Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Damn! You're generous!
I think I am actually a distant cousin of yours. Can I hit you up for $50?
I too am a little surprised that the WNFT price has stabilized here and not dropped further in the absence of concrete news.
Probably. That 100K was a single trade, not a trend.
What language is that page in?
More likely, there could have been some preliminary discussions that ended in "ok, let's table this for a while and talk some more once Lupkynis gets EMA approval.
Big Pharma is generally willing to wait if that resolves uncertainty.
That would imply that ERT is already public, if they are going to "uplist". DO you know if ERT is public an, if so, the trading symbol and exchange for it?
That is true.
The recent PR referred to a prospective uplist of a subsidiary. Do you thin that is QIND or ERT? Seems to me that "uplist" ,eans an already-public company, so it would be QIND that they are referring to.
Correct - ALPP needs to make this easier.
There is no law or regulation that says that an institution can't buy an OTC stock.
That said, many institutions have internal bylaws that restrict the range of stocks they can buy. Some of those bylaws may be of the form "must be on Nasdaq or NYSE", but more likely they would be things like must have audited financials, must have a certain market cap, must have a given level of daily dollar volume, etc.
Institutions CAN buy otc stocks, but few otc stocks meet the criteria applied by most institutions to everything in their portfolio.
Why would they need to cover? They can stay short do units, common or warrants as long as they need to.
Any sign of life for NDTP is progress.
My assumption is quite different. I am guessing tht Dr. Otiko has these guys lined up but only pays them when he wants something communicated. In between those events, they don't return calls.
I have put in several calls to IR over the last couple days and have not had anyone pick up or return my call.
I would love to see that, but in all honesty would probably bail long before it got to .40 unless it went there overnight.
Definitely. Getting new eyes on ASKH, especially in the context of a solid % price move, is a great thing. Maybe I should start putting more thought into refining my exit strategy. That would be a good problem to have.
You know for sure that nothing is happening when a board becomes dominated by guesses as to when shareholders will hear something.
Are we expecting any fireworks from the HD Wainwright conference tomorrow ((/13 in NYC) or will news likely wait until the bigger ECOC conference beginning 9/18 in Europe? I need to decide what to do with some expiring September calls - sell today or wait until later in the week. TIA
If the company were selling brick and mortar widgets a website error would not be a major concern.
However, for a company that intends to be doing ALL of its business over the web, a website with errors raises bigger concerns. It appears they have severe deficiencies in their quality control processes.
EDIT: I went in and corrected my own spelling error...:)
They might be able to use shares to make an acquisition, but no private company owners in their right mind would do a reverse merger into a shell without having a rock solid understanding of the share count.
This won't happen until the Calasse matter is resolved one way or the other.
Therefore I believe that we won't see a reverse merger for WNFT of any sorts, let alone with an attractive partner, until the Calasse case is finally resolved in court.
Additionally, no private company will touch Sharp's other shells until they know that when he says "there are this many shares out and here is who has them" that they can take that info to the bank. For that reason (although I don't own them and don't really care about them) I don't think GS will get anything done on ANY of his shells until Calasse is resolved.
Calasse knows he can hurt Sharp by keeping the court case, and therefore doubt about the accuracy of Sharp's representations about the shell, alive. Sharp can't afford to give in, as his whole business model relies on being able to accurately represent the share structure of his shells to potential merger partners.
We have a Mexican standoff that will only be resolved when the Calasse case is put to bed on way or the other.
That's odd - the record date is March 11, 2022. Six months ago.
A lot of traders may not even know about YOSH yet. YOSH does not come up at all in the Schwab trading platform. It usually takes a day before a new IPO shows up and is easily tradable.
I suppose I could call in an order if I really wanted to (I don't), but that would be a hassle.
My take is that Calasse is in it to the end. If he was going to bail, or accept a lowball offer, he would have done so.
Another consideration is that he may be simply motivated by spite, reasoning that "if I can't get the money I want, I can at least delay things so that Sharp's deal is in jeopardy and maybe falls through"..
Neither party here really needs the money. It has become a personal pissing match.
Unfortunately, 80% of the posts here are
"CE will be removed"
or
"CE removal never gonna happen"
There are lots of posts, but little or nothing that is new, useful or simply not some individual's assertion.
except for the really annoying gifs...
Volume in BBIG today is actually quite low compared to the average volume over the last 20 trading days.
Do you happen to know if the court hearing today is at 1 EDT or at 1 PDT? TIA
EDIT: Someone on StockTwits posted 1:30 PDT but I have seen conflicting posts.
I think they will find that the "quick curing" formulation is beneficial in other applications as well. Not only any other in-line manufacturing or assembly process, but other application where the target may be in motion. Certainly, if application requires shut down so that pipes and surfaces cool down first (?? I don't know if this is the case) then the required shutdown would be of shorter duration (read: cost less money) if the insulation cured quickly.
You were suspended and will miss the first 2 months of the season.
Not to worry, MVNT will probably miss them too.
We're all bozos on this bus...
Help me out here. Are the people who were forced to disgorge and pay in the suit that you cite the same people who are involved in FTRS? What exactly is their involvement with FTRS? TIA
Confusing. Thanks.
If I read it correctly, Daniel Drake was the interviewer and Daniel Ball is the CEO.
Can't tell the Daniels without a scorecard!
What about on the back end when VStock returns your common shares to Atrade? Will Atrade charge you a fee then?
KRTL volume is very low today.
It was not the CEO that resigned, it was a long time board member. Not a problem.
I understand that we are still at early days and I have read all the releases.
My point is simply that the story changes when we see real number, good or bad, as the result of operations. Not necessarily earnings, but we do need to see evidence of coatomer uptake, transaction volumes, etc. once operations are ramped up.
Right now we are still at the stage where the company, and many posters here, are telling us just how good it is going to be. The numbers will ultimately tell us whether that was true or not.
I don't think XTRM is being held back by MMs.
It is being held back by management's inability to get the company recognized as a builder (symbol and name change) and even more so by the self-dealing by the real estate agent who makes more money converting preferred shares under market than by selling any number of houses built by XTRM.
The financials will NEVER be good until the dilution through those toxic preferred shares ends. THey need to address buying out those shares or somehow getting out from under that burden.
I really don't give a Hostess Twinkie about a company's mission statement. I just want them to make money.:)
I do own some MONI shares - unfortunately at a loss from about a year ago. I still have some hope for the company and have not just bailed out - yet. I find the poorly written PRs to be off-putting. They do not inspire confidence.
While using a spelling and grammar check would help, the best fix for this would be for them to communicate some actual NUMBERS.