Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[FEARANDGREED]

Good thoughts... If i am wrapping my head around your statement correctly, it seems close to what i suggested earlier today perhaps?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169992881

Might "preparing litigation" be enough to bring Calasse to his senses and settle reasonably?
...I'm betting Mr Sharp would back track his hardball stance if he could just to be done with this phase of the process and move forward, realize a return on his investment and hard work.

Ans yes, I tend to agree with your statements below.

The appeal by itself is weak in my opinion. GOFF was a scam. Period.

All that the SC will look for is if the lower court made a mistake when everything was presented.

Or is there something about the legality of the process/procedure in which the lower courts decision was handed down (a loophole of sorts??) that would bring it in to question... thus my statement:

Without talking to "My Guy" yet, I'm assuming that Sharp is trying to prove a breach of fiduciary duty in order to show that Calasse has no right to the shares in the first place. If that is the case, I would assume that means that Calasse presented something (to the appellant court) that puts in question the legality of the lower courts decision. (??)

I am certainly NOT an attorney.... I will ask my neighbor ie partner in the firm my wife works for as soon as he has the time (which should be by end of day/early evening)