Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks for your thoughts
L0L !!!
L0L !!! L0L !!!
L0L !!! L0L !!! L0L !!!
Ted says I am a bit nasty today. It is clear he does not like to be outed.
Ted didn't like my calling his talk of index funds selling shares if they go below 500 million minimum market cap deceitful. He admits he went on the 500 million is what he "heard was commom " whatever that means It is a fact that the Russell 2000 has a minimum of 300 million and to very closely follow the Russell index funds, other companies index funds do have to follow that as well. So it comes down to either it was purposely deceitful or carelessly stupid to suggest that the 500 million number was the cut off and LWLG was close to it. I guess he can pick which one he thinks fits better. And yes it was a catastrophizing comment (fortelling a negative future) for him to have made just as he likely indended.
Ted says that a long term holder like an index fund will increase volatility with a low float stock and he uses the fact that buyers, which I assume to be on the upside, end up chasing a smaller number of shares increasing buying volatility. Makes sense to me, supply and demand.
He was saying higher bid/ask spreads are higher with small caps and low floats and on big selling days a strong holder wants other strong holders buying and that won't be index funds, true. But if index funds weren't holders there would likely be more rattled retail investors joining and selling even more shares than if index funds were standing pat. Remember, there are many, many other index funds that follow the Russell 2000 than just Vanguard and Blackrock and their backing the company by holding shares is a blessing when there is selling pressure. Yes, you want buyers to come in to mitigate the share price going down by not joining into the selling pressure but the next best thing is strong holders standing pat. He brings into the situation shorters coming in to further push prices lower when index funds are there but that would likely occur if they weren't there as shorting occurs for many reasons that have nothing to do with index funds holding. Strong institutional holdings when they get to 50% or more, is a partial deterrent to shorting even more so as share count goes up. Introducing all these elements, some make some sense but others don't and the one's that don't, they certainly don't bolster his stance on index funds being no use to the company.
In the above, again Ted uses oversimplification to bolster statements around index funds being a problem for a stock on strong down days. He uses some correct statements of index funds as to the effect with buying coming in but that doesn't substantiaate those that are around selling. He uses multiple "reasons" to try to substantuate his original premise about index funds but this is a deceitful debater's use of a tactic called "The Shotgun Approach" or another better term, "The Predonderance of Garbage Defence." It is meant to sound good on the surface, confuse the naive, as you are hit with one "reason" after another but people need to be wary of people who use these techniques. The next step could very well be his coming in as he often does with more "reasons" some new, some repeats which is called "Stacking the Deck. It is meant to exhaust the debatee. His last set we talked of would qualify as this as well and he uses it to wear other posters out on this board to get the last word in.
I know this is convoluted but to nail down what is going on it will be trying to follow Ted Talk.
I agree, I have had him on ignore forever.
I again suggest everyone put him on ignore except Xena, and she can just call bullshit to everyone of his posts. Posters just can’t help but debate him if they see his crap, better if they have him on ignore and don’t see it.
I see Ted is still the #1 talking point on this board. It's a shame the troll has you all wrapped up in the games. He's actually a very good troll and I kind of respect it.
It would all be over if people would just block him and ignore him. But you can't because he says just the right thing to keep you going. It's genius.
The board has turned into an absolute dumpster fire and a lot here are to blame for it. Please, for the sake of this once truly good informative board, do the right thing and block the guy and ignore him. So many adults acting like teenagers clogging it up with pointless arguments.
Not that anyone cares about my opinion but maybe you need an outsider to tell you how childish you all look and act. It's pathetic.
Newbies!! Ted is a gaslighter
Follow Vanguard and BlackRock
They own well over 16 million shares
There is one and only one argument you give...
over...
and over....
and over......
approaching ad infinitum.
Your arguments are nothing more than repetitive B.S.
30 Bullet Points - MEGA-DUE DILIGENCE starts here!!
1) SilOrix - "Millions od Devices" with LWLG Insiide https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172854141
2) Space Exploration https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172863334
3) NIST https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172863260
4) Eliminate Driver https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172863241
5) Timeline to Commercialization https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172863125
6) Foundries Scale to Volume EASILY AND EFFECTIVELY https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172862847
7) US Foundry with Polymer Plans https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172862748
8) Clues for the Adept https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172862734
9) Vanguard up 25% in QUARTER https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172862719
10) Lab Expansion https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172862409
11) Chromosol https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172862269
12) Lebby "We work with Big Silicon Foundries" https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171981222&txt2find=WORLD%20RECORDS
13) Mind blowing Industry tried for 40 years but FAILED https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172861948
14) 800Gbs Rollout - Quickest in History of Photonics - LWLG Entry Point https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172860545
15) 2023 Banner Year Highlights https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172860536
16) Negotiations May License Deal https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172858679
17) Let's Discuss the Competition https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172858392
18) Planet Micro Additional Deals 2023 and 2024 https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172857576
19) SAM/SOM Goals https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172857485
20) ECOC - Most Innovative Product Award https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172854386
21) History of LWLG https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172853529
22) Lebby at Wainright https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172853203
23) Lebby explains the DOUBLE WIN https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172853188
24) PRODUCTION PRODUCTION PRODUCTION https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172853139
25) LWLG/Intel/Ayar/Global Foundries thread https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172853092
26) Direct evidence connection between GlobalFoundries, (Intel)Ayar Labs, LWLG EO polymers https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172853075
27) LWLG to the rescue of Intel/Ayar/GF!!! https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172852886
28) Polariton - Product with World Record setting LWLG Inside https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172227669
29) Let's discuss the Growth Funnel of Customers https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172661039&txt2find=growth%20funnel
30) GOALS - Near term external activities & goals https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172840021&txt2find=production%20trials
Somehow I've been elected to explain this nonsese
You're sorry..
I agree...
EOM.
Run TP Run
You are pretending that you know what is meant by chip yield which is what "extremely high yields in > 1000 poled devices" is all about and you have decided to give it a new definition "yields of another sort" No links no nothing but I provide the links below. .
Here..... go learn what yield at a foundry is all about.:
https://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=31338&seqNum=4
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/yield
https://www.valin.com/resources/blog/wafer-yield-semiconductor-industry#:~:text=In%20the%20semiconductor%20industry%2C%20yield,sunk%20cost%20for%20these%20fabs.
All of these talk about the end product. The successful wafer yield percentage.
Lightwave does not obtain chip yields through PVT trials. Only foundries do.
Run TP run
L_R
I’m sorry you see my attempts to unravel this mystery and share what I’ve learned in that way
There is the one and only reply xena can give
B.S.
Thank you for such a great counter argument.
90% of folks don't understand that gaslighting means a total lie.
Something that is said that is wrong but once repeated somehow makes sense.
X honest.
Somehow I've been elected to explain this nonsese short stuff posters, who purport to have no interest in the price, no they are just here to help guide new investors. X is calling Bull S
You know, we have the top in the field Scientists/Engineers (th) lead by the worlds leader of Photonics, but we really do not have the business end at that same level. We have some phenomenal BOD’s business people who have histories with similar disruptive technology start ups, that I would love to see them having more leadership on how to make this company more professional on the business side. The doctor is doing everything right in his field, other than giving us some more news lol, but some of the last couple board of directors have business as their sweet spot, which could more quickly make the stock more valuable.
Ha
Disrespectful? Ok Captain Gaslighter
Your posts are detrimental to the quality of the board and continue to obfuscate important issues and advances made by the company.
Your posts are meaningless dreck that should be ignored by everyone.
Your post does not help improve the quality of the board and contributes nothing helpful to the discussion.
What a waste. Your post had almost nothing to do with what we were talking about.
I guess you missed the post where the various kinds of yields were discussed. They test all kinds of things and the tests yield a percentage of success or not. This was discussed year. I think it was KCC talking about it.
15 years of getting various yields on their poled devices. You read a paragraph and think you know something. Not saying you’re wrong, but you definitely could be.
X posted he saw poling right there in their lab. You insist it has to be done in a foundry. Some of us know there are different kinds of yields. You insist the yields are on chips.
No, I’m done because you’re being both close minded and disrespectful
Depends on what kind of dog you are talking about.
Some dogs will gnaw the fence posts off so the other dogs can follow.😄
You can’t figure that out? 90% of the comments here are either attacking anyone that is not an obvious basher that has a non-bobblehead sycophant view. But none of you all can see when you’re being played equally by fake hypers who tell you 15 times a day how bad SHORTERS are but in the moment of honesty, admitted that they love them and want to see the stock go lower. Also another phony poster who pretends to have knowledge that even the CEO would say is total bullshit if they heard it direct that there were going to be deals any day, for the last 12 years, when the same person sold your stock at $19 and and then worked with shorts and did not consider even buying it back again until it fell 75%.
I just grew up learning about hustlers and how they robbed people that are too naïve. I’m trying to help them see reality. I’m 100% long and strong, and can’t wait to celebrate when we get the first real published financial order, but this message board is just becoming total garbage.
T,his is made up of bashers, who idiots think that we need 30 different replies, to each one of their posts like they actually think that it will talk them out of their probably paid opinion. That is the height of stupidity. Then more than half of the other people talking about shorts, as if this is the only company that is shorted. The real question is if we have the proverbial golden goose that the world needs in a multi billion dollar industry, in spite of the freaking shorts, the stock should be riding in the mid- double digits by now, and all the other phony excuses are BS.
If the owners of these data centers that could save tens, or even billions of dollars in energy savings with our GOO don’t already know about us, then we should never spend another penny at any of these dogs and pony shows with all of the technology geeks there.
Just sayin.
There are many kinds of yield
Lurk-Against utter dbags like TP and you- that’s fighting the good fight.