Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yep, home safe and sound. Funny about Tang and Kezar. They stopped the trial for LN and now FdA issuing a clinical hold. Would love to know Tang’s thinking on this.
Well hope U got out in time . Tang offers more than $1 a share for KZR ....will probably offer $10-$15 a share for AUPH .
Looks like he's trying for control of the severe LN market ...especially since VERA etc aren't pursing it
JMO
OMG. ...I just might have to buy some AUPH
Kiwi
No, opposite side of the state - 7 miles south of Daytona. Track of storm right now runs right through Orlando. Hoping it stays slow moving and our booked flight can get out Tues afternoon.
RMB. The Nephrologists my wife works with state their biggest problem is insurer push back due to cost of Lupkynis . Currently insurers in our area only want to cover for severe cases of LN where the patient has fairly rapid loss of kidney function ...ie for last best attempt ...and usually only for 6 mths .
Were you from the Tampa Bay Area ?.....looks to be pretty dicey next week
Good luck
Kiwi
Thanks for the article. I had previously seen it a while back and it is a good explanation of both drugs. However I guess it still comes down to what the person’s insurance co wants to do.
Yep, docked in Ft Lauderdale yesterday morning, rented a car and drove a couple of hundred miles north to spend the next few days seeing friends, etc where we spent 45 years of lives. Due to fly out of Orlando Tuesday afternoon, but now worried the approaching hurricane may throw a monkey wrench in that.
RMB. U might find this interesting
https://www.lupusencyclopedia.com/lupkynis-vs-benlysta-for-lupus-nephritis/
U back in the US or still aboard that floating Petri dish :--)
Kiwi
Do you think a potential acquirer will have that as a concern as well though. I suppose it would all depend on the price they would have to pay.
RMB Because of the expense of Lupkynis ...around $90k a yr ..insurers have major prior authorization hurdles often requiring Benlysta to be tried first . Benny is around $50k a yr and due to go generic in 2025
Could that be the reason for reticence by potential buyers?
Don't they need a sale soon, hopefully before the end of the year?
Lupkynis is a drug owned by Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. It is protected by 3 US drug patents filed from 2021 to 2023 out of which none have expired yet. Lupkynis's patents will be open to challenges from 22 January, 2025. Based on its patents and exclusivities, its generic launch date is estimated to be Dec 07, 2037. Details of Lupkynis's patents and their expiration are given in the table below.
Patent # US7332472 Cyclosporine analogue mixtures and their use as immunomodulating agents
Expires: Oct, 2024 (11 days from now)
Status: Active
Patent # US11622991 Protocol for treatment of lupus nephritis
Expires: Dec, 2037 (13 years from now)
Status: Active
Patent # US10286036 Protocol for treatment of lupus nephritis
Expires: Dec, 2037 (13 years from now)
Status: Active
https://pharsight.greyb.com/drug/lupkynis-patent-expiration
Kiwi- Thx for the explanation re KZR.
Hard to believe they were $30+ once!
Oh, wait....so were we
cheers
Why isn't the medical world listening?
They seem to be ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ..........................
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of voclosporin for the treatment of lupus nephritis in the United States
CONCLUSIONS:
Following the inclusion of updated data in the cost-effectiveness analysis, voclosporin remains a cost-effective therapy for the treatment of active LN including in a Black, Hispanic, and Latino subpopulation, substantially below the ICER willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY.
https://www.jmcp.org/doi/full/10.18553/jmcp.2024.23324
Moose. The overall renal response rate ( ORR ) was higher in KZR's P2 trial .
I originally liked the KZR data better than the AUPH data
Wasn't the "data" only from a very small pt group; was it only about 5 people?
Can't remember but was puzzled why you liked it and thought it somehow superior to AUPH's
Even less competition for U now Jess
So, monopoly on best-in-class for many years to come and soon to be SOC, not too bad Kiwi. I don’t know why you’re not invested yet in this. Anyway, I hope we have a BO soon here. Good luck on your other stocks.
Jess. No mention of pursuing the LN indication at Vera's KOL day today . Next catalysts for AUPH likely to be Kidney Week at the end of October ( if they present anything ) and their next earnings report
Kiwi
would be nice if we had a best case scenario, but no we are still stuck with pete, a low share price and time running out for a corner on the market. with pete at the helm the corner we will soon be on is a cardboard box on the corner of the freeway
Jess. VERA's Atacicept is already fast tracked for IgAN and will complete their P 3 in this kidney disease in Q2 2025 . They will announce Oct 2nd if they will pursue the LN indication ...using the same drug . If they pursue the LN indication I expect them to also seek a Fast Track designation for this indication as well.
So far Atacicept is the only drug shown to prevent decline in kidney function ( eGFR ) in IgAN . The other IgAN drugs just slow the decline .
Theres some 96 wk data due Q4 2024
So if they go into a P 3 for LN ....they will be using a drug thats already fast tracked and likely to have been approved for IgAN .... and on the market for IgAN by the time they finish the LN trial.
So it's definitely possible within 3 yrs to be approved as an expanded indication...... of a drug already being prescribed.
But as you have posted previously . The above is a best case scenario and theres a lot of ways this can derail .
I'm obviously long VERA and no position in AUPH ( although I think Tang is working to sell the Co )
Kiwi
Let’s for the sake of argument that VERA will conduct a p3 trial and that they think it’s successful and merits an approval from the FDA, the whole shebang will take at least a minimum of three years. Then there’s the issue of long term sustainability like Lupkynis’s sustainability of 3-years and counting. That is a total of 6 years minimum. You’ll probably have grandchildren by then.
There’s so many IFS Whala, but I hope they achieve it for kidney patients sake.
Jess
LN landscape is littered with dead corpses of clinical trials. For patients sake, I hope you will be right with your 4th/5th/6th try.
Ghosted the other board there eh Zzatty boy. I was just wondering is you could tell me how many Zzientists they have here. Looking to invest and thought I’d use your strategy of whether they have Zzientists here. Let me know. And don’t be a stranger on the other board. You’re dearly missed.
yes he got that deal done
it did nothing for shareholder value and the 10 million was barely enough to cover is undeserved pay package for a year.
so it was a zero net value at present to the company and shareholders.
Well he got this deal done
he needs to be accountable to someone, tang is as good as we have seeing pettie has never felt accountable to shareholders who have funded this project as he rapes and pilfages the bank account.
better hurry before kamala taxes us on unrealized gains and increased capital gains tax
12 still moves me, 20 pays off my mortgage.
either way pettie walks with 10's of millions for a job never done
I believe the boxed warnings are the same but can’t be totally sure. In this release, similar to the UK, it indicates the boxed warnings in the EU, but the news releases for Japan does not give enough details: https://www.auriniapharma.com/investors-and-media/news-events/press-releases/detail/263/aurinia-announces-european-commission-approval-of
Question: Does the UK, the EU, and Japan have the same black box warnings as the U.S.? Is there flexibility in dosing?
Agree that that is the only way to interpret the massive buy by Tang. Good things to look forward to
Pete's works for Tang now . Tang is on the BOD and
it matters not for us
as long as the BoD overrides shareholders votes and pete stays on the board and ceo this is nothing more than a penny stock
pete is running it with his 10 million draw a year.
pete is a plague to this stock.
Otsuka Receives Approval in Japan for Lupkynis® as a Treatment for Lupus Nephritis
RSS
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Otsuka) announces that the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW) has approved Lupkynis® (voclosporin) for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN), an inflammation of the kidneys caused by systemic lupus erythematosus, an autoimmune disease.
Lupkynis is a novel, oral immunosuppressive agent developed for the treatment of LN. It suppresses the immune system by inhibiting calcineurin, an enzyme that is crucial for the proliferation and activation of T cells, an important element of the immune system.
In the U.S., Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Aurinia) received FDA marketing approval in January 2021 for Lupkynis as a treatment for active LN in adults. In September 2022 Otsuka received European Commission (EC) approval for Lupkynis as the treatment for active LN in EU member countries. Otsuka has subsequently received reimbursement in several EU countries as well as in the UK.
In December 2020, Otsuka and Aurinia announced that they entered into a collaboration and license agreement for the development and commercialization of oral voclosporin for the treatment of LN in Japan, the European Union (EU), and the UK, Russia, Switzerland, Norway, Belarus, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Ukraine.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical has been committed to research and development that contributes to patients and their families in order to meet unmet medical needs worldwide, focusing on cardiovascular, renal and autoimmune diseases as one of which are among our priority areas.
About lupus nephritis
Lupus nephritis (LN) is an inflammation of the kidneys caused by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The kidneys are vital organs, and LN is an irreversible and progressive condition that puts them at risk for long-term complications. If left untreated, this kidney inflammation impairs kidney function and can lead to permanent kidney damage and even kidney failure, known as end-stage renal disease (ESRD). LN is one of the most serious complications of SLE.
In Japan, the number of SLE patients is estimated to be between 60,000 and 100,000, with women accounting for 90% of cases. It is particularly prevalent among women aged 20 to 40.1 Asians have a higher incidence of renal involvement compared to Caucasians, with 21% to 65% of Asian patients (living in Asia) with SLE having developed LN by the time of diagnosis, and 40% to 82% developing it over time.2 The development of LN in SLE patients often occurs at a relatively young age and is believed to increase the risk of end-stage renal failure, leading to a deterioration in life expectancy. The challenge is to achieve rapid remission of glomerulonephritis with reduction in proteinuria, while avoiding long-term use of high doses of steroid medication.
About the clinical trials AURORA 1 and AURORA 23, 4
The MHLW approval is based on data from clinical trials, including AURORA 1 and AURORA 2.
The AURORA 1 international phase 3 trial was conducted with the primary endpoint of renal response at 52 weeks. A total of 357 patients with active LN from age 18 to 75 were enrolled in the trial, of whom 179 patients and 178 patients were randomly assigned to the voclosporin and placebo groups, respectively.
Both the voclosporin group and the placebo group were co-administered with mycophenolic mofetil and oral steroids during the trial, with a regimen to reduce the dose of steroids. The proportion of patients achieving renal response at 52 weeks was significantly higher in the voclosporin group at 40.8% compared to 22.5% in the placebo group (p<0.001).
AURORA 2 evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of voclosporin compared to placebo in 216 patients with LN (116 in the voclosporin group and 100 in the placebo group) who received an additional 2 years of treatment following completion of AURORA 1. The long-term safety and tolerability was assessed and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed.
Reference
1. Information Center for Rare Diseases https://www.nanbyou.or.jp/entry/53 (as of September 2024)
2. Jakes, RW. et al.:Arthritis Care Res. 2012; 64(2): 159-168
3. Brad H Rovin, Y K Onno Teng, et al. Efficacy and safety of voclosporin versus placebo for lupus nephritis (AURORA 1): a double-bling, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021; 397: 2070-80
4. Amit Saxena, Ellen M. Ginzler, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term voclosporin treatment for lupus nephritis in the phase 3 AURORA 2 clinical trial. Arthritis & Rheumatology Vol. 76, No. 1, January 2024, pp 59-67
Z. as U know ...Lupkynis targets T cells . AUPH has begun their own BAFF / APRIL program for treating LN ...just several years behind VERA
Inhibiting both BAFF and APRIL is thought to be ( based on the past several yrs of research ) , a more effective way of inhibiting B cell production which is a key factor in developing Lupus Nephritis