Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
As contentious as this election season has been, and no matter which side of the aisle you lean towards: you have to agree that at least it has brought out record numbers of voters. It is sad when a country with the freedoms we have, is lucky to normally have less than 30% of eligible voters decide our future.
OK.... Good luck with that!
It is called a loan, he ain't investing squat. By 'loaning' money, he puts himself ahead of shareholders if the company BKs, is bought out, or is re-imagined as whatever latest scam fad.
Don't forget the actor from 'CHiPs'.
Still green all day...
If there is a DTC chill, it won't matter if they RS(most common reason for 'd') or not the chill stays.
But apparently not all brokerages worry about chills, TDA is blocking one that others are allowing.
With real (non-pink) stocks DD means Due Diligence, with garbage (pink) stocks DD means Doo Doo.
I am sure he meant 'some REAL AND VALID reason', not 'some BS P&D reason'.
The 'valuation' post, in the stickies tells all anyone needs to know. I think those 'valuations' have ~95% track record of the stock being suspended or collapsing.
My wife does in-home assistance with the elderly, and has fielded many calls from MS tech-support. Now, mind you, her clients are 80+ and most would not allow a computer in their house. She had one time when the caller accused her of lying when she told him 'Mary' didn't have a computer, she proceeded to inform him that she was speaking to him on a rotary phone and 'Mary' didn't even have a digital clock. She got a kick out of him calling her every name in the book, as he hung up.
He has posted 3 or 4 times in the last few days. Nothing much, just agreeing with other posts about low volume and odd trades.
If you are truly concerned about it, why not contact the SEC? Oh, that is right, because then they would have to shut done that scam.
Maybe people are realizing that they never should have bought that crap, in the first place, and are trying to unload before it gets any worse than it already is.
I believe he is saying that since he knows of lawsuits that the company has not filed an 8k for, it becomes equivalent to insider information. The company's failure to file may have created a problem for anyone that stumbles across the lawsuits.
EDIT: It is kind of a stretch, but he is trying to make a point.
I'm shocked at how many posts I have made. I didn't realize I was that active here. I would have guessed closer to your count.
I am getting a little nervous myself. We haven't heard from him in some time.
The #2 poster on the board is a 'newbie'???
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/boardposters.aspx?boardid=15784
maronti1 Member Level Thursday, 09/08/16 06:52:06 AM
Re: None
Post # of 91964
REALIZED
MARK
.YOU ARE THE
.
WORST CEOOOO EVER
ZERO ACCOMPLISHEMENT
5 PLUS YEAR
WHO OWNS SKIN TRADE??????????????????????
SOMEBODY PLEASE ASK MARK
WHO IS THE INVESTOR?
Quote:
soooo?..sell
Trade rags may be free, but the only way followers see them is from FB posts. Which are, as you say, 'only seen by a handful of followers'.
My guess would be that a state with known mines, could easily tell callers that the info is BS. But a state without mines probably would give callers the run-around, not wanting to look like they don't know what is going on in their district.
'trades' = trade magazines
So we are going to hear about this wonderous development from an industry rag, not from Mark.
Hey, cut him some slack. It worked when he was posting '$5 sustainable?'. What does it matter that it took over 2 years of the same BS posts?
He has already sold the company. He sold it to a bunch of bagholders, er excuse me, shareholders. He can walk away whenever they stop buying his BS, and still have plenty of jingle in his pockets.
How about a 'Comptometer'? Have one in storage at work that a former employee used for over 60 years. She could total a customer's ledger account card faster than anybody with a calculator (which she would not allow in her area).
Here is the SEC complaint that I mentioned. Not all companies are mentioned, but it looks like Bronson is Fairhills.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2012/comp-pr2012-165.pdf
Don't know when the shares were issued, but IIRC the SEC had a problem a few years back with several companies that did business with Fairhills. That is what threw MIKP back onto a DTCC chill within days of being released.
If they are planning on using it for disclosures that would then require an 8k (assuming SEC registrant).
The big problem is: they were too expensive to produce as an aerosol, so let us use piston cans which are even more expensive to produce.
I don't think you can chart it or do much of anything else, but use /GC to see gold futures pricing.
Come on now....
You know it wasn't 950, it was 985....
Still just as funny, just need to be accurate.
People wonder why the SEC doesn't do anything about the thousands of scams in the OTC.
It is because they are too busy trying to keep up with complaints filed by shareholders who think they know the law.
What was posted here yesterday was not insider information. Someone had a conversation with IR and reported about it here. Was any of that information restricted, not in my opinion. Even if it was, he is not an insider, and posting it in a public forum is not necessarily against the law. The law is that he can not trade based upon it, posting is not trading. The only one that may have stretched the law, would be IR. But, again, IMO there was nothing restricted in his posts.
The use of equity in some form should be a given, therefore mentioning the probability of using it, is not restricted. Now, if he had been told specific details, that would be different.
IE:
Money-Is-Us is getting 3 cajillion shares @ $.00000001 available to sell immediately. Would be restricted.
????
If he is, then I must be too. We will see a small pullback from nervous sellers. And there is a small gap at that level.
He is talking year to date, everyone else is talking Q2 only. Although his .14 was wrong, it is .13 YTD. But that means we cut our quarterly loss by over 50%. Looks good to me!!
Not negative, just realistic. You can almost set your watch, or calendar, by how Ford trades.
BUT! BUT! BUT! BUT! THAT WAS THEIR TRILLION DOLLAR PROFIT GENERATOR!!!