revisit .0035 to .0031.

$DBMM .. significant level at .0042 coming up. Break through that pivot, next stop is 200 ma at .0051. above that things will get spicy. supports at .0029 and .0025 respectively
still not very many shares on the ask. couldn't ask for a more bullish chart imo

Here you go. Your motives are obvious, and I have gleaned what information I was after. Thanks again!

I appreciate your insights. Most, if not all, of these otcs are definitely not "investments.". A lot of these names in the otc have been beaten down pretty well over the last year. it's all about knowing your runners. I trade on technicals. What brought dbmm onto my radar is it appears to be the beginning of an MMBM. The 20 ema is beginning to curl and price just peeked over the 50 ema. You'll also notice recent pa indicates a reversal out of the downtrend.This one has a history of pretty decent runs and r/r at these levels is worth it for me. Best of luck.

..too funny. Obviously your commentary was designed to be insulting, not to "educate."
So allow me to educate YOU. FOKs and IOCs can be used strategically to gauge a stocks liquidity. I've used it in the past on otc stocks to establish starter positions. Are sellers bid dumping? Will I need to slap the ask? It's just another way to gather information. As for "MMs laughing..", it's algorithmic trading with buy and sell models. I wasn't aware algos had a sense of humor.
Have a nice day.

Just because I didn't want a partial fill on my order, that makes me a newb? get the fuck out....
I definitely smell blood here though, and your engagements here tonight just clarified some things.
Thanks!

1m bid fill or kill@ 24. There were roughly 34k shares at 26, and a little over 1m on the ask at 30. The spread between the bid and ask also tells me there just weren't many shares being offered up, which also explains the low liquidity on this ticker. Those with shares, for the most part, are holding them. I'll try again Monday.

I squatted on the bid all day. Never came close to getting filled. Again, if this is such a pos and is as easy as you say it is to buy shares, I should have been filled fairly quickly.

Have you ever even shorted a stock? I have, and when ToS shows this I stay away.



I've never had a dog in this "naked short" discussion one way or the other. But to definitively say there is "no short position" without offering anything except "trust me bro" to support that claim is disingenuous. There is ALWAYS a short position, in every security traded. Some minimal, some quite significant. And, until today, I could have cared less about it one way or the other. But it's become obvious something is awry here.

I have a small position here. Was looking to add to it and there is actually very little being offered on the ask. What also caught my attention is ToS shows "NTB" (none to borrow). I don't recall EVER seeing that for any otc stock. So to claim there is no short position here isn't exactly accurate.

Not a problem, glad to share. And, I 100% agree with you. Your post is spot on, particularly with regard to the recent approval of the Bitcoin ETFs and the slow but steady progress that crypto and blockchain related currencies and industries are gaining mainstream acceptance. I think, as a custodian, and with the upfront money he has spent, most of us will be pleasantly surprised with the outcome. I've flipped this several times, but I've held onto a core of my position for awhile now and have been adding to it for the past several months now. I wish you and all investors here the best of luck. It will indeed be very interesting!

wnft would be the perfect fit for Propy. Until Sharp confirms anything it's merely speculation, but intriguing nonetheless. The $pro token currently sits around 0.49 / token. Acquiring wnft would allow a greater influx of traditional stock market investors, without the hassles of going through the SPAC process. With the strong backing of Silicon Valley leaders and the National Association of Realtors, it's pretty obvious to me that a decentralized and far more secure platform would streamline the international real estate infrastructure. You can read more here if interested.
https://capital.com/propy-pro-price-prediction

Lest you forget, Calasse was offered 10 million commons, which at the time could be sold for .50/share, to simply "go away." The greedy prick refused. $5 million dollars is a far cry from stealing shares, but I digress.
Per the WNFT twitter feed:
It is $WNFT's position that Calasse does not have jurisdiction, but that even if the court rules that it will consider his appeal, it will not be granted because
1) Calasse did not pay the company for his stock nor did he provide value;
2) Calasse's previous counsel did not provide supporting evidence that Calasse was entitled to anything, within the period allowed;
3) Calasse participated in a fraud committed by the then company's controlling shareholders; and,
4) You cannot unring a bell, i.e. the shares have already been cancelled and you cannot uncancel shares.
It is $WNFT's position that it will not reward Calasse for his fraudulent stewardship of the company during his short reign as a puppet President.
So I guess Sharp's lawyers are lying now too. The only fraud and scams seemingly perpetrated by anyone are the ones from prior management. The same people you are so eagerly and vehemently defending.

Yes it is.

We're talking about $wnft. But since you mentioned it, $gvsi was a mess until Sharp and his team cleaned it up.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/apdocuments/3-19407-2023-05-17-app-not-withdr-applic.pdf
Prior management with $gvsi were scammers and frauds. Similar circumstances exist here with $wnft.

That's a given. Form 10, 15c, Super 8-K...all just paper shuffling that Sharp and his team will manage when the time is right. Pretty simple stuff to achieve considering $wnft is SEC reporting and fully audited.

Sigh....
Form 10 registration statement is automatically effective 60 days after filing, regardless of whether the issuer has responded to all Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) comments. Registration statements on Form S-1 register specific securities of a company. Form S-1 can be used to register shares for a company to sell to investors, specific sh ares for the issuer’s shareholders to resell. Form S-1 can also be used to register both simultaneously.
The S-1 registers and offers specific shares for the issuer or its stockholders to sell to the public. Form S-1 can be used for an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) or Direct Public Offering (“DPO”). Sharp obviously filed the Form 10 for the expediency at the time. If he chooses to file an S-1, typically the SEC renders comments to registration statements on Form S-1 within 30 days after filing. Upon satisfaction of all comments, the SEC will declare the registration statement effective.
Nice try though.

Of course he doesn't. I never said he did. What I implied was that the reason for the 15c delay could perhaps be related to the ongoing court delays. What you inferred was that I said it was Calasse's fault. Point is, noone knows why Sharp has chosen to wait. But, as is your usual modus operandi, you'll spin it into a negative reflection upon Sharp.

Noone knows where the share price will end up. But those of us who were trading this stock prior to the Calasse fiasco have seen how thin she trades. Sharp has spent alot of money cleaning this shell up and getting it ready for a merger. He is still spending money on legal and maintenance fees. I seriously doubt he'd go through all of this time and trouble for a .05 cent per share return. Time will certainly tell though.

I wholeheartedly agree Don. I remember the build up when this was Goff and the run from about a dime when it came off expert market to it's high around. 75 before the forward split. As for "pumping", this stock doesn't need it. I, for one, think it's a sound investment. With this share structure, and Sharp's other mergers playing out, I see the share price going well above where it is now. Best of luck to you.

I agree. I still think it's a great opportunity to buy shares at these prices. I have been and will continue doing so.

What's funny is to think that a SEC filer with audited financials would have any problem getting a 15c through. I was merely speculating on what might have delayed this. Only Sharp knows. Anything else...including your assumption about Calasse...is also speculation. All in due time.

$wnft is an SEC filer with audited financials. The 15c will get filed once the Calasse issue is resolved. At this price the r/r is well worth it for me.

I've been quietly loading at these levels for some time. Share structure remains unchanged.
https://twitter.com/pogwoll/status/1740585533783605420

same to you. i'm still holding my full position. I had no intention of selling today anyway. watching time and sales today it became obvious to me early on that sellers outweighed buyers. there were some strange sells today as well, with several small lots sold below the bid. anyway, until more brokers allow buying or there is another catalyst we'll likely trade in a range these next few days. not worried at all.

and..that's really all that happened today. more sellers than buyers.
then you couple that with those sellers dumping into the bid instead of spreading out sell orders on the ask and you end up with what we saw today.
I'm still long. still bullish.

Pretty remarkable $gvsi is garnering this much attention, especially for a stock that's been sitting on the expert market for a year and a half.

I missed this one. The possibilities of blockchain are truly endless.

Indeed it is.

Thanks. Will do!

Thanks PB. I'm thinking the same thing. As of late it appears he has his foot on the gas with no signs of letting up.

I actually addressed this very topic in a thread on twitter earlier this month. I linked an article from Forbes that details how several large companies have integrated blockchain technologies to enhance and streamline their daily operations. The possibilities are truly endless. Anyway, link below if you're interested.

$gvsi A Thread. 🧵
Blockchain technology and it's applications are utilized well beyond the crypto industry. In fact, there are many large companies using blockchain technology in a variety of ways which may come as a surprise to many who think blockchain's primary utilization pic.twitter.com/cwLglJIWMY

— Pogwoll (@pogwoll) January 2, 2023

Well said. Terrific post.

Great post Hokie.

Same for me. I'm looking forward to watching lvl 2/ time and sales again. The first few days gvsi is fully tradeable should be very telling.

Thanks Hokie.

Thank you. I'm excited about the next few weeks and with the progress we've seen from Sharp and his team as of late, it appears things may develop at a fairly quick pace moving forward.

And around and around we go. Dodge and weave. Doesn't change the fact I have provided an ample amount of examples explaining the difference between the two concepts and why it's relevant to gvsi. Your deflection of glaring evidence to the contrary of your argument points to one thing imo. But I digress.

You failed to provide context to this point. These frauds you mentioned were colluding with one another. Dms sent back and forth along with communication on private discords as they front loaded plays and duped their followers into thinking they were buying when they were actually selling. Comparing this to investors in Gvsi who are now about to see a return on their investment ( a lot of us are coming up on 2 years we've been invested here) when there was significant risk at many stages throughout this process that we would lose everything we had invested is a far cry from "frontloading" a stock. The fact you would even offer this comparison, quite frankly, is laughable.

Not accurate. Sharp has repeatedly said he's not interested in appeasing any quick buck artists and if one is not comfortable with these extended timelines to avoid investing in his companies. Kind of flies in the face of the whole "pump and dump" argument you put forward.
The only part of your comment I do agree with is investors should listen to what George Sharp and his team announce with regards to specific details pertaining to gvsi such as share cancelations, merger candidates and so forth.

Thank you. Things are about to get spicy.

Oh, I'm fully aware of the difference between short sale volume and short interest.
Short interest is the total number of shares of a particular stock that have been sold short by investors but have not yet been covered or closed out. This can be expressed as a number or as a percentage.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/01/082201.asp
Anyone that thinks these nanocap and microcap stocks haven't been shorted to some degree at some point (often times these short sales happen before these stocks get below a $1 and to sub penny levels) just lacks a basic understanding of how the markets work. In most of these instances the short sellers never took profit (closed the position). Often times they don't have to. I know several bears that have been shorting a particular stock since it was above $50/share ( currently at $12) and plan on riding it down to $0, never having to cover their position. It happens. A lot.
GVSI has a short interest above 60%. Anything above 20% is considered high.
I'm also pretty sure that Daniel Ivandjiiski and the guys at Zerohedge know the difference between short sale volume and short interest. That's probably why they included our beloved gvsi in their article to begin with.
(Daniel Ivandjiiski is a Bulgarian-born, U.S.-based former investment banker and capital-markets trader, and currently financial blogger, who founded the website Zero Hedge in January 2009, and remains its publisher and main editor.)
Even if this stock hasn't been heavily shorted (meaning the experts are wrong), it's still going to do very well. The short interest is just the cherry on top of the sundae.