Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I hate to say it but releasing this same advertisement over and over again reeks of desperation.
A recent photo posted on Facebook with two or more tanks that are stocked with shrimp would have been 1000 times better...and even that wouldn't sustain the pps for very long.
I wasn't able to find a pic or video on the FB page that is more recent than 4 months. There is a video on the FB page from 2015 where the water is pretty green. Could that be what you are looking at?
Grow tanks in 2015
OK...if you say so.
All I need to know is this is more smoke and mirrors and a whole bunch of nothing. NaturalShrimp Corporation (NSC) is already registered as a foreign entity in Texas, and it has been since 2005. NaturalShrimp Incorporated (NSI) owns one hundred percent of NSC, which was formed to operate a shrimp farm in the U.S. & Canada. It's obvious NSC is the entity that is actually conducting business operations in Texas.
Every corporation doing business in Texas must register with the state. Period. Every corporation.
Texas Attorney General Opinion JM-7 (PDF) holds that the act of being a general partner of a Texas partnership constitutes transacting business in Texas.
You just told me everything I needed to know.
This was not an IR question. It was an attempt to clarify what you had previously posted.
I'm not getting it...
In terms of operations, how is the relationship between NaturalShrimp Inc. and Natural Shrimp Corporation different than than the relationship between Alphabet Inc. and Google? When I search for Alphabet Inc stock value it is linked to Google.
As the parent company SHMP's operations are independent of NSC's operations. Why does SHMP have to be registered in Texas too, when NSC is already registered to do operations there?
NaturalShrimp Corporation is a subsidiary of NaturalShimp Inc. NSC is registered in Texas. What is wrong with that?
Do you consider Uber to be a sucessful business?
If this is true...
NaturalShrimp Corporation is a subsidiary of NaturalShrimp, Inc.
A subsidiary company is a company owned and controlled by another company. The owning company is called a parent company or sometimes a holding company.
A subsidiary's parent company may be the sole owner or one of several owners. If a parent company or holding company owns 100% of another company, that company is called a "wholly owned subsidiary."
There is a difference between a parent company and a holding company in terms of operations. A holding company has no operations of its own; it owns a controlling share of stock and holds assets of other companies (the subsidiary companies).
A parent company is simply a company that runs a business and that owns another business — the subsidiary. The parent company has operations of its own, and the subsidiary may carry on a related business. For example, the subsidiary might own and manage property assets of the parent company, to keep the liability from those assets separate.
The website says the company has been in business for 14 years going back to 2005.
The date 2005 may be incorrect but if you add 14 years it comes out to 2019.
I'm not investing based on what this website says.
Don't shoot the messenger...I copied and pasted that from corporationwiki.com
Naturalshrimp Corporation Overview
Naturalshrimp Corporation filed as a Foreign For-Profit Corporation in the State of Texas on Tuesday, September 6, 2005 and is approximately fourteen years old, according to public records filed with Texas Secretary of State. A corporate filing is called a foreign filing when an existing corporate entity files in a state other than the state they originally filed in. This does not necessarily mean that they are from outside the United States.
Ok...if they file as a corporation with Texas SOS under the name Natural Shrimp Inc...does that allow them to do business in Texas?
They are registered in Texas as a foreign for-profit corporation under the name NaturalShrimp Corporation.
They may need to file a name change to NaturalShrimp Inc with the Texas SOS office to clean that up?? Maybe someone who is in contact with the company can clear that up.
When they say "manufacturers" that likely pertains only to their cardboard casket...What they should say is importer - and by the way, we make this one cardboard casket.
Kelly and his partner’s impact on the company’s success was so great that by the time they sold it in 2002, the annual sales totaled $60 million.
They manufacture metal and wood caskets that are twice inspected and monitored by strict Waterloo International guidelines.
Do you have a link to back this up?
There were a couple of paid promos last year...but the list you posted here doesn't add up.
Ok...thanks
They should have said 6 out of last 7 quarters...or maybe 7 out of last 8 quarters.
Was that a big uptick...2009 4th quarter net loss?
This is the most important trend IMO...just not hapenning fast enough!
Preliminary numbers also indicate that it was our seventh straight quarter with a decrease in total Net Loss
Wasn't there also a step in the filing that says Matthews will buy the products back? How do you know that both steps are not transacted at the same time?
ETNL has no money.How are they going to get by step one?
sorry, you're going to have to eat those comments
Looks like they simply airbrushed or transferred an image on the lid of a black casket. Have we gone from custom designed products to assembly line coffins with a big decal?
They are supposedly for use as an ice chest so I guess it wouldn't make sense to put much money into the design. Probably all EI could afford to roll out right now. I could have set this deal up.
Looks like he has been their SEC attorney for a couple of years.
link
Note the front page of the filing
You're kidding right...Are you suggesting the use of the word "support" implies there is NO direct line of authority between the VOF and the Vatican?
"The Vatican Observatory is a scientific research institute of the Holy See subject to the Governorate of Vatican City State." LINK
The Arizona facility is a "division" of the Vatican Observatory. The Vatican Observatory headquarters is located at the Pope's summer residence in Italy. The Vatican pays for the whole operation. Why is it so hard for you to connect the dots?
The President of the VOF is APPOINTED BY the Pope!! The VOF is nothing more than a tax exempt organization created to raise funds to support the Arizona facility. I highly doubt a tax exempt fundraising body has the authority to approve this.
I agree the Pope is not going to get involved in day-to-day operations of the VOF...but someone in Rome who is a bureaucrat in the Vatican organization very well could be involved. I would say it's better than a 50-50 chance you are dead wrong about who is involved in approving the casket designs.
If you are so concerned about this why not give the Director of the Vatican Observatory a call...in Rome...his number is (+39)-06-698-85266
Or maybe call their Coordinator for Public Relations...also in Rome...his number is (+39)-06-698-63364
Oh my God they both have the same address in Arizona. That must mean the whole Vatican thing is some kind of scam...What are we going to do now...LMAO
Info about VOF and Gruppo Santony...
Big deal...The President of the VOF has a phone number in Arizona and a phone number in Rome...they spend time in both places...so what is your point?
Rev. George V. Coyne, SJ
President, Vatican Observatory Foundation
Director Emeritus, Vatican Observatory
Tel: (520) 795-1918 in Tucson or
+39-06-698 85266 in Rome
Coyne was appointed Director of the Vatican Observatory by Pope John Paul I in 1978. Sounds like he answers to the Pope to me and as President of the VOF he probably has something to say about the design. How do you know that Coyne isn't in Rome right now talking to Benedict XVI?
Pope appoints Vatican Observatory Director
Again, I dont't know what you are seeing that leads to an upward trend in purchasing personalized funeral products.
It could be another 10 to 20 years before this concept really grows legs and runs
And let us not forget, EI hasn't been able to find customers in 5 years. There is suddenly going to be a new intrerest in personalized funeral products? I don't think so.
Still spinning this one huh?
Look up the SEC rule that was listed as the reason ETNL was taken off OTCBB. The rule applies to MM's. My interpretation is that EI's MM did not file the papers with OTCBB...probably by choice. EI must have provided the current SEC documents to their MM or they would have been taken of OTCQB also and dropped to the "Pink Sheet" where companies that are not SEC reporting are listed.
You keep trying to suggest they are listed on the "pink sheet" because of the .PK extension. You should really do some research on this. The truth has been pointed out 100's of times...and you don't seem to understand it...or??? If posters on message boards aren't fair and balanced then they really have no credibility IMO. It just becomes a game with two sides shouting BS at one another like a bunch of children.
Remember they are no longer ENTL.OB, they are ENTL.PK, so they no longer have to file form 4's.
I thought the ST urn was composite block...I wasn't much impressed with the picture I saw. I liked the old design EI released a couple of years ago far better. You say you saw one made from metal at the show?
EI had the ST urn there, actually two of them displaying INSIDE the MATW display. It was a nice looking bronze urn
At what level of the product movement process is the "wholesale price" that you're talking about?
I know what "manufacturing cost" is....I could write a book on it.
The agreement with Matthews is multi-million dollar in nature. I believe that Matthews would do a background check of some sort before they went down this path with EI. EI is SEC reporting so it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the only way this deal can work is if Matthews simply pays EI for the difference between the manufacturing cost and the wholesale price. If a bunch of bulletin board posters can figure it out then I think Matthews could too.
That means EI will probably only be able to report the difference as income. So if EI earns $200 per casket and Matthews produces 2,000 of them EI would only be able to report about $400k in sales vs. a couple of million in sales if it were to be set up the way the naysayers are trying to portray it.
EI needs to earn enough profit on this arrangement to pay the VOF license fee. Unfortunately the VOF doesn't care if Matthews makes 2,000 caskets or 20 caskets. Of course there are also urns and memorial candles and other gift items to help with that.
Still just an opinion...albeit maybe a popular opinion...but an opinion none the less.
Unless there is some court ruling or something???
Have read the failure to comply rule? It has to do with the MM's responsibilities to the quotation service.
EI obviously has complied with their SEC filings or their MM would not be able to quote them on OTCQB. Don't you think?
I'll make you a deal. If six months from now ETNL is trading with the symbol ETNL.QB, you go back to the cabinet company. If it is still trading as ETNL.PK I won't post here for a year. WHAT SAY YOU!
That's one opinion. But I still think it would be easier to not report to the SEC and save the money for sponsoring race cars or something...like some companies
I don't get your point. The company is fully reporting. I thought the all .PK stood for was a quotation service.
Are you saying that if there is a .PK extension it means the company is not currently reporting to the SEC?