HUMBL Inc (HMBL)

[Topnotch20]

I buy small amounts of these scam stocks and leave them in my portfolio.
This one I found through forwardly 5 years ago.
After the latest news I'm thoroughly disappointed.
Don't ever invest what you can't afford to lose on these.

[dukeb]

Not "more to do."

It's 100% how boards show up on BoB.

I'm pretty sure the BoB "Rate" has more to do with posting activity than how popular or desired a ticker is.

[Major Profits]

"# 7 ON BREAKOUT AND MOST READ"

Arguing a lot can do that.

Anyhow, I'm pretty sure the BoB "Rate" has more to do with posting activity than how popular or desired a ticker is.

* Rate is the change in posting activity in the past 24 hours vs. the average from the prior 7 days after certain minimums have been met.

[TenKay]

You asked a question.

[jimr1717]

HMBL on the Forbes “Top Ten Tax Loss©” investments for the 4th straight year.

[ListenToTheTrees]

I am not debating the rules, please check the context of the post. You would think the person I was replying to would understand the rules vs trying to use them in incorrect context.

[TenKay]

“Is this board dedicated to Humbl Ventures and everything else is off topic?“

No.

Here are the guidelines for removal.

https://ihwiki.advfn.com/index.php/Moderators%27_Guidelines

You can direct questions to the Admin via PM (even non-paying members) or you can ask on the Q&A Board

https://investorshub.advfn.com/The-Question-and-Answer-Board-504

It is not appropriate to debate the rules on stock specific boards, those posts will be removed.

[ListenToTheTrees]

Is this board dedicated to Humbl Ventures and everything else is off topic?

[jimr1717]

#1 on the “Scammed Again Board”150th straight week!

[Catmandoo]

# 7 ON BREAKOUT AND MOST READ,, LOVE THE ATTENTION ON A SATURDAY,, KABOOOOOOOOM TIME NEAR....

[jimr1717]

Those shares will be gone if they ever pay for the pile of fertilizer that no one can find.

No One is Fooled

[Shawonsarker84]

Keep daydreaming! 85B AS raise to prevent RS in the future. This is a long way to go. HMBL management never did RS since 2022 when OS ballooned to 25B. Why bother doing it now?
No one is absolutely fooled.

[Huggy Bear]

Umm, this is Humbl Ventures now.

And it's described as a shell company on their own info page

[jimr1717]

Yes a 1 for 350,000 Reverse~Split should be soon

[price_and_volume]

Agreed - I expected R/S rather than the A/S raise.

Nobody should be surprised when HMBL…announces a huge reverse split.

Surely everyone on this board fully expects a RS filing to pop-up at some point.

It appeared some insiders were aware that an A/S raise was coming instead, but it surprised me.

I supposed it had to do w/ the massive convertible overhang which needs to be cleaned up first?

Whatevs.

[waterchaser]

Nobody should be surprised when HMBL…
announces a huge reverse split.

How long until the share-structure is cleaned up?

[ListenToTheTrees]

That is correct, majority of the content on this platform aren’t current day, it’s regarding 2020-2021, for example Hindenburg Research and George Sharp.

[price_and_volume]

Too bad, that cat was a money-maker!

We get it, you have a personal vendetta against George Sharp

Trade the flow, its the only thing that really matters.

All the stories & nonsense are a distraction.

$HMBL stock is on life-support & needs MUCH MUCH more than what a handful of believers are providing here & elsewhere.

How long until the share-structure is cleaned up?

PPS likely to continue struggling until that happens imo.

[jimr1717]

That’s Correct but the shareholders got Billions and Billions of Fresh shares

[Streett]

With all due respect, that patent is not the property of HMBL anymore...

[Acme Investments]

👇 I have an honest question?? What motivates you to go around to the lowest trading stocks available and tell people it's a scam??

[jimr1717]

Those saying it’s a scam are

Not Fooled by the promoters.

[ListenToTheTrees]

Those complaining and saying it’s a scam are ignoring the 5 years it took to get the patent and also pulling their highest performing product off the market due to regulations. If you don’t believe it, look at the return on the ETX Block 3, 5, and 10, 5 years later.

[waterchaser]

Nope.

[jimr1717]

Zero, None

[crowin]

any verifiable DD available to prove HUMBL is legit ?

[jimr1717]

Please go back to your 4 years of lurking

[ListenToTheTrees]

You’re just making stuff up now, get some help.

[dukeb]

Surf's motives have been clear from jump street. The notion that he (or any of the critics of this scam) are trying to suppress the price of the stock in order to create a buying opportunity is absurd.

HMBL is an insider enrichment scheme that began years ago and continues to this day.

Scammers, liars and non disclosing pumpers to start.

[ListenToTheTrees]

Thank you for admitting that your problem with GS predates HUMBL and confirms your motives.

[ListenToTheTrees]

I’ll lay it out, because the question is valid: why would someone refile a complaint against HUMBL after it was dismissed for failure to state a claim?

First, some context: the original class action against HUMBL was dismissed because the plaintiffs couldn’t meet even the basic legal standard, that is, articulating a claim upon which relief could be granted. That’s not a procedural hiccup. That’s a clear signal the court didn’t find the accusations legally viable. Yet, the plaintiffs, or more accurately, their attorneys, chose to refile.

Why? One of the most common reasons is litigation as a tool of extortion. The objective isn’t to win based on legal merit, it’s to create enough public pressure, legal expense, and disruption that the company is forced into a settlement. Even a meritless class action, if filed persistently, can generate damaging headlines, cast shadows over legitimate operations, and shift the burden of proof onto the defendant in the court of public opinion.

Then there’s the money. Plaintiff attorneys often operate on contingency or are funded by third parties, and they benefit from keeping the case alive not for justice, but for billable hours, legal fees, or eventual payout leverage. It’s a fee churn strategy legal theater designed to monetize the process, not the result.

Another angle? Publicity-motivated litigation. Filing against a high-profile or controversial company like HUMBL, especially one tied to crypto, fintech, or blockchain, is guaranteed to attract attention. In that way, the lawsuit becomes a stunt for both the plaintiff and the legal team. The goal isn’t necessarily to win, but to get eyes on a headline.

Let’s also not ignore fishing expeditions, where the lawsuit becomes a backdoor attempt to access corporate documents or sensitive information under the guise of discovery. It’s weaponized litigation used to dig, speculate, and maybe find something, anything, to twist.

Worse still, there’s the possibility of personal vendettas or strategic sabotage, lawsuits filed not for redress but revenge. Meant to distract leadership, exhaust resources, stir up shareholder anxiety, or tank external opportunities like audits, mergers, or partnerships. Even a baseless class action can act as a red flag during due diligence, stalling deals or complicating compliance efforts.

In short, this kind of malicious refiling weaponizes the court system. It’s not about holding a company accountable, it’s about manipulation, extraction, and obstruction. And yes, these tactics are well-documented under doctrines like malicious prosecution and tortious interference.

I’m sure the locals will question this, but they should also question why someone is this committed to pursuing a case that’s already been thrown out once for lacking a foundation. That’s where the real story is.

[surfkast]

Scammers, liars and non disclosing pumpers to start.
Not any one individual, but I can name many.
Especially ones who I believe I helped get busted from OTC scam companies to promoters.

[ListenToTheTrees]

We get it, you have a personal vendetta against George Sharp. That much is crystal clear. But let’s be honest for a moment: when exactly did this start? What was the real catalyst for all this obsession? Because, let’s not kid ourselves, HUMBL wasn’t the origin, it’s just the latest target of your long-standing crusade.

It’s hard to ignore that your criticisms of HUMBL are laced with a deeper, more personal animosity. That’s not analysis, it’s a grudge dressed up as due diligence.

So again, I’ll ask: what actually set you off?

[surfkast]

Promoter Further Gaslights HUMBL Investors By Making Light Of Extraordinary Dilution Risk, Telling Them They Ought To Sell Their Shares If They Really Think Insiders Are Going To Dump Them At Year End

Promoter George Sharp also responded on Twitter to the backlash following HUMBL’s disclosure, telling shareholders to sell if they think 6 billion new shares will suddenly appear.


This strikes us as classic gaslighting. To respond to Sharp, about 3 billion shares will suddenly become available for sale in December.

Sharp also chastised investors for not recognizing that insiders had earned these shares. The following individuals now have shares, on an as-converted basis, with the following current valuations:

Brian Foote, CEO of HMBL: $2.2 billion [Pg. 4]

Mark Grado, consultant for HUMBL and Block 30: $488 million [Pg. 5]

Jeffrey Hinshaw, Co-founder and COO of HUMBL: $353 million [Pg.5]

Michele Rivera, Global Partners and Team Lead at HUMBL: $250 million [Pg. 5]

Sharp has done extraordinarily well too. He parlayed his $200,000 investment in HUMBL into an investment valued at around $394 million as of March 9, according to his company Forwardly Inc.’s annual report. [Pg. 20 -21]

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

[surfkast]

Just a reminder of the blatant lies and to warn new investors of the bad history of scamming investors here. Sadly 99% of posters here KNOW this was and still is an ongoing scam. The facts are irrefutable. The 1% Hopium posters are great for entertainment though! Defending the company is super sized popcorn time reading!

[jimr1717]

But I noticed zero was wrong with what they found out about this fraud

[ListenToTheTrees]

Replies to 2021 posts and Hindenburg posts, getting desperate round these parts, but why…? I’ll keep looking around

[Major Profits]

"FACT-CHECK FRIDAY"

According to "Google AI":

Search Labs | AI Overview
There is no evidence that Hindenburg Research was shut down because they themselves were manipulating stocks.

Hindenburg Research, known for its short-selling and investigative reports on companies, recently announced its disbandment, according to multiple news sources.

Here's what the available information suggests:

Hindenburg's founder, Nate Anderson, stated the firm had completed its planned work and projects, and the decision to wind down wasn't due to threats, health issues, or personal issues.

The firm's work has been credited with leading to civil or criminal charges against many individuals, including billionaires and oligarchs.

While Hindenburg faced scrutiny and allegations regarding its practices, particularly from companies like Adani Group, these are not stated as reasons for the firm's closure.

There have been reports and accusations of Hindenburg potentially colluding with other firms, such as Anson Funds, regarding information sharing and market manipulation. However, these allegations haven't been definitively proven or stated as the cause of Hindenburg's closure.

The practice of short-selling, which Hindenburg utilized, itself is subject to debate and scrutiny, with arguments both for and against it.

In summary, while Hindenburg Research faced controversy and investigations regarding its operations, its shutdown is not explicitly stated to be a consequence of manipulating stock.

Search Labs | AI Overview
Hindenburg Research, a US-based investment research firm known for its short-selling reports, closed its operations in January 2025. Founder Nate Anderson cited the intense nature of the work and a desire to move on to other things, explaining it was part of a long-term plan to wind down after completing their research pipeline.

Here's a more detailed look at the reasons for the closure:

Intensity of the work:
Anderson repeatedly mentioned the "intensity and focus" of Hindenburg's work as a primary factor in his decision.

Completion of research pipeline:
Anderson stated that the firm had finished its pipeline of investigative ideas, marking the end of their research activities.

Personal desire for balance:
Anderson expressed a desire to spend more time with his family and pursue less stressful investments.

Sharing knowledge:
Anderson planned to share Hindenburg's investigative methods through materials and videos, effectively "open-sourcing" their approach.

No specific threat or pressure:
Anderson clarified that the closure was not due to any specific threats, health issues, or personal problems.

Regulatory pressure:
While not explicitly stated as the primary reason, some speculate that potential regulatory pressure from investigations into Hindenburg's reports, particularly the one on the Adani Group, may have contributed to the decision.

[carlson]

At LEAST!!!!!!!

[ListenToTheTrees]

LOL, glad you popped back on 4 years later, killer content! We know who bought the top. Still carrying a $6 average?

[carlson]

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!

[DoYourOwnDD]

Hindenburg shut down because they themselves were manipulating stocks. Makes sense why you'd love them, Jimbo, maybe you could have done coffee runs or emptied the office garbages when they were still scamming retail investors!

Market expert Ajay Bagga highlighted that Hindenburg operated in a legally ambiguous "grey zone," publishing negative reports while taking short positions, often in collaboration with hedge funds that did not disclose their stakes, raising concerns.

[jimr1717]

Their last one was Carvana CVNA and it’s my opinion that it’s the next Enron

[jimr1717]

“HUMBL’s expansion into Mexico, where HUMBL’s CEO boasted of recruiting 300 merchants in 3 days, has only 2 merchants listed as accepting payments. Even those two told us they aren’t currently accepting HUMBL payments; the business in Mexico is on hold pending changes to the platform, according to a local merchant working with the company.
Meanwhile, amidst these grand plans, HUMBL quietly issued preferred shares convertible into 5.54 billion common shares to insiders and family members, setting retail investors up for total annihilation when those shares unlock and become available for sale.”

Priceless

ListenToTheTrees

[ListenToTheTrees]

Can you post one of their recent reports? Anything in June?

[jimr1717]

Excellent! And they were 100% Correct in every single aspect.

[surfkast]

Just a reminder.

https://hindenburgresearch.com/humbl/

[ListenToTheTrees]

Yes, here we are.

[TenKay]

“Silly reply doesn’t get answered“

And yet here we are…

[ListenToTheTrees]

Another day, another problem 😂