Replies to post #22358 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[spider69]

mickey, I think all of us have put too much emphasis on that "engine & transmission" comment. I believe that comment which was 3 or closer to 4 years ago may not apply today. I believe much has evolved both technologically and via the standards that might not support that comment at this moment. It might be a good question to ask mgmt at the ASM and see if he would still categorize it like that. One other thing that I think is weighing on us that you mentioned...."ERICY getting resolved will validate our patents and have others lining up in K of P." I know its only been 6-7 weeks since ERICY but I somehow think that the minimal settlement didn't do enough to get the others shaking in their shoes. I think NOK will/is fighting hard to diminish the amount they owe us and will drag it to arbitration, I hope to heck I am wrong. I would rather go to arbitration than settle for a penny on the dollar (during this negotiation period)like we did with ERICY. I hope my pessimism is irradicated with the cc and earning release in 10 days.....holding every share I can and adding shares every payday..

[loophole73]

Mickey and mschere

The famous M&M boys of IDCC. I must admit that my tea leave reader is stuck on the option to license the Ericy platform and the value added, end product, wording for 3g. I must have been one of Pavlov's dogs in an earlier life because every time I hear "partner", "products" and "cross-licensing" from IDCC, I immediately need ice cream to soothe my exit point upon which I am sitting. I just hope they are focusing on licensing until they get it down to a science before they venture off into another segment of wireless.

Mo
loop