Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, as I said:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170071280
Unlike many, I married into the legal profession via my Kick-Ass wife... 24hr access.
Yeah... I just have to show her off ... she is a Fu**ing Bad-Ass.
Legal Professional - Former NCAA Athlete - Fitness Trainer.
"Seems to me"
What is projection
https://www.healthline.com/health/projection-psychology
Johari Window
https://www.communicationtheory.org/the-johari-window-model/
...I think someone is projecting again.
douche chills
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/douche_chillsSeems to me
"have no monies left to buy"?
..Who the hell trades with "no monies left to buy"???
Again...This Right Here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170034689
The Calasse appeal can get tossed by the appellant court at any time ...or, perhaps it takes a little bit...Who knows for sure, but based on the facts linked above, who cares??
WNFT... an SEC reporting - Fully audited company with no dilution and no debt ..Who the hell cant wait two minutes?
By the way, those suggesting that George is only suing Calasse for 15k in the "fiduciary duty suit" need to brush up on their law... He is suing for "Damages in excess of $15,000" to show it is "in excesses"of small claims and is pertinent to the court in which it was filed ...Further more, this "fiduciary duty suit" does not hold up or effect the appeal (other than the leverage it provides Sharp overall).
Mr. Sharp has pent 6 figures on this venture not to mention a LOT of his time. Think about it. He can do anything he wants here in the meantime.
The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.
— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) August 19, 2022
This Right Here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170034689
The Calasse appeal can get tossed by the appellant court at any time ...or, maybe it takes a little bit...Who knows for sure, but based on the facts linked above, who cares??
WNFT... an SEC reporting - Fully audited company with no dilution and no debt ..Who the hell cant wait two minutes?
Mr. Sharp has pent 6 figures on this venture not to mention a LOT of his time. Think about it. He can do anything he wants here in the meantime.
The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.
— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) August 19, 2022
I think you got mixed up some how... I was responding to your post here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170028480
...you asked asked the question:
Any guesses on where the floor ends up being?
In short... I could continue to go round and round here with a select few, but Im going to go do THIS (below) instead.... Just a few of these warm days left before I shut it down for winter...
Simply put, Ive got the legal connections and know what can, and cannot happen here (Good, Bad or Ugly). ....This will get resolved quite favorably in my opinion.
A good weekend to all!
Yeah... I am.
Are you saying the appellate judges are looking at it right now " in real time" before the settlement phase has even ended
You are incorrect...
Court of appeal in this case is only looking for potential errors of law in the lower/District courts findings -and/or- if the evidence presented initially was legally sufficient to support the district courts order in the first place.
The ONLY time new evidence might be allowed (key word "might"...) is if it could be shown that evidence was discovered prior to the entry of judgment by the lower court and was disallowed.
That is not the case here.
Yes, pretty basic stuff. Unless one wishes to add a dysmorphic context to what I am saying.
Your strong point is "wait till November"...? Really??
I'm looking forward to satisfactory resolution here.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170034104
....moving towards finality.
The appellate court may very well be reviewing it in real time.... Or perhaps it takes more time... Its anyone's guess really.
But when you say things like:
But he will get his day in court
...In short, this Calasse appeal can get tossed by the appellant court at any time.
The appellant court's decision is NOT reliant, contingent or connected in any way to this new breach of fiduciary duty case.
..To put it a better way, That is simply not true as a matter of realistic functionality (or perhaps "sane functionality")
Yes, Ive read the 10-12G (months ago)
Lets just say this that in some alternative universe, Calasse wound up keeping his shares, do you really think he would shoot himself in the foot by attempting to block lucrative scenarios/deals that Sharp has put together?
Calasse's whole case is about retaining erroneous shares of GOFF/WNFT acquired via extremely dubious means. Calasse has been shot down twice in a court of law... He will be again in my opinion.
In short, the appellant court has to find that there was an an error in law regarding the previous courts decision ... Its just not going to happen.
That is simply not true.
Hey MBA! ... In my response to Jazzy here are a few more thoughts as well...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170033317
Thanks for the kind words.. I'm here to make money like everyone else, but I try to play it straight while doing so.
Here are some other thoughts.... Nowhere does it say that the Callsse appeal can't get tossed by the appellant court at any time - and Mr Sharp still moves forward with his breach of fiduciary duty suit anyway.
In other words, one case doesn't really hinge on the other (although the fiduciary duty suit may procure a response from Calasse that is positive for Sharp and/or shareholders)
In short, I still believe that Calasse doesn't have much substance where his appeal is concerned (except the ability to legally drag things out).
The above being said....
Even if he was allowed to keep his shares, at least the matter would be closed and Mr Sharp would be able to processed with a reverse merger (or what ever he pleases) due to the fact that there would be a definitive share structure in place.
So really... In my opinion, the issue here is not really -"what if" its just "When"- Mr, Sharp Gets Calasse out of the way so he can bring WNFT to fruition.
Time and the lack of a definite share structure have been the true enemies here.
Worst case scenario ... It may sting a little, but if Calasse somehow keeps his shares, at least it will be over and done with... and then WNFT can move forward.
As I stated earlier, WNFT is still an SEC reporting - Fully audited company...
It has no dilution and no debt. And those a VERY good things.
Good luck my Friend. I hope you fill... I'm pretty sure it will work out for all of us playing here.
Hard to tell but this is pretty straight forward speech here.
The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.
— Worldwide NFT (@WorldwideNFTInc) August 19, 2022
Short update.$GVSI waiting for the judge to sign the order barring claims$SRNW preparing documents for the forward split$WNFT preparing litigation against Calasse for breach of fiduciary duty$FORW shhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) September 20, 2022
Actually we sat by my swimming pool (no phones involved) and I paid nothing for his opinion... just two fellas shooting the shit.
Feels like you're aiming something at me.... Just posting information here. And no, I did not know that Calasse lives in Australia.
... Deeeeeeeep Breaths. Oxygen is good.
So I talked to my neighbor/attorney regarding Mr Sharp's tweet.
$WNFT preparing litigation against Calasse for breach of fiduciary duty
Short update.$GVSI waiting for the judge to sign the order barring claims$SRNW preparing documents for the forward split$WNFT preparing litigation against Calasse for breach of fiduciary duty$FORW shhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) September 20, 2022
..back out early today.... (Made 300 dollars...lol). Too many new shares keep getting added here. Gonna quit playing with fire. A sincere good luck to the hardcore longs here.
...well ok. I'll probably buy in again if it takes a hard turn south... (I'm a junkie...lol)
I missed the early AM dip but Filled a few 100k the last two minutes of the session (tail end of that dump, literally).
I'm expecting Brian to put on his worst suit and best sneakers (I cant resist busting his balls for some of his wardrobe choices) and lay out something positive.
Is Sharp gonna be a money man? $$$$ loan HMBL some cash?... Buy an interest via FORW beyond their current involvement? Guess we find out ...
Cryptic tweets from him as usual.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/secure/post_reply.aspx?message_id=169997646
I'm expecting Brian to put on his worst suit and best sneakers (I cant resist busting his balls for some of his wardrobe choices) and lay out something positive.
Now that IS funny... just made me gut laugh... Thanks for that.
In short, the best advice I can give is this.
If you are not an attorney, nor do you have access to a large firm as I do....
Spend the time and resources to speak with a legal profession regarding these matters.
...If one can afford to play the OTC, hopefully they can afford a few hundred dollars to get it right.
Good thoughts... If i am wrapping my head around your statement correctly, it seems close to what i suggested earlier today perhaps?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169992881
Might "preparing litigation" be enough to bring Calasse to his senses and settle reasonably?
...I'm betting Mr Sharp would back track his hardball stance if he could just to be done with this phase of the process and move forward, realize a return on his investment and hard work.
The appeal by itself is weak in my opinion. GOFF was a scam. Period.
All that the SC will look for is if the lower court made a mistake when everything was presented.
Without talking to "My Guy" yet, I'm assuming that Sharp is trying to prove a breach of fiduciary duty in order to show that Calasse has no right to the shares in the first place. If that is the case, I would assume that means that Calasse presented something (to the appellant court) that puts in question the legality of the lower courts decision. (??)
Thanks, I suppose scoffers (of my posts today) might ask themselves...
Who would have made you more money had you listened their summations.
That being said, I am no Mother Teresa ... When I'm looking to buy, Im a little more Con
...And when Im looking to sell I may be more Pro
..BUT, I will use truthful information to achieve both (to the best of my ability)
Informed conversations or emotional responses punctuated with nonsense and capital abbreviations.
Comedic relief (occasionally, quite irreverent comedic relief in my case) has its time and place...but come on.
Just wow.... I will let you post speak for itself.
Yo might want to re-read my post.
Without talking to "My Guy" yet, I'm assuming that Sharp is trying to prove a breach of fiduciary duty in order to show that Calasse has no right to the shares in the first place.
I would assume that means that Calasse presented something (to the appellant court) that puts in question the legality of the lower courts decision. (??)
Without talking to "My Guy" yet, I'm assuming that Sharp is trying to prove a breach of fiduciary duty in order to show that Calasse has no right to the shares in the first place. If that is the case, I would assume that means that Calasse presented something (to the appellant court) that puts in question the legality of the lower courts decision. (??)
This is just a semi-educated guess... I will know much more later today.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169995208
... I suppose that my biggest mistake (in the post linked within my post) was thinking that there might be some sort of speedy resolution to this matter.
I certainly will... His advice was pretty much the only reason I was afforded the luxury of being 90% cash during the July 8th shit-show, basically selling most of my position the very day my shares became available (ameritrade) after the 3-1 split.
He is the one that gave me the information to derive the conclusions (prior to the July 8th massacre) in the link below
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169329574
...as we all know now, he was spot on.
My next door neighbor is one of the partners in the law firm that my wife works for as a NALA Paralegal. I am curious what he will have to say about this as he is very well versed in securities law and has a LOT of experience with Nevada. I tried to contact him this AM but I wont be able to speak with him at any length until the afternoon (maybe a little sooner if his schedule allows) but if I discover any new/big revelations I will post accordingly.
Nothing against you personally, but regarding your re-tweet (as in - this gets done in two minutes)...well, wow... I have heard it all now.
This simply represents (the potential) to take much more time than the hoped for door-slam in Calasse's face.
Short update.$GVSI waiting for the judge to sign the order barring claims$SRNW preparing documents for the forward split$WNFT preparing litigation against Calasse for breach of fiduciary duty$FORW shhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) September 20, 2022
Message from Foote addressing all shareholders.
I derive only on conclusion from this post.....
That we all need to dose-up on psychedelics and then...
Watch Brian focus 100% on global brand, media, products, blockchain tech and sales growth.
Should be a really good time. (...maybe Brian should dose-up on psychedelics? Couldn't hurt at this point).