MDBS I just bought 100,000 units. Thanks for the alert!!!

Are we expecting any news from NAWL?

We need 2 to 3 PR every week to get this stock to the promise land!

PennyStockChaser is doing a promo on the stock! Nice!!

TYTN is on fire. Please visit www.tytanholdings.com before you invest. You will thank me after you invest in TYTN

Check TYTN! Please don't just check the symbol! Check out the company itself at www.tytanholdings.com
I can assure you that you will never find any good company trading at such a low price.

GAGI is moving up on pending merger news. Check pinksheet.com news segment for details.

TYTN is the best penny stock out there! Do a little DD and you totally fall in love with the stock. Visit the website at www.tytanholdings.com

TYTN is the best penny stock out there! Do a little DD and you totally fall in lone with the stock. Visit the website at www.tytanholdings.com

Financials of this kind (multiple years) usually take up to 4 months to complete! Don't count on any financials to be released before May. Since Tytan's tractors are produced in far away China, the Auditors would have to go there for physical verifications of assets/ inventory and also review some paperwork with the manufacturers . They would need to confirm all the payables that Tytan needs to make to them. They would need to check with both vendors and customers of Tytan for verification of account balances. This is why they call it "Audited Financials". Trust me, the auditors are not usually in a hurry to complete an audit of this nature. They are also very keen and meticulous!

I got 200k on the dip!!!

We will close 'green' as long as we slap the 'ask'

I agree with you! Such a nice company with lots of potentials but, not enough publicity!

Which stock is thin to dollarland? AJVE or other stock? How do they plan to finance the acquisition? Their last 10Q filing shows $0 revenue for years 2008 and 2009! See the link below

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6897283

So, how do they plan to acquire a 51% stake in a company (GZGT) that boasts over $20m in annual revenue?

The other thing that baffles me about AJVE is that the company made $0.00 revenue in both 2008 and 2009 according to their 10Q filing in the link below:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6897283

How do they plan to acquire 51% stake in a company as big as GZGT that boasts over $20 million in annual revenue? Do they think that money falls from the trees? Which bank do they think would loan them any money for acquisition without AJVE proving that they are a company with solid revenue? It beats me! I don't know if it beats anyone else!!

It was not a terrible news either! If according to you, the debt reduction failed (no proof yet), then I think the 51% ownership buy by AJVE was a positive move.

Nice PR! 3 pending patents!!! We should see some upward movement in the stock price and volume today.

He is not going to post the screen shot because he is nothing but a lousy LIAR. So, don't count on him to post any evidence of his so called $110,000 investment in BEDA.

Yep, 'patience' is the key word. There would be some bumps here and there, but with patience, all will be well. It might even look discouraging sometimes, but if you have done your DD on Tytan and Mark Leonard, you would know that TYTN is in a league of its own. Patience people! Patience!!

Actual revenue, more positive news and great PR will drive your stock price to the moon and beyond in pinksheet. 'Simple math' theory is just an obnoxious way of distorting reality!

You were wrong again? How could you be comparing QASP with the CEO' s 'Projection' of $150m in 2010 to TYTN of 'Proven' $5m in revenue? See the difference? One is projected revenue (QASP) and the other one is 'proven' revenue (TYTN). In my message #949, I implored you not to consider companies with 'projected' revenues in your research. Yet you could only come up with QASP with $150m projected revenue!!! Could you tell this board how much QASP reported as revenue in their last quarter filings because I did not see any revenue amount.
Take it or leave it, the theory of dividing a company's revenue with the O/S is a redundant way of determining a stock price in any market (especially in a pink sheet). There are bunch of shell companies with no revenues that have trades above 2 cents in recent times. Your 'simple math' theory is just a classroom/ textbook theory that has no bearing whatsoever with reality.

Unfortunately, that 'simple math' only works in the mind of investors! It is far far far from reality. The reality is that many stocks either in pinksheet or bigger markets do not conform with the 'simple math' theory! If you disagree with me, then could you kindly explain why most stocks fell significantly yesterday and today? Did they suddenly increased their O/S and reduced their revenue yesterday? Could you do the 'simple math' and see if these securities are at par with your theory? YHOO, SGY, ACAS, GOOG, MSTF, KATX, RTTW? The truth of the matter is that positive news and future expectations move and determine stock prices. There are bunch of companies with similar A/S, O/S, Float, and revenue, yet their share prices would be miles apart.
The basic fact is that with TYTN stats and future expectations, (compare to it's pinksheet peers), this stock should be trading above 2 cents!
Please, don't get me wrong, I know you are not bashing TYTN. I do understand that you want the share price to increase. I just do not want you to think that the "simple math" is a good determinant of stock prices because REALISTICALLY speaking, it never works. So, please let deal with reality here: A pinksheet with 800m O/S and $5m in revenue should trade well above 1 cent. That is the way it works in pinksheet!

Are you kidding me? 800m outstanding is too much for a company with $5 million revenue? Please tell me you have never traded in any pinksheet stock before TYTN. So what do you think the revenues for those pinksheet companies that trade in pennies are? In case you don't know, most of them have annual revenues below $1m and they have billions in A/S, billion in O/S and close to billion in float. Please randomly research any pink sheet companies that trade above 0.01 and compare their A/S, O/S, Float, and revenue (I really mean revenue and not some CEOs' future revenue projections and see how they measure up with TYTN. Please do that!

Masked Superstar, since you are one of the moderators, it would be nice if you could please post today's news and the December 3rd acquisition news on this board. Thanks.

We shouln't forget that this hits 17 cents in July '08!!!

As long as PSC does not dump all of the 100 milion shares at once ( which I don't think they would do), then we are fine. As long as we continue to trade in the range of 200m to 300m shares everyday, a dump of 10 million daily by PSC should not have significant impact on the share price.

Does anyone know the yearly revenue for this company?

If you have done your DD; you will know that this is where to be. The company is solid!!!

I guess they needed the money so badly. I can't phantom the fact that people would sell this stock at this level!!

Thank you!
Please, keep the board inform when/ if she returns your call.

Please let us know when you get a response from the company!

Maybe you have forgotten; 0.0017 was the initial bottom/ support that could never be broken, then it was 0.0013, then 0.0009, then 0.0008.
These people are just too full of themselves! Me2 even said that I shouldn't refer to Nick Toms as a "pinksheet" CEO. It is so rediculous how these people fail to support the obvious. They proclaimed Nick as the best thing that could ever happen to a company! Nick Toms this... Nick Toms that...

Nope, it was never PR'd that an audited financials would be released. The rumor came about when our "ever reliable" Me2 supposedly had a phone coversation with the CEO on November 27.

Me2, please don't give us the BS about Tom smiling at the other end of the line. We Are not interested in the CEO's mood right now. Tell us exactly what he told you! Nothing more, nothing less!!! Don't try to spin anything around by telling us what his mood was when you talked to him.

The truth has set you free!!! He is indeed a pinksheet CEO with Nasdaq background!!!

The guy is dillusioned! If he thinks Toms Nic is not a pinksheet CEO, maybe Warren Buffet is.
I just don't understand why it is so difficult for people to speak the truth. Is this guy trying to portray Tom as a Nasdaq CEO?
Dude, in case you are not aware; CYSG is a pinksheet company and TOMS NIC IS THE CEO OF CYSG

There is nothing wrong in bashing a stock you thought was going to be great but turned out not to be what your DD showed.

Of course, we missed and overlooked many things about CYSG! First of all, we violated the first rule in pinksheet land. Thou shall not fall in love with any pinksheet stock. Unfortunately we all fell in love with CYSG even when the price continues to fall, we still give excuses after excuses in order to justify the price fallen. Secondly, we violated the second rule in pinksheet land which is thou shall not fall in love with a pinksheet CEO. Boy, did we have bunch of people that thought Nic Toms was the greatest thing that could happen to any company. Hell yeah!

Hey, Nick Toms got everything under control. Ask the moderators about Tom's resume, they will post you gazzilion of his resume. Yo, Tom is the man!!!

So you were also loosing money on CYSG? Why in the world were you thinking on Dec. 15th by mocking that I lost $5K on CYSG?? I thought your account was swelling!!! Oh! My bad!!! So you don't know that people that live in a glass house shooldn't be trowing stones?