Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
re: "...you're never getting your status back..."
good boy...youve finally said it
"...use the site the way you've been given it..."
ROTF!...you mean the supposed 3 posts a day...that are deleted regardless of content?
GO FUCK YOURSELF
"...you've got so many TOU violations and harassment issues..."
really?
than why was i not once jailed?
why was i not even once given an example of these supposed violations?
...youre simply FOS, "folding" to pumper/shill agenda
no wonder you support/endorse "the_mod_squads" abuse of power/fair play...you subscibe to it as well
MANY will be very pleased at my exit
ADIOS!
it appears admin has no interest
in even hearing about this "debate", much less addressing it...and i seem to be the poster child to confirm such, as i have been relegated to limbo for daring to question the policy
as posted earlier to grubmaster:
i came to IHUB years ago as an alternative to the spam filled [etc] RB, et al...the same IHUB that promoted itself as a site that would regulate/moderate in an effort to stimulate factual discussion of financial subjects...a good source for fair/balanced due diligence
do YOU believe that "vision" still exists today?
...or has integrity, honesty, factual due diligence, balance, etc, given way to the "pressures" of the group play and advertising/revenues?
...instead of stimulating factual discussion/debate, has it become a controlled [via mods] breeding ground for one sided manipulators?
while IHUB may be currently profiting by this MO, i submit that it may be short lived/"interrupted"...because there will be a point when it reaches critical mass
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=11149155
---------------
and as others have posted, it appears admin takes these comments as a personal affront, rather than what they are meant to be...suggestions to enhance the experience for everyone...not just a select few
--------------
note: but at the same time, there is no excuse for the back and forth arguing currently taking place here...take it to the parking lot ;)
dissention in the "troops" matt?...
"...That's not the only board where "moderation" is being abused..."
greg s
"...One of the better aspects about IHUB was the moderator/assistant feature but IMO it is being abused big time..."
Susie924
"...he has shown such poor ethics and integrity as a moderator that I can no longer bite my tongue. The man is plain hateful..."
Tina Marie
"...an assistant there that was allowed to make his own rules and run rampant..."
junkmasterg
--------------
and thats only in the past couple of hours, and for different boards/mods...not to mention what goes on on stock specific boards...and you know my experiences
imo admin ignoring/allowing these ongoing violations/abuses will eventually be the downfall of this site
re: "...Anything that needs to be said regarding 'the truth' can be said right here on ihub..."
really?
may i suggest an addenda of "exclusions/disclaimers"?
ya know...kinda like the morphed TOS/rules put in place to jettison me into "limbo"
-----------
jettison: a voluntary sacrifice of cargo to lighten a ship's load in time of distress
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/jettison
[EDIT]...just as matt ALLOWED the moderator[s]
on EKWX to indicriminately delete any and ALL of my posts for months on that thread, regardless of their content
it appears that same situation has presented itself on the BKMP board, as ALL my recent posts are being deleted, again with matts knowledge [as i informed him of such and he has done nothing]
so one HAS to wonder...why?
..and is this the type of environment that individuals want to exist?
...and is this collusion?
[and in the meantime, of course my 3 posts a day get eaten up in this covert manner]
---------------
EDIT...case in point of the stalking etc that takes place...within a few minutes of this post a BKMP moderator follows me here to "comment"
who also appears VERY "confuced" as to his interpretation of the post/quote, as it is non-specific to any stock or individuals [besides the FACT his comments are erroneous and hypocritical]
--------------------
this mornings post [#67374] on BKMP that was deleted:
there appears to be continuing "confusion"...
...of what is factual, and what is wishful/hopeful thinking
part of that "confusion" appears to be that "the cart is being put in front of the horse"
that being that before one can state/debate what is factual, there needs to be an agreement/understanding of what "fact" means...and as important [perhaps more-so], what is acceptable as a source for those facts
FACT: a thing done...the quality of being actual...something that has actual existence...a piece of information presented as having objective reality
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/fact
DUE DILIGENCE: The process of investigation, performed by investors, into the details of a potential investment, such as an examination of operations and management and the verification of material facts.
http://www.investorwords.com/1596/due_diligence.html
------------------
due diligence [by definition] excludes mgmt as a source of verified facts
mgmt may make claims as to what is fact, but without verification from at least one neutral third party, they remain claims [wishful/hopeful thinking]
and if supposed statements by mgmt arent even in the form of a PR [which still are not verified facts], but rather by anonymous individuals posting such...that so-called info's credibility/authenticity remains in serious question...and is nothing more than rumor/hearsay twice removed!
----------------------
if individuals cant come to an agreement/understanding on the above simple, basic principles...
if individuals dont question supposed "facts" unless they are verified [as above]...
if individuals dont hold themselves and others accountable/responsible for what they present as "facts"...
...the so-called "info" will always be contested/questioned...and as is the case here...months later, still debated/misrepresented
-----------------------
whats even more "confusing" is that stock-specific message boards were supposedly designed for investors/prospective investors to exchange due diligence [as defined above]
there are plenty of other non-specific boards to "promote" a stock
why would one misrepresent fact/rumor/hearsay on their "own" board?????
GRUB, re: "...passing the buck..."
while i fully understand running and policing a site of this scope is a daunting task, and that it is easy for much to fall through the cracks if attention is not brought to certain "issues", its disturbing when after admin is made aware [repeatedly] of VALID specific situations, that they either "pass the buck" and/or choose not to address them/ignore them and/or "worse"...simply side with groups complaining/pressuring because its the "easier" choice...regardless that its these same "groups" that are the true violators of MULTIPLE TOS and propagators of hearsay/rumor presented as fact [lies]
matt has had a personal "vendetta" against me for some time [confirmed via past PM, and his unwarranted actions against me], and i can only speculate it is due to the above "pressure", and he is sick of hearing of so-called "complaints" about me
since my last post to you i have PM matt regarding issues which he has chosen to ONCE AGAIN ignore/not respond
how is it that an individual who can only post 3 times a day, who posts WITHIN the framework of IHUB rules/regs, providing references/links to support statements...still raises the ire of so many?
...and instead of chastising those that repeatedly post false/misleading so-called info, those that continue with personal attacks, attempts of character assassination, belittlement, stalking, sending intimidating PM, and so on...how is it that its my posts that once again have been deleted by mods?...and with apparent "support" by admin as they were made aware
i came to IHUB years ago as an alternative to the spam filled [etc] RB, et al...the same IHUB that promoted itself as a site that would regulate/moderate in an effort to stimulate factual discussion of financial subjects...a good source for fair/balanced due diligence
do YOU believe that "vision" still exists today?
...or has integrity, honesty, factual due diligence, balance, etc, given way to the "pressures" of the group play and advertising/revenues?
...instead of stimulating factual discussion/debate, has it become a controlled [via mods] breeding ground for one sided manipulators?
while IHUB may be currently profiting by this MO, i submit that it may be short lived/"interrupted"...because there will be a point when it reaches critical mass, and figuratively an "uprising" ala howard beale/network will take place:
"...I want you to get up now. I want all of you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the window. Open it, and stick your head out, and yell, 'I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!
Things have got to change. But first, you've gotta get mad!... You've got to say, 'I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!' Then we'll figure out what to do...But first get up out of your chairs, open the window, stick your head out, and yell, and say it...
I'M AS MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!..."
[if you get my drift]
...and no, i am not "giving up" on ihub :)
lets review some of the "facts" posted today
"Right now, May 15th, the O/S is 3,830,675,699"
huh?, "filing" states over 12B OS as of march 31, 2006
------------
"So, once the buyback is complete and lets just say they only do 1 billion. We will be at 2.8 billlion!!!"
amazing!, "filing" states 9B added, yet according to some posters its actually shrunk from 5 months ago?
------------
"Those shares [8B from CD conversion] will not be released into the O/S until Fall '07."
really?, please provide even one mention in ANY company public doc which states converted CD shares are restricted
...THERE IS NONE!
-----------
where is this so-called info gleaned from?
from an anonymous poster who hasnt even posted since february 17, the day of that "info"
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/profile.asp?user=63215
----------
AND ABOUT THAT CD...
from the so-called "filing"...
"...A portion of the convertible debenture was converted during the year resulting in 8,277,480,606..."
cash at end of '05 was $46K
cash at march 31 '06 was $627K
"fee income" was $48K
leaving $533 unaccounted for
if the $533 came from the conversion of 8.2B shares:
that means conversion value of CD shares are approx .000065...and the outstanding $1M CD [if its not a floating/death spiral convertible] would mean an additional 15B shares!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! "...all is well..." ;)
Rasica, are you AGAIN representing as fact a post by an anonymous alias who claimed they supposedly spoke/communicated with winick and were given certain so-called "info"?
is this the basis which people use to quantify their posts as "factual"?
anonymous third party hearsay?
and why was this supposed communication with winick "validated", but a host of others presented were shot down?
could it be because the so-called "info" is favorable if an individual wanted to "promote" this "gem"?
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! "...all is well..." ;)
even that OS is 45 days old...
"...12,108,156,305 shares outstanding as of march 31, 2006..."
...and as i had previously mentioned it would be dated, just as the info on the last so-called "filing" was 90 days old
so how many more B's have been dumped in the past 45 days as they "bought back" a token amount of shares???
and again no "subsequent events"??,...wheres all the supposed transactions that were done under the BKMP banner?
anyone see any revenues?
the "fee income" could be fees associated with a number of things, including CD conversion
there is absolutely no proof that ALL the shares arent free trading
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
"...all is well!..."
grubmaster/dave
i noticed some of your exchanges with other aliases [here and in the jailhouse] regarding TOS/TOU issues, and particularly one individuals claims of inaction by admin of dispensing equal/fair "justice" towards moderators committing personal attacks, false accusations/lies and other various TOS/TOU...while the "common" poster/alias is at times collared for no apparent other reason than they are "out of favor" with admin and some posters who are frustrated because they are incapable of debating/discussion of factual DD [is their any other kind?] without attempts of unwarranted character assassination/attacks
ok, so its been over 2 months now since admin removed my grandfather "status" without cause [other than above], collared me to 3 posts a day, and i STILL have committed no TOS/TOU...so why am i still relegated to this limbo?
please dont pass the buck and say "ask matt", as he hasnt provided me with a valid response
if my situation here is simply because of "pressure" from other members and this is the quick fix way for admin to handle it because they are sick of hearing their whining...please just come out in public and state such
or if this is just an "oversight", please restore my account as it has been since september of year 2000
[note: since i do currently only have 3 posts a day, i will be inable to respond to the stalkers/attackers that have and do take advantage of that limitation...and who continue to taunt me in PM...which in itself is quite revealing of some individuals character]
does anyone know when the "45 days" are due?
speaking of "facts"...
05/08/06, 11:53AM, #64502, by RU
"Thanks Dave...this week is the week"
#64503, by rak
"a hunch?"
#64504, by RU
"Fact"
what was the "cause" for the deletion of my post, re: facts?
DonLeopoldo
note: this post is ON topic as it shares commonalities and has history, past and present with BKMP
although pinksheets lists terrablock as inc in nevada and previous company was slateco [stated as of 2/06]
btw, they had their charter in nevada revoked twice
a search of good ole wyoming state returns the below:
CID: 200500503503 Type: CORPORATION
Name: TERRABLOCK DEVELOPMENT INC.
Old Name: SLATECO INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
DBA:
Incorporation State: WY Initial Filing: 11-30-2005
Status: ACTIVE Standing: GOOD
Defunct Cause: FORCE ACTIVE Defunct Date:
Mailing Address: 6021 YONGE ST., SUITE 212
TORONTO ONTARIO CAN, M2M 3W2
Officers and Directors:
President:
Vice President:
Secretary:
Treasurer:
Director:
Additional Detail:
Reinstate Date: Assignment Date:
Renewal Date: Amendment Date: 01-31-2006
Other Filing Date: Merger Date: 01-19-2006
RA Resigned Date:
Purpose: Merger ID:
Annual Report No: Last Year Filed:
Profit/Nonprofit: PROFIT Additional Stock:
Common Shares: UNLIMITED Common Par Value: NPV
Preferred Shares: Preferred Par Value:
Intent to Dissolve: Continued/Domesticated:
Expires: Perpetual Revoked:
-----------------------
which is of course the same address listed in corp docs for BKMP
note the initial filing date of 11/30/05
now geez, didnt BKMP [then FCDH] state in its dec 5, '05 PR it sold its interest in terrablock to suncrest/amerossi?...whose last amendment date was 12/15/05
speaking of amerossi, they filed a financial on may 4, which lists notes/CD of $1.8M, 1.5B OS [up from 1.1M in just the past few months!] as of 3/31/06, 0 revs, with 2 RS in its history [1 being a 1 for 1000]...AND NO MENTION OF TERRABLOCK
[nor is there any mention in their original "filing/disclosure" of feb 25, 06]
...lol!...what a condition to begin!
so what did winick really do with terrablock?
...and wasnt that supposed to be part of the so-called "reward" of the divi??...and this from a stock with no liquidity, jumping btwn .01 and .10...that was projected to have a $5 SP?
https://www.otcstockinfo.com/repository/650880/650880_FR10.pdf
-------------------
part of the point of the above is this is further representation that things arent always as promoted/viewed...and appears just to be another tool used to sell shares
anyone care to wager winick will still be involved/profiting with/from terrablock?
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
another mouth to feed...
...and essentially the PR is admitting that dave & co havent had a clue as to how to market the product
and why PR something that is only "in discussion"?
could it be desperation to hold/gain "investors"?
and that "discussion" will assuredly come with a price tag, whether it be shares/percentage/fee...or all three
---------------------
MotorSports Emporium Transforms Operations
Thursday May 11, 11:25 am ET
New Opportunities for GS610(TM) Brake Fluid
SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 11, 2006--MotorSports Emporium Inc. (OTCBB: MSEP - News) today announced it transformed the operations of its GS610(TM) brake fluid to yield new opportunities for the company.
David Keaveney, MSEP president and CEO, commented, "We are in discussions with Motorsports Management International (MMI) to assist MSEP in the sales and marketing of our high-performance brake fluid -- GS610(TM). Our agenda has shifted away from die cast merchandising toward developing a higher margin business. New opportunities exist for our brake fluid and MMI is currently sharing their plan of action with us.
"We have made tremendous strides with GS610(TM), gaining product verification and testimonials from a variety of racing drivers and teams. Additionally, our national sales manager has achieved success with product recognition and education. Though early attempts have been made to secure private label transactions and national distribution, the sale cycle has proven lengthy and political. In an effort to fast forward sales, overcome obstacles, and secure long-term business relationships, we turned to one of the most recognizable names in the motor sports industry, Agajanian and Motorsports Management International (MMI)," stated Keaveney.
"We are fortunate to have been drawn to the opportunities available with an association with MMI. MMI and the Agajanians have the track record and resources that can potentially accelerate GS610(TM) brake fluid into an estimated $500,000 or more in annual business. The focus of our discussions is private labeling, distribution, and celebrity driver endorsements. Specific details are under discussion and will be released should an agreement commence," continued Keaveney.
Keaveney concluded, "There comes a time when hard work, dedication and persistence begin to show signs of triumph. We have worked very diligently to get to where we are today, and we will continue to strive forward in our quest to bring value to our shareholders. 2006 is shaping up to be a fun and exciting year."
About Motorsports Management International
The Agajanians have been involved in motor sports since the 1940s. From 1948 through 1971, Agajanian cars won pole position in the Indianapolis 500 three times, set four track records, and won the race twice (Troy Ruttman in 1952 and Parnelli Jones in 1963). Additionally, the Agajanians had 36 straight entries in the Indianapolis 500. MMI Principal Cary Agajanian has represented every major sanctioning racing body in the world and has been involved in the business of motor sports, at the highest level, for nearly 30 years. The core of MMI's business is race promotion. The Agajanians work with broadcasters, sponsors, promoters, drivers, car owners and manufacturers. MMI represents a variety of talented drivers from different racing series. Drivers include Tony Stewart, Dave Blaney, JJ Yeley, Kasey Kahne, Matt Kenseth, Jamie McMurray, Denny Hamlim and Jeff Green. Visit www.motorsportsmanagement.com for more information.
About MotorSports Emporium Inc.
MotorSports Emporium Inc. is a fast-track company in the motor sports industry targeting enthusiasts who participate in die cast collectible cars, automobile restoration, high-performance accessories, motor sports-related collectibles, automotive and racing art, driver's apparel, race venues and product licensing. For more information, visit www.motorsportsemporium.com. For products visit www.scalecars.com, www.driversdigs.com, www.pitstopstudios.com, www.quadrigamotorsports.com, www.cleancarkit.com and www.gs610usa.com.
This news release may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and section 21E of the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to achieving corporate objectives, developing additional project interests, the company's analysis of opportunities in the acquisition and development of various project interests and certain other matters. These statements are made under the "safe harbor" provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements contained herein.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060511/20060511005625.html?.v=1
re: "...fact..."???..."...we..."???
i believe the "fact" is that it is TFN that is "expanding with other providers in Canada", not BKMP
i believe the "fact" is that TFN "recently purchased MMAweekly", not BKMP
imo the root misconception with the vast majority of individuals stems from reading PRs as if it is BKMP that is executing these actions [and i am talking about ALL "actions" since inception]...it appears they are not...and its either TFN or blackout communication that are directly involved with these transactions
if individuals read the PRs objectively they would be questioning what stake BKMP really has in all this
there is a desperate need for disclosure/transparency for blackout communication...it appears they are the key
if GS610 is so good...
...why is no one willing to offer conventional financing?
"...Although the Company has obtained short-term loans, in the absence of long-term financial support, there can be no assurance that additional financing can be obtained from conventional sources..."
...and if no financing is available, and they are running with over a $300K per qtr burn rate...one could rightfully project...MO' SHARES!
...such as:
* 33,726,900 for consulting services, including 25,693,738 shares to a director
* 40,600,000 for the issuance of stock options to employees
* 3,750,000 issued in connection with equity offerings
...and until the MW lawsuit is cleared, AND then only if it is ruled in their favor...looks like GS610 wont be contributing to revenues...if there is even a warrantable market for it
http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_filings.jsp?url=%2Fredirect.asp%3Ffilename%3D0001165527%252D06....
CONCLUSION: SSDD...it appears this is headed into continuing dilution with no significant revenues for the foreseeable future
although the current market cap is "only" about $1.5M, without something "exciting" to report, looks to go lower, and probably on light volume
a few here will assuredly report these numbers were "expected"...well if they were expected...why would anyone continue to hold...much less promote this "gem"
House Passes Tax Cuts for Investors
By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer
7 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - The House on Wednesday passed a bill sought by President Bush to deliver tax cuts worth $70 billion to investors and to keep 15 million taxpayers from being hit by the alternative minimum tax
The House vote was 244-185. The Senate was expected to clear the bill for Bush's signature Thursday.
The bill provides a two-year extension of the reduced 15 percent tax rate for capital gains and dividends, currently set to expire at the end of 2008.
It also would extend, for this year, recent changes to the alternative minimum tax — originally aimed at making sure the wealthy pay at least some taxes — to prevent it from hitting more upper middle-income families.
The debate divided starkly along partisan lines, with Republicans crediting the tax cuts, first enacted in 2003, with a surging economy, millions of new jobs and surging tax revenues. Democrats countered that the deficit-financed tax cuts are tilted in favor of wealthy investors and that the economic benefits are not as great as advertised.
"Our tax relief sparked this economic growth," said House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill. "And by extending key provisions of that tax relief, today's legislation adds just another spark to the already booming economy."
Added Treasury Secretary John Snow: "It sends a terrific message to the markets that we're going to continue to have low rates on capital."
Critics, including most Democrats, attacked the tax rate reductions on dividends and capital gains as being skewed in favor of the rich. They noted that it was the second half of a GOP budget package that began with $39 billion in benefit cuts over five years, many of which came from programs for the poor such as Medicaid.
Democrats also cited a joint study by the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution that shows taxpayers with incomes greater than $1 million per year winning tax cuts of $42,000 under the bill while families with incomes of $50,000 a year would average a $46 tax cut.
"The Republican Party ... is sending all the millionaires on an all-expenses-paid vacation — for $41,000 a year," said Rep. Jim McDermott (news, bio, voting record), D-Wash. "The rest of America is being forced to choose between filling the gas tank or stocking the refrigerator."
Added Richard Neal, D-Mass: "You cut taxes for Wall Street at the expense of Main Street."
Just 15 Democrats joined all but two Republicans in voting for the bill.
Passage of the bill is the first step of a two-track strategy for advancing the GOP's election-year tax cut agenda.
The first, $70 billion tax bill focused on investor tax breaks and alternative minimum tax relief and it can advance under special rules blocking Senate Democrats from filibustering it to death. Another bill that contains $30 billion in tax breaks backed by both Republicans and Democrats, will advance later.
Those widely supported tax breaks include preserving tax deductions for state and local sales taxes, a tuition tax deduction, a tax break for teachers who buy their own school supplies and a research and development tax credit for businesses.
Under the bill passed Wednesday, wealthier people would be allowed to transfer retirement savings into Roth IRAs. This would provide a shorter-term revenue boost, and therefore helped lawmakers fit more measures into the bill. That's because money moved from traditional IRAs into Roth accounts is taxed immediately, instead of later, when taxpayers withdraw their invested money.
Opponents say the Roth plan would help the Treasury now but shortchange the government in future years because money saved in a Roth IRA grows tax free.
The bill also would extend for two years provisions sought by small businesses to let them write off up to $100,000 in investments in equipment.
"What we do today protects jobs, protects the incomes of our people, strengthens America's economy and protects our future," said Rep. Nancy Johnson (news, bio, voting record), R-Conn
try reaching kolt @...
Mr. Kolt Curry ,
Pres
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=WFIW.PK
since no one can reach him at the TA, try a backdoor somewhere else he may be
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
re: "...We all agree this will be a good stock..."
incorrect
some of us believe this is nothing more than a vehicle to fund the potential rollout of TFN
if the statement were:
"...we all can agree there is a good potential for a MOMO from these price levels, albeit nothing to do directly with TFN..."
...that is an affirmative
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
re: "...I talked to David..."
really?
thanks for the hear-say report
i think i will wait until its documented before believing such [as the contract is]
as always, as with any stock, hear-say "reports" are essentially meaningless
ANY individual could state [and do] "i just talked to the CEO...blah, blah", and propagate any so-called info they choose
the bugman may very well not be "part" of MSEP, but until its "official", just because "dave" may have stated otherwise, OR because some anonymous alias "reports" such, doesnt make it so
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo MSEP ;)
BKMP- other likely scenarios?
INVESTMENT FRAUD--PENNY STOCKS
SEC CASE SAYS ROANOKE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION HEAD USED SHAM CONSULTING DEALS IN STOCK SCHEME: April 12, 2006
JUDGMENT ANNOUNCED IN SEC CASE OVER MANIPULATION OF NEUTRACEUTICAL STOCK: April 6, 2006
MISTRIAL DECLARED IN LAS VEGAS SECURITIES FRAUD CASE AGAINST THREE LAWYERS: March 30, 2006
FORMER CHAPMAN COMPANY EXEC BALDWIN SENTENCED IN MARYLAND: March 23,2006
BOILER ROOM BROKER FERRAGAMO SENTENCED IN NEW JERSEY: March 13, 2006
FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED IN SEC CASE OVER SHELL COMPANY FRAUD SCHEME: February 16, 2006
TWO CANADIANS CHARGED IN SCHEME TO BRIBE BROKERS TO PUSH THEIR COMPANY'S STOCK: February 2006
DEUTSCHE BANK AGREES TO $270 MILLION SETTLEMENT IN CASE OF PENNY STOCK SQUEEZE: February 2, 2006
OPERATOR OF C+ CAPITAL MANAGEMENT PLEADS GUILTY TO FRAUD IN LOS ANGELES: January 26, 2006
SEC CASE TARGETS DISTRIBUTION OF ALLIXON INTERNATIONAL SHARES: January 20, 2006
ANOTHER CIVIL SANCTION FOR KEVIN J QUINN IN SEC CASE: January 18, 2006
DEFIANT UKRAINIAN STOCK PROMOTER ZUBKIS INDICTED IN SAN DIEGO: January 17, 2006
NASD ACCUSES KIRLIN SECURITIES PRINCIPAL AND TRADER OF SCHEMING TO MANIPULATE STOCK PRICE: January 6, 2006
FINAL JUDGMENTS ENTERED IN SEC CASE OVER PENNY STOCK PAY POP SCHEME: December 21, 2005
DIRECTOR OF PENNY STOCK NANO WORLD PROJECTS DISCIPLINED IN BRITISH COLUMBIA: December 19, 2005
NEW JERSEY FREEZES OVER $1 MILLION IN ACCOUNTS BELIEVED RELATED TO OFFSHORE BOILER ROOM HERITAGE FINANCIAL: December 5, 2005
PENNY STOCK EXEC CONVICTED IN ATLANTA OVER FALSE ANTHRAX CLAIMS IN STOCK PROMOTION: December 1, 2005
FIVE CHARGED IN $15 MILLION PENNY STOCK FRAUD WITH TELESERVICES INTERNET GROUP INC: November 23, 2005
FORMER CHAPMAN COMPANY BROKER PLEADS GUILTY TO SECURITIES FRAUD: November 21, 2005
BRITISH COLUMBIA HITS PENNY STOCK SCHEMER MICHAEL MITTON WITH MAX PENALTY: November 16, 2005
FORMER PRINCIPAL OF PREFERRED SECURITIES SETTLES SEC CHARGES OVER OREX GOLD SCHEME: November 7, 2005
PARTIAL SETTLEMENT IN SEC CASE AGAINST CON MAN WHO POSED AS INVESTMENT MANAGER TO MANIPULATE A PENNY STOCK: November 4, 2005
ON THE UPTICK: Penny Stock Mobsters Put the Moves on Spaceplex: FEATURE October 2005
SEC CASE ALLEGES CONVICTED FRAUDSTER WAS BEHIND MANIPULATION OF US WIND FARMING STOCK: September 21, 2005
LEADERS OF BOILER ROOM WALSH MANNING SENTENCED IN NEW YORK: September 20, 2005
CALIFORNIA ORDERS ELUSIVE SECURITIES FIRM ORION VENTURES LTD TO DESIST AND REFRAIN FROM SECURITIES DEALS: September 12, 2005
FORMER PRINCIPAL OF BURNETT GREY SECURITIES INDICTED IN ATLANTA: September 2, 2005
REGISTRATION OF CMKM DIAMONDS STOCK REVOKED AFTER SEC PROCEEDING: August 31, 2005
REPORTS SAY OREX GOLD FIGURE SURGENT CONVICTED IN NEW YORK: August 23, 2005
CALLING DR MITCHEL! SEC SUES OVER STOCK FAX SCAM AND COPYCAT: August 16, 2005
SUKUMO CASE DEFENDANT SETTLES WITH SEC: August 11, 2005
FRENCH NATIONAL SENTENCED IN PRO NET LINK STOCK MANIPULATION: August 1, 2005
SEC SUES MORGAN SPAULDING OVER PENNY STOCK FRAUDS AGAINST FOREIGN INVESTORS: July 5, 2005
SEC CASE AGAINST AIMSI TECHNOLOGIES FEATURES REPEAT PENNY STOCK FRAUDSTER: July 1, 2005
OFFSHORE PENNY STOCK BOILER ROOM FRAUDSTERS SENTENCED IN MIAMI: June 23, 2005
WASHINGTON TARGETS PROMOTERS OF PERUVIAN GOLD MINE SCHEME: June 21, 2005
COURT ORDERS ADDITIONAL DISGORGEMENT FROM TEEN STOCK MANIPULATOR: June 18, 2005
VERMONT MAN SENTENCED IN SECURITIES SCAM: June 17, 2005
TWO SEC COMPLAINTS TARGET "WRONG NUMBER" STOCK SCHEME: June 16, 2005
PENNY STOCKBROKER JOSEPH FERRAGAMO PLEADS GUILTY TO FEDERAL CHARGES FROM THREE JURISDICTIONS: June 15, 2005
SEC ACTION TARGETS RECIPIENTS OF BIO-HEAL LABORATORIES SHARES: June 15, 2005
SETTLEMENT ANNOUNCED IN SEC'S FREEDOM SURF CASE: June 15, 2005
SEC SEEKS THIRD SANCTION AGAINST DISBARRED LAWYER: June 15, 2005
INJUNCTION IN SEC CASE AGAINST BERMUDA SHORT DEFENDANT: June 13, 2005
The GENI Lenders: How a Saudi Arms Dealer and His Cronies Used a Penny Stock to Wipe Out a Minnesota Brokerage Firm--June 2005--FEATURE
SETTLEMENTS IN SEC'S SCORPION TECHNOLOGIES CASE: June 10, 2005
SEC SUES PROMOTERS OF SEALIFE CORPORATION FOR ALLEGED MANIPULATION: June 6, 2005
HOOKED ON HYPE: SEC Case Says Penny Stock Veterans Pulled $20 Million of Illegal Profits Out of Two Worthless Shell Companies: May 2005--FEATURE
SEC SUES CANADIAN OVER SCHEME THAT MOCKED THE PENNY STOCK MARKET: May 11, 2005
OFFSHORE SECURITIES BOILER ROOM FIGURES PLEAD GUILTY IN MIAMI: April 5, 2005
JUDGMENTS ENTERED IN SEC CASE AGAINST "OPERATION BERMUDA SHORT" DEFENDANTS: March 15, 2005
VALLEY FORGE SECURITIES FIGURES INDICTED AND SUED BY SEC: March 12, 2005
TWO BOILER ROOMS EXPELLED BY NASD IN JANUARY GOUGED CUSTOMERS, FLAUNTED RULES: Feature Feb 2005
DAVID WOLFSON SETTLES TWO SEC CASES: February 24, 2005
LANCER HEDGE FUNDS PROVIDED COVER FOR CROOKS AND PENNY STOCKS: February 2005--FEATURE STORY
BOILER ROOM BROKER BARRED FROM PENNY STOCKS IN OREX GOLD CASE: January 24, 2005
CONVICTED FRAUDSTER INDICTED IN PENNY STOCK CASE: September 18, 2004
$11 MILLION RESTITUTION FUND FOR VICTIMS OF A.S. GOLDMEN: Feature September 2004
PENNY STOCK DEFENDANT PLEADS GUILTY TO TWO FLORIDA INDICTMENTS: August 14, 2004
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP!! ;)
re: "...0001 x 0002 I hope everyone that likes to sit on the bid to buy is happy now..."
...love 'dem .0001's...
[who woulda thought?, lol]
..bada-bing!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
[EDIT] dreaminofsailin, may i suggest...
...the "reading is fundamental" program?
...AND to stop listening to the propoganda that is dispensed here by "the mod squad" aka "the ostrich club"
-----------------------------
the recent PR stated that the majority of the shares they intend on "buying back" was to be done over the next few weeks
THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF OS OR AS
and the first PR which announced their intention of doing a buyback [back in dec '05 i believe], stated up to 1 B...not 1B
as to your statement about "they have mislead the public"...i believe that can be stated with authority on more than one occasion
it appears .0001 is a given...now to decide if even that is an attractive SP to add to my .0002 position
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
[EDIT] as to the so-called qtr financials...they wont mean squat if they are like the others filed because they will have dated [3 month old] numbers, AND no listing of subsequent events...just as the last filing
so anyone promoting "wow!...a pinkie that files" is deluded is they think it carries any weight, because it appears they are being used as just another promotional tool to sell shares
do you have difficulty with comprehension?
-- yes, thats correct, winick "rewarded" SH's by RS the stock 1 for 10,000...one of the highest, if not THE highest, RS i have ever seen
the way you present it, its like it was a good thing
-- re: "...Please provide PR statement disclosing this information and the date time when alleged statement was made..."
i couldnt have posted it clearer for anyone to understand who possessed even minimal intelligence..."...winick was telling individuals for months..." [as per MANY individuals reporting such here...btw...werent you one of them?]
-- the so-called "clarification PR" did anything BUT clarify
FACT: as of the date of the PR, OS had risen from 2.5B to 3.8B
for the company to state "...The company has exactly the same capital structure under the new name as it did under the old name..." is at best misleading, if not an outright lie
-- re: "...Sandy Winick is one of only a handful of Company CEOs that discloses Financials through the 15c2-11 or Financial Reports..."
while its better than nothing, barebones unaudited "financials" that are released months after the period covered without reporting all material subsequent events can be [are] misleading as they are not current
whats really needed are 8Ks for all the material events/transactions that are "supposed to be" BKMPs
-- re: "...MMs have shorted BKMP to the tune of 702 Million Shares..."
that info comes from a website whose disclaimer essentially states its hypothetical
http://buyins.net/disclaimer.php
-------------------------
it appears you are continuing your campaign of posting NON-factual so-called info...why would one do that?
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
same53, re: "...Share Structure Question..."
as per year end financials listed @ pinksheets.com
https://www.otcstockinfo.com/repository/623490/623490_FR7.pdf
"...3,830,675,699 as of 12/31/05...[over 90 days ago], and 301,426,988,913 as of 12/31/04..."
but how many B's of shares have traded since that time [12/31/05]????
note: keep in mind that winick was telling individuals for months that share structure had not changed since the previous filing [which are the numbers you posted]...AND that in the "clarification" PR of jan 9 they stated "...The company has exactly the same capital structure under the new name as it did under the old name..."
2 questions: does the above make you feel more or less confident in truth of company statements?
given the above apparent misleading share "info" do you believe that winick verbally and in a PR stating "...not planning to do any reverse stock splits..." could also be a "ruse"?
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
re: "...show me where he is being paid in the numbers..."
what the F is the difference?
its common practice to group payments together under SGA [Selling, general and administrative]
do you see a separate listing for other officers/individuals payments?????
--------------------
insiders taking care of insiders...its always the same S
as for "some" posting on this board?...it wouldnt make a dif what was said or done...if it was $10K or $10M...it would always be "ok"
gag & puke
was this ever posted?...
INTERNATIONAL BERKSHIRE GROUP HOLDINGS TARGET OF CFTC SUIT
By Stephanie Ayres
23 February 2006
Miami, Florida
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on December 22 the filing of a complaint in Florida federal court against a group of companies associated with Boca Raton-based International Berkshire Group Holdings Inc. for running an alleged forex options fraud scheme.
In addition to International Berkshire Group Holdings, defendants in the case include Berkshire International LLC, Berkshire International Holdings Group LLC, Berkshire International Holdings LLC, International IMS Group Holdings Inc., IMS Holdings LLC, Harrington Financial Services SLU, Richmond Royce Advisory Services SL, Oakmont International LLC, Stratford Advisory Services, Jeffrey Jedlicki, Roxana Sofia Lao Mendez, and Beatriz Peralta Quesada.
The defendants were accused of trying to sell illegal forex option contracts which were not traded on exchanges. According to the CFTC, a federal judge ordered an asset freeze on September 29, 2005 pursuant to an order that was sealed by the court until December 6.
One of the defendants in the case, Jeffrey Jedlicki, was involved in a previous CFTC action, which had accused him of using several entities to defraud over 400 customers of about $6 million, most of which was allegedly transferred to offshore accounts. Investors reportedly only recovered about $95,000.
Richmond Royce Advisory Services SL was named in an investor alert by the Spanish financial regulator Comision Nacional de Valores Mobiliarios in April 2005 for allegedly selling financial products in Spain without being licensed to do so.
re: "...Charts are factual & time tested..."
really?
while charts may be "factual" to the extent that they indicate historical data, specOlation of forward looking activity is subject to an individuals interpretation...in other words, their opinion
and what a chart cant tell "you" anything about are the "external forces" that could derail any supposed "indicators"
...and arent they also subject to the same MMM that everyone complains about?
it appears that this "gem" has turned out to be a one-trick-pony...its all about the BB [mod squad] promoted "USA deals", with the assumption that BKMP has a direct stake in TFN...which has yet to be proven [as NOT "clarified" by company PRs]
i have yet to witness any stock that has had dramatic returns based on hear-say privy CEO "knock your socks off" communication...and actually, just the opposite
with dat said, i have established 1/2 a position at my predetermined PPS...and if the other 1/2 fills @ .0001, i will be equally exposed to all the "external forces" that may be at work
but my "exposure" sure as H isnt based on any of the ongoing, one-sided, "factual" irrational exuberance so often displayed/promoted on these BB
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
did someone say buyback?...
would SHs here be willing to go for a similar deal since there is such a "guarantee" for longer term value with TFN, err, BKMP?
this is an ON topic post since a buyback is in progress with BKMP, and because of winicks "relationship" with this other "gem":
May 04, 2006 02:29 PM US Central Timezone
Pearl Asian Mining Industries Will Buy Back 90% of its Issued and Outstanding Common Shares
MANILA, Philippines--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 4, 2006--Pearl Asian Mining Industries, Inc. (OTC: PAIM) will buy back approximately 27,000,000,000 or 90% of its issued and outstanding common shares using a convertible debenture.
PAIM will pay par value of $0.001 per share when issuing its convertible debentures. The debentures will be payable without interest in 5 years and be convertible back to common at the rate of $0.01 per share at any time before maturity.
As an example, a shareholder owning 1,000,000 common shares will keep 100,000 common shares and receive a debenture with a face value of $900 due and payable in 5 years without interest. Any time during the 5 years, the holder will be entitled to convert the debenture to 90,000 common shares.
Only shareholders of record on June 1st will be entitled to convert 9 out of every 10 common shares on the exchange date of the 15th of June, 2006 for a debenture.
The Company's Chairman of the Board, E. Pearl Asian commented, "We are so optimistic about the future of Pearl Asian Mining that we are taking this calculated risk, going into long-term debt, certain that when the debentures become payable, our earnings will far exceed the face value of this debt."
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060504/20060504006071.html?.v=1
really?
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
[EDIT...derset_man] buyback?...
and from whom, pray-tell, are these shares being bought back from @ .0002??
who would be selling shares @ .0002 without a loss?, and why would one sell now anyway when so many expect this is the time for SP appreciation?
are these "virtual shares" being bought from MM?...and if so, wouldnt that have 0 impact on OS/float or SP pressure?
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
dersert_man...no, .0001 is not true "bottom"...there are literally no bottoms with these "gems", as RS after RS can and does happen which decimates SP beyond recognition
example?...this "gem" itself did a 1 for 10,000 RS not too long ago
what do you think would happen to "value" if a RS even 1/10 that was done at .0001
and btw...there is also a world of difference between a bid of .0001/ask .0002, and 0 bid/ask .0001, as so often happens
re: "...Latest info on the O/S..."
...i'm confused?
is this part of the "factual posts" i keep hearing about?
a post from an alias?...and that from a supposed hearsay conversation????
btw...do you even have a link to this?
and even then, varoks specOlations with BKMP have been waaaaay off
and is this post any different?....a post from 2+ months ago stating that the mystery CD [btw, still havent seen you post the source for that supposed "fact"] was done?, when you yourself keep stating that the CD will have no imapct until '07?????
again, may i suggest you post within the same guidelines you demand of others?
even in your post subsequent to this one you state: "...Do rely on facts..."
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
Tsunami Warning Issued for New Zealand
By RAY LILLEY, Associated Press Writer
8 minutes ago
WELLINGTON, New Zealand - A magnitude 8.0 earthquake struck early Thursday near the South Pacific nation of Tonga, the U.S. Geological Survey said. A warning said it was possible a tsunami could hit Fiji and New Zealand within minutes.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060503/ap_on_re_au_an/tonga_earthquake
Rasica...really?...
"...BKMP is that they are all over the airwaves in Canada..."
...thats incorrect, TFN may have some exposure in canada, but it aint BKMP
"...just bought MMa Weekly..."
also incorrect, TFN did
"...hired Trajectory...."
also incorrect, TFN did
"...Hired OEB..."
also TFN...not BKMP
"...converting a $2.2 Million dollar debt till Fall 2007..."
you still have not provided any documentation to support this statement
"...New Radio Announcer..."
also TFN...not BKMP
[all above as per company PRs]
...is there any factual info in this post?
ya know...the facts that you keep insisting from others?
this entire play [trading/investing in BKMP] has gone/done just the opposite of all the accum/dist BS and charts that "some" here were promoting for months...missed all "deadlines" and SP projections
essentially anyone than bought before today [available .0002's] has wasted their time and money...and thats what this game is all about...getting the most use of your money in the shortest period of time
and amazingly "some" are still promoting this as if nothing negative has happened and as good ole sterling aka the_borg_queen would say..."all is well"
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
ya see all those "D"'s...
...next to the symbol BKMP and the volume?
...i am told that it signifies "Dump"
geez, .0001?... who woulda thought?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10915133
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
re: "...9 x 8 .0002 x .0003..."?
losing bid support?
i believe there have been 16 MM @ .0002 for some time now
...love dem .0001's
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
"...The information contained herein is not guaranteed by BUYINS.NET to be accurate, and should not be considered to be all-inclusive...
...Results in this presentation are hypothetical. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading...
...BUYINS.NET and its affiliates may trade for their own accounts in any securities of the issuer or in related securities. BUYINS.NET or its affiliates, directors, officers and employees, may have a long or short position in securities of the issuer or related investments...
... The author of this report, Thomas Ronk and/or his affiliates, do at times have an ownership position in companies mentioned in our reports, and so do members of his family or affiliates and may profit in the event those shares rise in value...
...we call the reader’s attention to the fact that BUYINS.NET is occasionally compensated a $995 per month data fee by companies covered in our reports or a third party or affiliate of the company..."
http://buyins.net/disclaimer.php
[EDIT] re: "...With no stated number I have to believe they are buying back the majority of the OS..."
...really?
what about this little tidbit in the PR?
"...in accordance to the action by the Board of Directors announced in December of 2005..."
and what does it state in that dec PR?
"...up to one billion of the company's stock over the next two years..."
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=104393&tsource=3
---------------
what was that about "no stated number"?
---------------
how does that work again?
dilute 3B..."buyback" 100M
dilute 6B..."buyback" 200M
etc
yeah...thats the ticket
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
-----------------
[EDIT] vulcan...i dont think even 500M...i believe the PR states that whatever amount of shares they intend on buying [which could be 200M for all we know], that the majority of that figure will be purchased over "the next few weeks"
[keeping in mind that they never stated they are buying 1B...but rather UP TO 1B...a common "trick" with these "gems"]
...even so, if it is 500M...that a drop in the dilution bucket
[EDIT] bought another B this morning...
imo going to close at .05 or better today
rumor is 3 PR's a day for the rest of the year until unlimited AS is met [infinity?]
this action is "knocking my socks off"
tell all your friends...remember the first rule of TFN...
go sandy go!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)
[EDIT] kilerb...answered your question in full on RB
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=BKMP&read=16553
WHOIS Record For
Brakeswap.com
Registrant:
Eric Wong
13211 Rippling Brook Drive
Silver Spring, Maryland 20906
US
Registrar: DOTSTER
Domain Name: BRAKESWAP.COM
Created on: 18-JUN-05
Expires on: 18-JUN-07
Last Updated on: 27-JUN-05
Administrative Contact:
Wong, Eric ericwong@bellatlantic.net
Lucent Technologies
13211 Rippling Brook Drive
Silver Spring, Maryland 20906
US
7032892967
Technical Contact:
Wong, Eric ericwong@bellatlantic.net
Lucent Technologies
13211 Rippling Brook Drive
Silver Spring, Maryland 20906
US
7032892967
-----------------
RedEnvelope CFO Leaves Amid 'Budgeting' Errors
3/29/2005
Budgeting errors and an uninspiring Valentine's Day will leave Red Envelope's (REDE:Nasdaq - commentary - research) fourth-quarter results below forecasts and the company's chief financial officer out of a job.
The company replaced its CFO, Eric Wong[???]
-----------------
may 6, 2005
Wyoming Oil & Minerals, Inc
Eric Wong[???] will be named Principal Financial Officer. Appointment of these officers is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors following the closing.
[now SNMO]